Community <ul>P</ul>references for the <ul>A</ul>llocation &<ul>D</ul>onation of <ul>O</ul>rgans - The PAraDOx Study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irving Michelle, Allen Richard DM, Chadban Steven, Rose John, Jan Stephen, Howard Kirsten, Tong Allison, Wong Germaine, Craig Jonathan C, Cass Alan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-05-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/386
id doaj-44abf5381be6427abd59f1c9d02fe67c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-44abf5381be6427abd59f1c9d02fe67c2020-11-25T00:26:36ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582011-05-0111138610.1186/1471-2458-11-386Community <ul>P</ul>references for the <ul>A</ul>llocation &<ul>D</ul>onation of <ul>O</ul>rgans - The PAraDOx StudyIrving MichelleAllen Richard DMChadban StevenRose JohnJan StephenHoward KirstenTong AllisonWong GermaineCraig Jonathan CCass Alan<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; there appears to be no lack of 'in principle' public support for organ donation.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The PAraDOx Study examines community preferences for organ donation policy in Australia. The aims are to 1) determine which factors influence decisions by individuals to offer their organs for donation and 2) determine the criteria by which the community deems the allocation of donor organs to be fair and equitable. Qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation.</p> <p>Focus group participants from the general community, aged between 18-80, will be purposively sampled to ensure a variety of cultural backgrounds and views on organ donation. Each focus group will include a ranking exercise using a modified nominal group technique. Focus groups of organ recipients, their families, and individuals on a transplant waiting list will also be conducted.</p> <p>Using the qualitative work, a discrete choice study will be designed to quantitatively assess community preferences. Discrete choice methods are based on the premise that goods and services can be described in terms of a number of separate attributes. Respondents are presented with a series of choices where levels of attributes are varied, and a mathematical function is estimated to describe numerically the value respondents attach to different options. Two community surveys will be conducted in approximately 1000 respondents each to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. A mixed logit model will be used; model results will be expressed as parameter estimates (β) and the odds of choosing one option over an alternative. Trade-offs between attributes will also be calculated.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>By providing a better understanding of current community preferences in relation to organ donation and allocation, the PAraDOx study will highlight options for firstly, increasing the rate of organ donation and secondly, allow for more transparent and equitable policies in relation to organ allocation.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/386
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Irving Michelle
Allen Richard DM
Chadban Steven
Rose John
Jan Stephen
Howard Kirsten
Tong Allison
Wong Germaine
Craig Jonathan C
Cass Alan
spellingShingle Irving Michelle
Allen Richard DM
Chadban Steven
Rose John
Jan Stephen
Howard Kirsten
Tong Allison
Wong Germaine
Craig Jonathan C
Cass Alan
Community <ul>P</ul>references for the <ul>A</ul>llocation &<ul>D</ul>onation of <ul>O</ul>rgans - The PAraDOx Study
BMC Public Health
author_facet Irving Michelle
Allen Richard DM
Chadban Steven
Rose John
Jan Stephen
Howard Kirsten
Tong Allison
Wong Germaine
Craig Jonathan C
Cass Alan
author_sort Irving Michelle
title Community <ul>P</ul>references for the <ul>A</ul>llocation &<ul>D</ul>onation of <ul>O</ul>rgans - The PAraDOx Study
title_short Community <ul>P</ul>references for the <ul>A</ul>llocation &<ul>D</ul>onation of <ul>O</ul>rgans - The PAraDOx Study
title_full Community <ul>P</ul>references for the <ul>A</ul>llocation &<ul>D</ul>onation of <ul>O</ul>rgans - The PAraDOx Study
title_fullStr Community <ul>P</ul>references for the <ul>A</ul>llocation &<ul>D</ul>onation of <ul>O</ul>rgans - The PAraDOx Study
title_full_unstemmed Community <ul>P</ul>references for the <ul>A</ul>llocation &<ul>D</ul>onation of <ul>O</ul>rgans - The PAraDOx Study
title_sort community <ul>p</ul>references for the <ul>a</ul>llocation &<ul>d</ul>onation of <ul>o</ul>rgans - the paradox study
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2011-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; there appears to be no lack of 'in principle' public support for organ donation.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The PAraDOx Study examines community preferences for organ donation policy in Australia. The aims are to 1) determine which factors influence decisions by individuals to offer their organs for donation and 2) determine the criteria by which the community deems the allocation of donor organs to be fair and equitable. Qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation.</p> <p>Focus group participants from the general community, aged between 18-80, will be purposively sampled to ensure a variety of cultural backgrounds and views on organ donation. Each focus group will include a ranking exercise using a modified nominal group technique. Focus groups of organ recipients, their families, and individuals on a transplant waiting list will also be conducted.</p> <p>Using the qualitative work, a discrete choice study will be designed to quantitatively assess community preferences. Discrete choice methods are based on the premise that goods and services can be described in terms of a number of separate attributes. Respondents are presented with a series of choices where levels of attributes are varied, and a mathematical function is estimated to describe numerically the value respondents attach to different options. Two community surveys will be conducted in approximately 1000 respondents each to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. A mixed logit model will be used; model results will be expressed as parameter estimates (β) and the odds of choosing one option over an alternative. Trade-offs between attributes will also be calculated.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>By providing a better understanding of current community preferences in relation to organ donation and allocation, the PAraDOx study will highlight options for firstly, increasing the rate of organ donation and secondly, allow for more transparent and equitable policies in relation to organ allocation.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/386
work_keys_str_mv AT irvingmichelle communityulpulreferencesfortheulaulllocationuldulonationofuloulrganstheparadoxstudy
AT allenricharddm communityulpulreferencesfortheulaulllocationuldulonationofuloulrganstheparadoxstudy
AT chadbansteven communityulpulreferencesfortheulaulllocationuldulonationofuloulrganstheparadoxstudy
AT rosejohn communityulpulreferencesfortheulaulllocationuldulonationofuloulrganstheparadoxstudy
AT janstephen communityulpulreferencesfortheulaulllocationuldulonationofuloulrganstheparadoxstudy
AT howardkirsten communityulpulreferencesfortheulaulllocationuldulonationofuloulrganstheparadoxstudy
AT tongallison communityulpulreferencesfortheulaulllocationuldulonationofuloulrganstheparadoxstudy
AT wonggermaine communityulpulreferencesfortheulaulllocationuldulonationofuloulrganstheparadoxstudy
AT craigjonathanc communityulpulreferencesfortheulaulllocationuldulonationofuloulrganstheparadoxstudy
AT cassalan communityulpulreferencesfortheulaulllocationuldulonationofuloulrganstheparadoxstudy
_version_ 1725343790816821248