A Test Method to Evaluate Salt Tolerance of Ornamentals

Because salts in irrigation water decrease plant growth, we wanted to develop a quick and easy method for evaluating salt tolerance that could be used in the greenhouse. Using plastic containers with lids, sea salt, and rooted cuttings, we monitored changes in plant quality, growth, and leaf water p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kimberly Moore, Charles Wajsbrot, Cristina Burgart, Luci Fisher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS) 2019-06-01
Series:HortTechnology
Subjects:
na
Online Access:https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/29/4/article-p434.xml
id doaj-43b13a3fd080458a8333a4fd6c2b218b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-43b13a3fd080458a8333a4fd6c2b218b2020-11-25T04:00:23ZengAmerican Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS)HortTechnology1943-77142019-06-01294434437https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH04365-19A Test Method to Evaluate Salt Tolerance of OrnamentalsKimberly MooreCharles Wajsbrot Cristina Burgart Luci FisherBecause salts in irrigation water decrease plant growth, we wanted to develop a quick and easy method for evaluating salt tolerance that could be used in the greenhouse. Using plastic containers with lids, sea salt, and rooted cuttings, we monitored changes in plant quality, growth, and leaf water potential as electrical conductivity (EC) and sodium (Na) levels increased. In the first of two experiments, we compared sea hibiscus (Hibiscus tilliaceus) leaf water potential and plant quality in solutions with an EC of 0, 2.1, 4.2, 6.1, or 8.2 dS·m−1 (0, 240, 420, 610, or 1010 mg·L−1 Na). After 14 days, sea hibiscus quality in solutions with an EC of 6.1 or 8.2 dS·m−1 was less than plants in solutions of 0, 2.1, or 4.2 dS·m−1. There was no difference in quality among plants in 0, 2.1, or 4.2 dS·m−1 solutions. To test this method, in Expt. 2, we compared coleus (Coleus ×hybridus), copperleaf (Acalypha wilkesiana), ficus (Ficus benjamina), jasmine (Jasminium multiflorum), and plumbago (Plumbago auriculata) plant quality and growth in solutions with an EC of 0, 1.3, 2.1, 4.2, 5.6, or 6.1 dS·m−1 (0, 170, 240, 420, 520, or 610 mg·L−1 Na). Coleus quality declined at an EC greater than 1.3 dS·m−1, whereas jasmine and plumbago quality declined at an EC greater than 2.1 dS·m−1 Copperleaf and ficus declined at an EC greater than 4.2 dS·m−1. Plant response did vary with low to medium salt-tolerant plants tolerating at an EC up to 1.3 and 170 mg·L−1 Na, whereas plants with a greater salt tolerance tolerated at EC and Na values up to 4.2 dS·m−1 and 420 mg·m−1 Na, respectively. The use of this method benefits growers by determining upper EC and Na limits when faced with poor-quality water resulting from saltwater intrusion or when using reclaimed wastewater with greater EC and Na levels.https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/29/4/article-p434.xmlelectrical conductivitynanacisodium
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kimberly Moore
Charles Wajsbrot
Cristina Burgart
Luci Fisher
spellingShingle Kimberly Moore
Charles Wajsbrot
Cristina Burgart
Luci Fisher
A Test Method to Evaluate Salt Tolerance of Ornamentals
HortTechnology
electrical conductivity
na
naci
sodium
author_facet Kimberly Moore
Charles Wajsbrot
Cristina Burgart
Luci Fisher
author_sort Kimberly Moore
title A Test Method to Evaluate Salt Tolerance of Ornamentals
title_short A Test Method to Evaluate Salt Tolerance of Ornamentals
title_full A Test Method to Evaluate Salt Tolerance of Ornamentals
title_fullStr A Test Method to Evaluate Salt Tolerance of Ornamentals
title_full_unstemmed A Test Method to Evaluate Salt Tolerance of Ornamentals
title_sort test method to evaluate salt tolerance of ornamentals
publisher American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS)
series HortTechnology
issn 1943-7714
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Because salts in irrigation water decrease plant growth, we wanted to develop a quick and easy method for evaluating salt tolerance that could be used in the greenhouse. Using plastic containers with lids, sea salt, and rooted cuttings, we monitored changes in plant quality, growth, and leaf water potential as electrical conductivity (EC) and sodium (Na) levels increased. In the first of two experiments, we compared sea hibiscus (Hibiscus tilliaceus) leaf water potential and plant quality in solutions with an EC of 0, 2.1, 4.2, 6.1, or 8.2 dS·m−1 (0, 240, 420, 610, or 1010 mg·L−1 Na). After 14 days, sea hibiscus quality in solutions with an EC of 6.1 or 8.2 dS·m−1 was less than plants in solutions of 0, 2.1, or 4.2 dS·m−1. There was no difference in quality among plants in 0, 2.1, or 4.2 dS·m−1 solutions. To test this method, in Expt. 2, we compared coleus (Coleus ×hybridus), copperleaf (Acalypha wilkesiana), ficus (Ficus benjamina), jasmine (Jasminium multiflorum), and plumbago (Plumbago auriculata) plant quality and growth in solutions with an EC of 0, 1.3, 2.1, 4.2, 5.6, or 6.1 dS·m−1 (0, 170, 240, 420, 520, or 610 mg·L−1 Na). Coleus quality declined at an EC greater than 1.3 dS·m−1, whereas jasmine and plumbago quality declined at an EC greater than 2.1 dS·m−1 Copperleaf and ficus declined at an EC greater than 4.2 dS·m−1. Plant response did vary with low to medium salt-tolerant plants tolerating at an EC up to 1.3 and 170 mg·L−1 Na, whereas plants with a greater salt tolerance tolerated at EC and Na values up to 4.2 dS·m−1 and 420 mg·m−1 Na, respectively. The use of this method benefits growers by determining upper EC and Na limits when faced with poor-quality water resulting from saltwater intrusion or when using reclaimed wastewater with greater EC and Na levels.
topic electrical conductivity
na
naci
sodium
url https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/29/4/article-p434.xml
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberlymoore atestmethodtoevaluatesalttoleranceofornamentals
AT charleswajsbrot atestmethodtoevaluatesalttoleranceofornamentals
AT cristinaburgart atestmethodtoevaluatesalttoleranceofornamentals
AT lucifisher atestmethodtoevaluatesalttoleranceofornamentals
AT kimberlymoore testmethodtoevaluatesalttoleranceofornamentals
AT charleswajsbrot testmethodtoevaluatesalttoleranceofornamentals
AT cristinaburgart testmethodtoevaluatesalttoleranceofornamentals
AT lucifisher testmethodtoevaluatesalttoleranceofornamentals
_version_ 1724450878649270272