Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review

Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Garima Sharma, Sima Chiva-Razavi, Daniel Viriato, Christel Naujoks, Francesco Patalano, Sarah Bentley, Amy Findley, Chloe Johnson, Rob Arbuckle, James Wolffsohn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-01
Series:BMJ Open Ophthalmology
Online Access:https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000453.full
id doaj-437e68757ae04b00aaaba164503ebd1a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-437e68757ae04b00aaaba164503ebd1a2021-03-17T14:00:22ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Ophthalmology2397-32692020-10-015110.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature reviewGarima Sharma0Sima Chiva-Razavi1Daniel Viriato2Christel Naujoks3Francesco Patalano4Sarah Bentley5Amy Findley6Chloe Johnson7Rob Arbuckle8James Wolffsohn9Novartis Healthcare, Hyderabad, IndiaNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, SwitzerlandNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, SwitzerlandNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, SwitzerlandNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, SwitzerlandAdelphi Values Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, UKAdelphi Values Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, UKAdelphi Values Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, UKAdelphi Values Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, UKOptometry, Aston University, Birmingham, UKPresbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals with phakic presbyopia. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Embase up until October 2017. Specific search terms were used to identify presbyopia studies that included a PROM. All clinical trials with PROM-supported endpoints in presbyopia were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further searches were conducted to retrieve articles documenting the development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMs identified. A total of 703 records were identified; 120 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one clinical trials employed PROMs to support a primary or secondary endpoint. In total, 13 PROMs were identified; a further 23 publications pertaining to the development and validation of these measures were retrieved. Most PROMs were developed prior to release of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 patient-reported outcome guidance and did not satisfy regulatory standards. The Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) was identified as the most appropriate for assessing near-vision functioning in presbyopia. While the NAVQ was developed in line with the FDA guidance, the items do not reflect changes in technology that have occurred since the questionnaire was developed in 2008 (eg, the increase in smartphone use), and the measure was not validated in a purely phakic presbyopia sample. Further research is ongoing to refine the NAVQ to support trial endpoints related to changes in near-vision functioning associated with phakic presbyopia.https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000453.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Garima Sharma
Sima Chiva-Razavi
Daniel Viriato
Christel Naujoks
Francesco Patalano
Sarah Bentley
Amy Findley
Chloe Johnson
Rob Arbuckle
James Wolffsohn
spellingShingle Garima Sharma
Sima Chiva-Razavi
Daniel Viriato
Christel Naujoks
Francesco Patalano
Sarah Bentley
Amy Findley
Chloe Johnson
Rob Arbuckle
James Wolffsohn
Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
author_facet Garima Sharma
Sima Chiva-Razavi
Daniel Viriato
Christel Naujoks
Francesco Patalano
Sarah Bentley
Amy Findley
Chloe Johnson
Rob Arbuckle
James Wolffsohn
author_sort Garima Sharma
title Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
title_short Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
title_full Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
title_sort patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open Ophthalmology
issn 2397-3269
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals with phakic presbyopia. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Embase up until October 2017. Specific search terms were used to identify presbyopia studies that included a PROM. All clinical trials with PROM-supported endpoints in presbyopia were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further searches were conducted to retrieve articles documenting the development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMs identified. A total of 703 records were identified; 120 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one clinical trials employed PROMs to support a primary or secondary endpoint. In total, 13 PROMs were identified; a further 23 publications pertaining to the development and validation of these measures were retrieved. Most PROMs were developed prior to release of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 patient-reported outcome guidance and did not satisfy regulatory standards. The Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) was identified as the most appropriate for assessing near-vision functioning in presbyopia. While the NAVQ was developed in line with the FDA guidance, the items do not reflect changes in technology that have occurred since the questionnaire was developed in 2008 (eg, the increase in smartphone use), and the measure was not validated in a purely phakic presbyopia sample. Further research is ongoing to refine the NAVQ to support trial endpoints related to changes in near-vision functioning associated with phakic presbyopia.
url https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000453.full
work_keys_str_mv AT garimasharma patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT simachivarazavi patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT danielviriato patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT christelnaujoks patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT francescopatalano patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT sarahbentley patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT amyfindley patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT chloejohnson patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT robarbuckle patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT jameswolffsohn patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
_version_ 1724218396156887040