A framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters: impact on model results and response to dynamic catchment characteristics

<p>Previous studies have shown that the seasonal dynamics of model parameters can compensate for structural defects of hydrological models and improve the accuracy and robustness of the streamflow forecast to some extent. However, some fundamental issues for improving model performance with se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Lan, K. Lin, C.-Y. Xu, Z. Liu, H. Cai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-12-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/24/5859/2020/hess-24-5859-2020.pdf
id doaj-443995b4b5434d0d90670f4e88e99dc5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-443995b4b5434d0d90670f4e88e99dc52020-12-08T09:13:13ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382020-12-01245859587410.5194/hess-24-5859-2020A framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters: impact on model results and response to dynamic catchment characteristicsT. Lan0T. Lan1K. Lin2K. Lin3K. Lin4C.-Y. Xu5Z. Liu6Z. Liu7H. Cai8School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, ChinaDepartment of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, NorwaySchool of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Oceanic Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, ChinaSouthern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519000, ChinaDepartment of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, NorwayGuangdong Key Laboratory of Oceanic Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, ChinaSouthern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519000, ChinaSouthern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519000, China<p>Previous studies have shown that the seasonal dynamics of model parameters can compensate for structural defects of hydrological models and improve the accuracy and robustness of the streamflow forecast to some extent. However, some fundamental issues for improving model performance with seasonal dynamic parameters still need to be addressed. In this regard, this study is dedicated to (1) proposing a novel framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters to improve model performance and (2) expanding the discussion on model results and the response of seasonal dynamic parameters to dynamic characteristics of catchments. The procedure of the framework is developed with (1) extraction of the dynamic catchment characteristics using current data-mining techniques, (2) subperiod calibration operations for seasonal dynamic parameters, considering the effects of the significant correlation between the parameters, the number of multiplying parameters, and the temporal memory in the model states in two adjacent subperiods on calibration operations, and (3) multi-metric assessment of model performance designed for various flow phases. The main finding is that (1) the proposed framework significantly improved the accuracy and robustness of the model; (2) however, there was a generally poor response of the seasonal dynamic parameter set to catchment dynamics. Namely, the dynamic changes in parameters did not follow the dynamics of catchment characteristics. Hence, we deepen the discussion on the poor response in terms of (1) the evolutionary processes of seasonal dynamic parameters optimized by global optimization, considering that the possible failure in finding the global optimum might lead to unreasonable seasonal dynamic parameter values. Moreover, a practical tool for visualizing the evolutionary processes of seasonal dynamic parameters was designed using geometry visualization techniques. (2) We also discuss the strong correlation between parameters considering that dynamic changes in one parameter might be interfered with by other parameters due to their interdependence. Consequently, the poor response of the seasonal dynamic parameter set to dynamic catchment characteristics may be attributed in part to the possible failure in finding the global optimum and strong correlation between parameters. Further analysis also revealed that even though individual parameters cannot respond well to dynamic catchment characteristics, a dynamic parameter set could carry the information extracted from dynamic catchment characteristics and improve the model performance.</p>https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/24/5859/2020/hess-24-5859-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. Lan
T. Lan
K. Lin
K. Lin
K. Lin
C.-Y. Xu
Z. Liu
Z. Liu
H. Cai
spellingShingle T. Lan
T. Lan
K. Lin
K. Lin
K. Lin
C.-Y. Xu
Z. Liu
Z. Liu
H. Cai
A framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters: impact on model results and response to dynamic catchment characteristics
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet T. Lan
T. Lan
K. Lin
K. Lin
K. Lin
C.-Y. Xu
Z. Liu
Z. Liu
H. Cai
author_sort T. Lan
title A framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters: impact on model results and response to dynamic catchment characteristics
title_short A framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters: impact on model results and response to dynamic catchment characteristics
title_full A framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters: impact on model results and response to dynamic catchment characteristics
title_fullStr A framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters: impact on model results and response to dynamic catchment characteristics
title_full_unstemmed A framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters: impact on model results and response to dynamic catchment characteristics
title_sort framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters: impact on model results and response to dynamic catchment characteristics
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2020-12-01
description <p>Previous studies have shown that the seasonal dynamics of model parameters can compensate for structural defects of hydrological models and improve the accuracy and robustness of the streamflow forecast to some extent. However, some fundamental issues for improving model performance with seasonal dynamic parameters still need to be addressed. In this regard, this study is dedicated to (1) proposing a novel framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters to improve model performance and (2) expanding the discussion on model results and the response of seasonal dynamic parameters to dynamic characteristics of catchments. The procedure of the framework is developed with (1) extraction of the dynamic catchment characteristics using current data-mining techniques, (2) subperiod calibration operations for seasonal dynamic parameters, considering the effects of the significant correlation between the parameters, the number of multiplying parameters, and the temporal memory in the model states in two adjacent subperiods on calibration operations, and (3) multi-metric assessment of model performance designed for various flow phases. The main finding is that (1) the proposed framework significantly improved the accuracy and robustness of the model; (2) however, there was a generally poor response of the seasonal dynamic parameter set to catchment dynamics. Namely, the dynamic changes in parameters did not follow the dynamics of catchment characteristics. Hence, we deepen the discussion on the poor response in terms of (1) the evolutionary processes of seasonal dynamic parameters optimized by global optimization, considering that the possible failure in finding the global optimum might lead to unreasonable seasonal dynamic parameter values. Moreover, a practical tool for visualizing the evolutionary processes of seasonal dynamic parameters was designed using geometry visualization techniques. (2) We also discuss the strong correlation between parameters considering that dynamic changes in one parameter might be interfered with by other parameters due to their interdependence. Consequently, the poor response of the seasonal dynamic parameter set to dynamic catchment characteristics may be attributed in part to the possible failure in finding the global optimum and strong correlation between parameters. Further analysis also revealed that even though individual parameters cannot respond well to dynamic catchment characteristics, a dynamic parameter set could carry the information extracted from dynamic catchment characteristics and improve the model performance.</p>
url https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/24/5859/2020/hess-24-5859-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tlan aframeworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT tlan aframeworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT klin aframeworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT klin aframeworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT klin aframeworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT cyxu aframeworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT zliu aframeworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT zliu aframeworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT hcai aframeworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT tlan frameworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT tlan frameworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT klin frameworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT klin frameworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT klin frameworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT cyxu frameworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT zliu frameworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT zliu frameworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
AT hcai frameworkforseasonalvariationsofhydrologicalmodelparametersimpactonmodelresultsandresponsetodynamiccatchmentcharacteristics
_version_ 1724390105948356608