Reviving the United States' Commitment to Pakistan and Afghanistan

As President Obama is in the midst of deciding whether additional U.S.combat forces are needed in Afghanistan in addition to the 21,000 troops recently committed, he must realize that additional armed forces are only a stopgap measure in Afghanistan's downward spiral into an 'undergoverned...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dr. Steve Young, Dr. Imdad Hussain Sahito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Henley-Putnam University 2009-01-01
Series:Journal of Strategic Security
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=jss
id doaj-43d4feb5d2224332bf1f03eeaf2331d3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-43d4feb5d2224332bf1f03eeaf2331d32020-11-24T21:16:09ZengHenley-Putnam UniversityJournal of Strategic Security1944-04641944-04722009-01-01241730Reviving the United States' Commitment to Pakistan and AfghanistanDr. Steve YoungDr. Imdad Hussain SahitoAs President Obama is in the midst of deciding whether additional U.S.combat forces are needed in Afghanistan in addition to the 21,000 troops recently committed, he must realize that additional armed forces are only a stopgap measure in Afghanistan's downward spiral into an 'undergoverned' failed state. Similarly, as Pakistan's fragile and fractured civilian government continues to appease the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), an umbrella organization of Pakistani Pashtun tribesmen with Taliban cultural values led by Baitullah Mehsud and others, it comes closer to the concept of a "misgoverned" failed state, possessing a small arsenal of nuclear arms. The problem for the U.S. administration is that neither of these countries can be allowed to fall further into disrepair. At the same time each requires a different and unique approach to the threat of "Talibanization" that faces each country—the control of territory within each country by Islamic radicals seeking to impose their ultraconservative interpretation of shar'ia law onto the general populace. Generally acknowledged is the belief that what has tentatively worked in Iraq, that is, the additional U.S. troops and employment of former Sunni insurgents to help fight foreign fighters associated with al-Qaida, will not work in either Afghanistan or Pakistan. While a regional approach to the conflict in these two countries is warranted, Afghanistan and Pakistan are on two different economic, social, and political playing fields. Hence, there cannot be a one-size-fits-all solution for the two countries, especially one that draws on the Iraq playbook. In addition to its internal political problems, Pakistan also faces the issue of al-Qaida and Taliban training camps positioned in its literal back yard, the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA or Tribal Areas). Resolution of the War on Terror cannot come to fruition without addressing the problems that exist in the Tribal Areas. This largely self-governed terrain has come under Taliban influence and serves as a safe haven for Taliban and foreign-fighter cross-border attacks into Afghanistan and, more recently, large-scale attacks into Pakistan itself.http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=jssAfghanistanIslamic culture and politicsPakistanRadicalizationTalibanTerrorism / counterterrorism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dr. Steve Young
Dr. Imdad Hussain Sahito
spellingShingle Dr. Steve Young
Dr. Imdad Hussain Sahito
Reviving the United States' Commitment to Pakistan and Afghanistan
Journal of Strategic Security
Afghanistan
Islamic culture and politics
Pakistan
Radicalization
Taliban
Terrorism / counterterrorism
author_facet Dr. Steve Young
Dr. Imdad Hussain Sahito
author_sort Dr. Steve Young
title Reviving the United States' Commitment to Pakistan and Afghanistan
title_short Reviving the United States' Commitment to Pakistan and Afghanistan
title_full Reviving the United States' Commitment to Pakistan and Afghanistan
title_fullStr Reviving the United States' Commitment to Pakistan and Afghanistan
title_full_unstemmed Reviving the United States' Commitment to Pakistan and Afghanistan
title_sort reviving the united states' commitment to pakistan and afghanistan
publisher Henley-Putnam University
series Journal of Strategic Security
issn 1944-0464
1944-0472
publishDate 2009-01-01
description As President Obama is in the midst of deciding whether additional U.S.combat forces are needed in Afghanistan in addition to the 21,000 troops recently committed, he must realize that additional armed forces are only a stopgap measure in Afghanistan's downward spiral into an 'undergoverned' failed state. Similarly, as Pakistan's fragile and fractured civilian government continues to appease the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), an umbrella organization of Pakistani Pashtun tribesmen with Taliban cultural values led by Baitullah Mehsud and others, it comes closer to the concept of a "misgoverned" failed state, possessing a small arsenal of nuclear arms. The problem for the U.S. administration is that neither of these countries can be allowed to fall further into disrepair. At the same time each requires a different and unique approach to the threat of "Talibanization" that faces each country—the control of territory within each country by Islamic radicals seeking to impose their ultraconservative interpretation of shar'ia law onto the general populace. Generally acknowledged is the belief that what has tentatively worked in Iraq, that is, the additional U.S. troops and employment of former Sunni insurgents to help fight foreign fighters associated with al-Qaida, will not work in either Afghanistan or Pakistan. While a regional approach to the conflict in these two countries is warranted, Afghanistan and Pakistan are on two different economic, social, and political playing fields. Hence, there cannot be a one-size-fits-all solution for the two countries, especially one that draws on the Iraq playbook. In addition to its internal political problems, Pakistan also faces the issue of al-Qaida and Taliban training camps positioned in its literal back yard, the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA or Tribal Areas). Resolution of the War on Terror cannot come to fruition without addressing the problems that exist in the Tribal Areas. This largely self-governed terrain has come under Taliban influence and serves as a safe haven for Taliban and foreign-fighter cross-border attacks into Afghanistan and, more recently, large-scale attacks into Pakistan itself.
topic Afghanistan
Islamic culture and politics
Pakistan
Radicalization
Taliban
Terrorism / counterterrorism
url http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=jss
work_keys_str_mv AT drsteveyoung revivingtheunitedstatescommitmenttopakistanandafghanistan
AT drimdadhussainsahito revivingtheunitedstatescommitmenttopakistanandafghanistan
_version_ 1726016799614435328