Appropriate terminology for karst-like phenomena: the problem with ‘pseudokarst’
The practice of referring to certain morphologically karst-like phenomena as ‘pseudokarst’ is problematic, because it ignores basic principles of sound classification, logical naming conventions and accepted geomorphic classifications and terminology. These problems have compounded the difficulty in...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of South Florida Libraries
2013-05-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Speleology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1283&context=ijs |
| Summary: | The practice of referring to certain morphologically karst-like phenomena as ‘pseudokarst’ is problematic, because it ignores basic principles of sound classification, logical naming conventions and accepted geomorphic classifications and terminology. These problems have compounded the difficulty in establishing an accepted classification of ‘pseudokarst’ types. The practice embodies a karst-centric perspective which should be avoided in favour of using conventional geomorphic terminology for non-karstic features. We illustrate this by providing existing conventional terms for many ‘pseudokarst’ types reported in the literature. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0392-6672 1827-806X |