Prediction of the VeriStrat test in first-line therapy of pemetrexed-based regimens for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients

• Main Authors: Bo Jia, Zhi Dong, Di Wu, Jun Zhao, Meina Wu, Tongtong An, Yuyan Wang, Minglei Zhuo, Jianjie Li, Yang Wang, Jie Zhang, Xinghui Zhao, Sheng Li, Junfeng Li, Menglei Ma, Chen Chen, Xue Yang, Jia Zhong, Hanxiao Chen, Jingjing Wang, Yujia Chi, Xiaoyu Zhai, Song Cui, Rong Zhang, Qingwei Ma, Jian Fang, Ziping Wang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2020-12-01
• Series: Cancer Cell International
• Subjects: Lung adenocarcinoma; Pemetrexed; Prognosis; Treatment; VeriStrat
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01662-5

Abstract Background Although advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have significantly better survival outcomes after pemetrexed based treatment, a subset of patients still show intrinsic resistance and progress rapidly. Therefore we aimed to use a blood-based protein signature (VeriStrat, VS) to analyze whether VS could identify the subset of patients who had poor efficacy on pemetrexed therapy. Methods This study retrospectively analysed 72 advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who received first-line pemetrexed/platinum or combined with bevacizumab treatment. Results Plasma samples from these patients were analysed using VS and classified into the Good (VS-G) or Poor (VS-P) group. The relationship between efficacy and VS status was further investigated. Of the 72 patients included in this study, 35 (48.6%) were treated with pemetrexed plus platinum and 37 (51.4%) were treated with pemetrexed/platinum combined with bevacizumab. Among all patients, 60 (83.3%) and 12 (16.7%) patients were classified as VS-G and VS-P, respectively. VS-G patients had significantly better median progression-free survival (PFS) (Unreached vs. 4.2 months; P < 0.001) than VS-P patients. In addition, the partial response (PR) rate was higher in the VS-G group than that in the VS-P group (46.7% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.212). Subgroup analysis showed that PFS was also significantly longer in the VS-G group than that in the VS-P group regardless of whether patients received chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Conclusions Our study indicated that VS might be considered as a novel and valid method to predict the efficacy of pemetrexed-based therapy and identify a subset of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who had intrinsic resistance to pemetrexed based regimens. However, larger sample studies are still needed to further confirm this result.