EXPLOITATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF IN DISPUTED AREAS AN EXAMPLE OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN

This paper aims to examine the legal regime related to define the outer limits of the continental shelf beyond 200 NM. Firstly, special focus will be on the development of the legal concept of the continental shelf. Relevant provisions of the LOS Convention and Article76 inparticular will be scrutin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. S. Peters
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Publshing House V.Ема 2016-06-01
Series:BRICS Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/32
id doaj-43ea52a957214f14bc140069bfee68c6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-43ea52a957214f14bc140069bfee68c62021-07-29T07:56:09ZengPublshing House V.ЕмаBRICS Law Journal2409-90582412-23432016-06-0131426510.21684/2412-2343-2016-3-1-42-6531EXPLOITATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF IN DISPUTED AREAS AN EXAMPLE OF THE ARCTIC OCEANM. S. Peters0Xavier University Bhubaneswar, Xavier School of Sustainability, OdishaThis paper aims to examine the legal regime related to define the outer limits of the continental shelf beyond 200 NM. Firstly, special focus will be on the development of the legal concept of the continental shelf. Relevant provisions of the LOS Convention and Article76 inparticular will be scrutinized. Subsequently there is an assumption on which the principles of the Arctic outer continental margin delimitation will be conducted in relation of hypothetic application during the practice of an international adjudicative body. The delimitation within 200 NM and beyond200 NM will be compared. The fourth chapter will be concentrated on the role of the Commission as an important participant of delimitation process. Also there will be a general overview of the state practice concerning the establishment of the outer continental margin in theArctic, the reaction of other Arctic States and recommendations of the Commission.It will be concluded that 'there are some difficulties in implementing the Article 76 (locating the foot of the slope and dealing with ridge issues), however it is possible to delimit the continental margin of the world based on the Article 76.' Difficulties in implementing and some discrepancies in provisions of the Article 76 do not constitute grounds for considering of a new legal approach. Discrepancies are mainly con tained in the Rules of Procedure and in the Scientific and Technical Guidelines of the Commission. They can be disposed practically without considering the legal concept. In case of unresolved land or maritime dispute the cooperation among coastal states is the best way to avoid conflicts while delimiting the outer continental margin.https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/32delimitation under the law of seaarticle 76 of loscommission and function under loscontinental shelf and resource managementexploitation of arctic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. S. Peters
spellingShingle M. S. Peters
EXPLOITATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF IN DISPUTED AREAS AN EXAMPLE OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN
BRICS Law Journal
delimitation under the law of sea
article 76 of los
commission and function under los
continental shelf and resource management
exploitation of arctic
author_facet M. S. Peters
author_sort M. S. Peters
title EXPLOITATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF IN DISPUTED AREAS AN EXAMPLE OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN
title_short EXPLOITATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF IN DISPUTED AREAS AN EXAMPLE OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN
title_full EXPLOITATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF IN DISPUTED AREAS AN EXAMPLE OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN
title_fullStr EXPLOITATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF IN DISPUTED AREAS AN EXAMPLE OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN
title_full_unstemmed EXPLOITATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF IN DISPUTED AREAS AN EXAMPLE OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN
title_sort exploitation of the continental shelf in disputed areas an example of the arctic ocean
publisher Publshing House V.Ема
series BRICS Law Journal
issn 2409-9058
2412-2343
publishDate 2016-06-01
description This paper aims to examine the legal regime related to define the outer limits of the continental shelf beyond 200 NM. Firstly, special focus will be on the development of the legal concept of the continental shelf. Relevant provisions of the LOS Convention and Article76 inparticular will be scrutinized. Subsequently there is an assumption on which the principles of the Arctic outer continental margin delimitation will be conducted in relation of hypothetic application during the practice of an international adjudicative body. The delimitation within 200 NM and beyond200 NM will be compared. The fourth chapter will be concentrated on the role of the Commission as an important participant of delimitation process. Also there will be a general overview of the state practice concerning the establishment of the outer continental margin in theArctic, the reaction of other Arctic States and recommendations of the Commission.It will be concluded that 'there are some difficulties in implementing the Article 76 (locating the foot of the slope and dealing with ridge issues), however it is possible to delimit the continental margin of the world based on the Article 76.' Difficulties in implementing and some discrepancies in provisions of the Article 76 do not constitute grounds for considering of a new legal approach. Discrepancies are mainly con tained in the Rules of Procedure and in the Scientific and Technical Guidelines of the Commission. They can be disposed practically without considering the legal concept. In case of unresolved land or maritime dispute the cooperation among coastal states is the best way to avoid conflicts while delimiting the outer continental margin.
topic delimitation under the law of sea
article 76 of los
commission and function under los
continental shelf and resource management
exploitation of arctic
url https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/32
work_keys_str_mv AT mspeters exploitationofthecontinentalshelfindisputedareasanexampleofthearcticocean
_version_ 1721259249963630592