Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors

Abstract Background A Mobile Safety Center (MSC) provides safety resources to families to prevent pediatric injury. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of an MSC on home safety behaviors. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study with 50 parents and guardians re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leah Furman, Stephen Strotmeyer, Christine Vitale, Barbara A. Gaines
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-06-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11073-4
id doaj-44bee559a25149a792ef0b48bf1388df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-44bee559a25149a792ef0b48bf1388df2021-06-13T11:04:52ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582021-06-012111910.1186/s12889-021-11073-4Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviorsLeah Furman0Stephen Strotmeyer1Christine Vitale2Barbara A. Gaines3University of Pittsburgh School of MedicineDepartment of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, UPMC Children’s Hospital of PittsburghDepartment of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, UPMC Children’s Hospital of PittsburghDepartment of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, UPMC Children’s Hospital of PittsburghAbstract Background A Mobile Safety Center (MSC) provides safety resources to families to prevent pediatric injury. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of an MSC on home safety behaviors. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study with 50 parents and guardians recruited at community events attended by an MSC. Participants completed a pre-test assessing demographics and home safety behaviors prior to participating in the MSC’s home safety educational program. We conducted follow-up with participants 4 weeks (follow-up 1) and 6 months (follow-up 2) after their visit to the MSC to reassess home safety behaviors. We used descriptive statistics in addition to Friedman, Wilcoxon sum-rank, and Fisher’s exact testing to analyze respondent demographics and changes in home safety practices. Friedman and Wilcoxon sum-rank testing was performed only for participants who completed all surveys. Results Of our 50 participants, 29 (58%) completed follow-up 1, 30 (60%) completed follow-up 2, and 26 (52%) completed both. Participants were more likely to have a fire-escape plan at follow-up 1 than on the pre-test (p = 0.014). They were also more likely to have the Poison Control Hotline number accessible in their cellphone or near a home phone at follow-up 1 compared to the pre-test (p = 0.002) and follow-up 2 compared to the pre-test (p < 0.001). Families with at least one household member who smoked or used e-cigarettes at any point during the study (n = 16 for the total population, n = 9 for those who completed both surveys) were less likely to have more than two smoke detectors installed at home during the pre-test (p = 0.049). However, this significantly changed across timepoints (p = 0.018), and while 44.4% reported more than two detectors during the pre-test, 88.9% reported this at both follow-ups. Conclusions Home safety education through an MSC positively changed some reported safety behaviors and maintained these changes at long-term follow-up. By encouraging the adoption of better home safety practices, education at an MSC may decrease pediatric injury rates.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11073-4MobileInjuryPreventionPediatricSafety
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leah Furman
Stephen Strotmeyer
Christine Vitale
Barbara A. Gaines
spellingShingle Leah Furman
Stephen Strotmeyer
Christine Vitale
Barbara A. Gaines
Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
BMC Public Health
Mobile
Injury
Prevention
Pediatric
Safety
author_facet Leah Furman
Stephen Strotmeyer
Christine Vitale
Barbara A. Gaines
author_sort Leah Furman
title Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
title_short Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
title_full Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
title_fullStr Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
title_sort evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Background A Mobile Safety Center (MSC) provides safety resources to families to prevent pediatric injury. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of an MSC on home safety behaviors. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study with 50 parents and guardians recruited at community events attended by an MSC. Participants completed a pre-test assessing demographics and home safety behaviors prior to participating in the MSC’s home safety educational program. We conducted follow-up with participants 4 weeks (follow-up 1) and 6 months (follow-up 2) after their visit to the MSC to reassess home safety behaviors. We used descriptive statistics in addition to Friedman, Wilcoxon sum-rank, and Fisher’s exact testing to analyze respondent demographics and changes in home safety practices. Friedman and Wilcoxon sum-rank testing was performed only for participants who completed all surveys. Results Of our 50 participants, 29 (58%) completed follow-up 1, 30 (60%) completed follow-up 2, and 26 (52%) completed both. Participants were more likely to have a fire-escape plan at follow-up 1 than on the pre-test (p = 0.014). They were also more likely to have the Poison Control Hotline number accessible in their cellphone or near a home phone at follow-up 1 compared to the pre-test (p = 0.002) and follow-up 2 compared to the pre-test (p < 0.001). Families with at least one household member who smoked or used e-cigarettes at any point during the study (n = 16 for the total population, n = 9 for those who completed both surveys) were less likely to have more than two smoke detectors installed at home during the pre-test (p = 0.049). However, this significantly changed across timepoints (p = 0.018), and while 44.4% reported more than two detectors during the pre-test, 88.9% reported this at both follow-ups. Conclusions Home safety education through an MSC positively changed some reported safety behaviors and maintained these changes at long-term follow-up. By encouraging the adoption of better home safety practices, education at an MSC may decrease pediatric injury rates.
topic Mobile
Injury
Prevention
Pediatric
Safety
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11073-4
work_keys_str_mv AT leahfurman evaluationofamobilesafetycentersimpactonpediatrichomesafetybehaviors
AT stephenstrotmeyer evaluationofamobilesafetycentersimpactonpediatrichomesafetybehaviors
AT christinevitale evaluationofamobilesafetycentersimpactonpediatrichomesafetybehaviors
AT barbaraagaines evaluationofamobilesafetycentersimpactonpediatrichomesafetybehaviors
_version_ 1721380232319991808