Third-body Wear Damage Produced in CoCr Surfaces by Hydroxyapatite and Alumina Ceramic Debris: A 10-cycle Metal-on-Metal Simulator Study

Ceramic particles are believed to be particularly abrasive due to their extreme hardness. Ceramic debris has been reported in retrieved total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to chipping and fracture of alumina components or by flaking of hydroxyapatite from implant coatings. However there appears to be n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Halim, Michelle Burgett-Moreno, Thomas Donaldson, Ian Clarke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation 2015-12-01
Series:Reconstructive Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://reconstructivereview.org/ojs/index.php/rr/article/view/129
id doaj-43a3c5a6e1924d38b0abada8f35a00fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-43a3c5a6e1924d38b0abada8f35a00fa2020-11-24T21:48:02ZengJoint Implant Surgery & Research FoundationReconstructive Review2331-22622331-22702015-12-015410.15438/rr.5.4.129125Third-body Wear Damage Produced in CoCr Surfaces by Hydroxyapatite and Alumina Ceramic Debris: A 10-cycle Metal-on-Metal Simulator StudyThomas Halim0Michelle Burgett-Moreno1Thomas Donaldson2Ian ClarkeDonaldson Arthritis Research Foundation, 900 E. Washington Street, Suite 200 Colton, CA 92324 USDonaldson Arthritis Research Foundation, 900 E. Washington Street, Suite 200 Colton, CA 92324 USDonaldson Arthritis Research Foundation, 900 E. Washington Street, Suite 200 Colton, CA 92324 USCeramic particles are believed to be particularly abrasive due to their extreme hardness. Ceramic debris has been reported in retrieved total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to chipping and fracture of alumina components or by flaking of hydroxyapatite from implant coatings. However there appears to be no abrasion ranking of such particle behavior. The hypotheses in this study were, i) alumina particles would create large scratches in CoCr surfaces and ii) hydroxyapatite would produce very mild scratching comparable to bone-cement particles. Hydroxyapatite beads came in two types of commercial powders while the flakes were scraped from retrieved femoral stems. Alumina beads came in two commercial powders and flakes were retrieved from a fractured ceramic head. Particle morphologies were determined by SEM and CoCr surface damage by interferometry and SEM. Six 38-mm MOM were mounted inverted in a hip simulator and run with ceramic particles inserted for a 10-second test. Surface-roughness ranking after 10-second abrasion test revealed that bone cement and hydroxyapatite produced least damage to CoCr surfaces while alumina produced the most. Alumina increased surface roughness 19-fold greater than either hydroxyapatite or bone-cement particles. The alumina debris produced numerous scratches typically 20-80 µm wide with some up to 140µm wide. Surprisingly the alumina beads and flakes were pulverized within the 10-second test interval and remained adherent to the CoCr surfaces. Additionally, the hydroxyapatite although also a ceramic had no more effect on CoCr than the bone-cement debris. Use of well-characterized and commercially available alumina and hydroxyapatite powders appeared advantageous for abrasion tests. These new data indicated that such ceramic powders have merit.http://reconstructivereview.org/ojs/index.php/rr/article/view/129ceramic hydroxyapatite alumina debris CoCr, 3rd-body abrasive wear, MOM hip arthroplasty, simulator
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Halim
Michelle Burgett-Moreno
Thomas Donaldson
Ian Clarke
spellingShingle Thomas Halim
Michelle Burgett-Moreno
Thomas Donaldson
Ian Clarke
Third-body Wear Damage Produced in CoCr Surfaces by Hydroxyapatite and Alumina Ceramic Debris: A 10-cycle Metal-on-Metal Simulator Study
Reconstructive Review
ceramic hydroxyapatite alumina debris CoCr, 3rd-body abrasive wear, MOM hip arthroplasty, simulator
author_facet Thomas Halim
Michelle Burgett-Moreno
Thomas Donaldson
Ian Clarke
author_sort Thomas Halim
title Third-body Wear Damage Produced in CoCr Surfaces by Hydroxyapatite and Alumina Ceramic Debris: A 10-cycle Metal-on-Metal Simulator Study
title_short Third-body Wear Damage Produced in CoCr Surfaces by Hydroxyapatite and Alumina Ceramic Debris: A 10-cycle Metal-on-Metal Simulator Study
title_full Third-body Wear Damage Produced in CoCr Surfaces by Hydroxyapatite and Alumina Ceramic Debris: A 10-cycle Metal-on-Metal Simulator Study
title_fullStr Third-body Wear Damage Produced in CoCr Surfaces by Hydroxyapatite and Alumina Ceramic Debris: A 10-cycle Metal-on-Metal Simulator Study
title_full_unstemmed Third-body Wear Damage Produced in CoCr Surfaces by Hydroxyapatite and Alumina Ceramic Debris: A 10-cycle Metal-on-Metal Simulator Study
title_sort third-body wear damage produced in cocr surfaces by hydroxyapatite and alumina ceramic debris: a 10-cycle metal-on-metal simulator study
publisher Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation
series Reconstructive Review
issn 2331-2262
2331-2270
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Ceramic particles are believed to be particularly abrasive due to their extreme hardness. Ceramic debris has been reported in retrieved total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to chipping and fracture of alumina components or by flaking of hydroxyapatite from implant coatings. However there appears to be no abrasion ranking of such particle behavior. The hypotheses in this study were, i) alumina particles would create large scratches in CoCr surfaces and ii) hydroxyapatite would produce very mild scratching comparable to bone-cement particles. Hydroxyapatite beads came in two types of commercial powders while the flakes were scraped from retrieved femoral stems. Alumina beads came in two commercial powders and flakes were retrieved from a fractured ceramic head. Particle morphologies were determined by SEM and CoCr surface damage by interferometry and SEM. Six 38-mm MOM were mounted inverted in a hip simulator and run with ceramic particles inserted for a 10-second test. Surface-roughness ranking after 10-second abrasion test revealed that bone cement and hydroxyapatite produced least damage to CoCr surfaces while alumina produced the most. Alumina increased surface roughness 19-fold greater than either hydroxyapatite or bone-cement particles. The alumina debris produced numerous scratches typically 20-80 µm wide with some up to 140µm wide. Surprisingly the alumina beads and flakes were pulverized within the 10-second test interval and remained adherent to the CoCr surfaces. Additionally, the hydroxyapatite although also a ceramic had no more effect on CoCr than the bone-cement debris. Use of well-characterized and commercially available alumina and hydroxyapatite powders appeared advantageous for abrasion tests. These new data indicated that such ceramic powders have merit.
topic ceramic hydroxyapatite alumina debris CoCr, 3rd-body abrasive wear, MOM hip arthroplasty, simulator
url http://reconstructivereview.org/ojs/index.php/rr/article/view/129
work_keys_str_mv AT thomashalim thirdbodyweardamageproducedincocrsurfacesbyhydroxyapatiteandaluminaceramicdebrisa10cyclemetalonmetalsimulatorstudy
AT michelleburgettmoreno thirdbodyweardamageproducedincocrsurfacesbyhydroxyapatiteandaluminaceramicdebrisa10cyclemetalonmetalsimulatorstudy
AT thomasdonaldson thirdbodyweardamageproducedincocrsurfacesbyhydroxyapatiteandaluminaceramicdebrisa10cyclemetalonmetalsimulatorstudy
AT ianclarke thirdbodyweardamageproducedincocrsurfacesbyhydroxyapatiteandaluminaceramicdebrisa10cyclemetalonmetalsimulatorstudy
_version_ 1725893786250248192