Randomized trial comparing the incidence of unintended sciatic nerve block following ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block with two different volumes of ropivacaine for hemorrhoidectomy: A pilot study

Aim: To compare the incidence of unintended sciatic nerve block following pudendal nerve block in the interligamentous plane with two different volumes of ropivacaine for post hemorrhoidectomy pain. Materials and Methods: 30 patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy were enrolled for the study and random...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krishnagopal Vinod, Pranjali Kurhekar, Krishnakumar Sharanya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Pain
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indianjpain.org/article.asp?issn=0970-5333;year=2019;volume=33;issue=3;spage=151;epage=155;aulast=Vinod
id doaj-444a8ebbccf0473a84d40c40146124f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-444a8ebbccf0473a84d40c40146124f02020-11-25T02:54:00ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Pain0970-53332019-01-0133315115510.4103/ijpn.ijpn_60_19Randomized trial comparing the incidence of unintended sciatic nerve block following ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block with two different volumes of ropivacaine for hemorrhoidectomy: A pilot studyKrishnagopal VinodPranjali KurhekarKrishnakumar SharanyaAim: To compare the incidence of unintended sciatic nerve block following pudendal nerve block in the interligamentous plane with two different volumes of ropivacaine for post hemorrhoidectomy pain. Materials and Methods: 30 patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy were enrolled for the study and randomly divided into two groups. Prior to the block a scout scan was performed and the pudendal artery, nerve and the sciatic nerve were identified in the interligamentous plane. All the patients received bilateral pudendal nerve block under ultrasound guidance with 5ml of 0.25% ropivacaine in group 1 and 10 ml in group 2. The spread of local anaesthetic to the ipsilateral sciatic nerve was noted under ultrasound imaging. The time of first rescue analgesia (FRA) and total analgesic requirement(TAR) were noted in both groups. The overall patient satisfaction was assessed with a three point scale.The unintended motor and sensory block of the sciatic nerve was noted. Results: The right pudendal artery was visualized in all cases where but left pudendal artery was not visualized in 1 case. The right & left pudendal nerve was visualized in 40% & 46.7% of cases in group I and 40% in both sides of group 2. The incidence of spread of drug towards the right and left sciatic nerve was more in group II (73.3% & 66.6%) than group I (40% & 33.3%). Statistically significant difference was not noted in the time for FRA (P value 0.684) & TAR (P value 0.579). There was no clinically significant sciatic nerve block. Conclusion: We conclude that less volume of local anaesthetic can achieve effective pudendal nerve block minimizing the spread to ipsilateral sciatic nerve.http://www.indianjpain.org/article.asp?issn=0970-5333;year=2019;volume=33;issue=3;spage=151;epage=155;aulast=Vinodinterligamentous planepudendal nerve blockropivacaine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Krishnagopal Vinod
Pranjali Kurhekar
Krishnakumar Sharanya
spellingShingle Krishnagopal Vinod
Pranjali Kurhekar
Krishnakumar Sharanya
Randomized trial comparing the incidence of unintended sciatic nerve block following ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block with two different volumes of ropivacaine for hemorrhoidectomy: A pilot study
Indian Journal of Pain
interligamentous plane
pudendal nerve block
ropivacaine
author_facet Krishnagopal Vinod
Pranjali Kurhekar
Krishnakumar Sharanya
author_sort Krishnagopal Vinod
title Randomized trial comparing the incidence of unintended sciatic nerve block following ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block with two different volumes of ropivacaine for hemorrhoidectomy: A pilot study
title_short Randomized trial comparing the incidence of unintended sciatic nerve block following ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block with two different volumes of ropivacaine for hemorrhoidectomy: A pilot study
title_full Randomized trial comparing the incidence of unintended sciatic nerve block following ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block with two different volumes of ropivacaine for hemorrhoidectomy: A pilot study
title_fullStr Randomized trial comparing the incidence of unintended sciatic nerve block following ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block with two different volumes of ropivacaine for hemorrhoidectomy: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Randomized trial comparing the incidence of unintended sciatic nerve block following ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block with two different volumes of ropivacaine for hemorrhoidectomy: A pilot study
title_sort randomized trial comparing the incidence of unintended sciatic nerve block following ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block with two different volumes of ropivacaine for hemorrhoidectomy: a pilot study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Pain
issn 0970-5333
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Aim: To compare the incidence of unintended sciatic nerve block following pudendal nerve block in the interligamentous plane with two different volumes of ropivacaine for post hemorrhoidectomy pain. Materials and Methods: 30 patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy were enrolled for the study and randomly divided into two groups. Prior to the block a scout scan was performed and the pudendal artery, nerve and the sciatic nerve were identified in the interligamentous plane. All the patients received bilateral pudendal nerve block under ultrasound guidance with 5ml of 0.25% ropivacaine in group 1 and 10 ml in group 2. The spread of local anaesthetic to the ipsilateral sciatic nerve was noted under ultrasound imaging. The time of first rescue analgesia (FRA) and total analgesic requirement(TAR) were noted in both groups. The overall patient satisfaction was assessed with a three point scale.The unintended motor and sensory block of the sciatic nerve was noted. Results: The right pudendal artery was visualized in all cases where but left pudendal artery was not visualized in 1 case. The right & left pudendal nerve was visualized in 40% & 46.7% of cases in group I and 40% in both sides of group 2. The incidence of spread of drug towards the right and left sciatic nerve was more in group II (73.3% & 66.6%) than group I (40% & 33.3%). Statistically significant difference was not noted in the time for FRA (P value 0.684) & TAR (P value 0.579). There was no clinically significant sciatic nerve block. Conclusion: We conclude that less volume of local anaesthetic can achieve effective pudendal nerve block minimizing the spread to ipsilateral sciatic nerve.
topic interligamentous plane
pudendal nerve block
ropivacaine
url http://www.indianjpain.org/article.asp?issn=0970-5333;year=2019;volume=33;issue=3;spage=151;epage=155;aulast=Vinod
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnagopalvinod randomizedtrialcomparingtheincidenceofunintendedsciaticnerveblockfollowingultrasoundguidedpudendalnerveblockwithtwodifferentvolumesofropivacaineforhemorrhoidectomyapilotstudy
AT pranjalikurhekar randomizedtrialcomparingtheincidenceofunintendedsciaticnerveblockfollowingultrasoundguidedpudendalnerveblockwithtwodifferentvolumesofropivacaineforhemorrhoidectomyapilotstudy
AT krishnakumarsharanya randomizedtrialcomparingtheincidenceofunintendedsciaticnerveblockfollowingultrasoundguidedpudendalnerveblockwithtwodifferentvolumesofropivacaineforhemorrhoidectomyapilotstudy
_version_ 1724723048921169920