MSS/1: Single‐Station and Single‐Event Marsquake Inversion

Abstract SEIS, the seismometer of the InSight mission, which landed on Mars on 26 November 2018, is monitoring the seismic activity of the planet. The goal of the Mars Structure Service (MSS) is to provide, as a mission product, the first average 1‐D velocity model of Mars from the recorded InSight...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mélanie Drilleau, Éric Beucler, Philippe Lognonné, Mark P. Panning, Brigitte Knapmeyer‐Endrun, W. Bruce Banerdt, Caroline Beghein, Savas Ceylan, Martin vanDriel, Rakshit Joshi, Taichi Kawamura, Amir Khan, Sabrina Menina, Attilio Rivoldini, Henri Samuel, Simon Stähler, Haotian Xu, Mickaël Bonnin, John Clinton, Domenico Giardini, Balthasar Kenda, Vedran Lekic, Antoine Mocquet, Naomi Murdoch, Martin Schimmel, Suzanne E. Smrekar, Éléonore Stutzmann, Benoit Tauzin, Saikiran Tharimena
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2020-12-01
Series:Earth and Space Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001118
id doaj-44c55f60f73149c3be76f9a1f5b97d80
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mélanie Drilleau
Éric Beucler
Philippe Lognonné
Mark P. Panning
Brigitte Knapmeyer‐Endrun
W. Bruce Banerdt
Caroline Beghein
Savas Ceylan
Martin vanDriel
Rakshit Joshi
Taichi Kawamura
Amir Khan
Sabrina Menina
Attilio Rivoldini
Henri Samuel
Simon Stähler
Haotian Xu
Mickaël Bonnin
John Clinton
Domenico Giardini
Balthasar Kenda
Vedran Lekic
Antoine Mocquet
Naomi Murdoch
Martin Schimmel
Suzanne E. Smrekar
Éléonore Stutzmann
Benoit Tauzin
Saikiran Tharimena
spellingShingle Mélanie Drilleau
Éric Beucler
Philippe Lognonné
Mark P. Panning
Brigitte Knapmeyer‐Endrun
W. Bruce Banerdt
Caroline Beghein
Savas Ceylan
Martin vanDriel
Rakshit Joshi
Taichi Kawamura
Amir Khan
Sabrina Menina
Attilio Rivoldini
Henri Samuel
Simon Stähler
Haotian Xu
Mickaël Bonnin
John Clinton
Domenico Giardini
Balthasar Kenda
Vedran Lekic
Antoine Mocquet
Naomi Murdoch
Martin Schimmel
Suzanne E. Smrekar
Éléonore Stutzmann
Benoit Tauzin
Saikiran Tharimena
MSS/1: Single‐Station and Single‐Event Marsquake Inversion
Earth and Space Science
InSight
inversion
seismology
author_facet Mélanie Drilleau
Éric Beucler
Philippe Lognonné
Mark P. Panning
Brigitte Knapmeyer‐Endrun
W. Bruce Banerdt
Caroline Beghein
Savas Ceylan
Martin vanDriel
Rakshit Joshi
Taichi Kawamura
Amir Khan
Sabrina Menina
Attilio Rivoldini
Henri Samuel
Simon Stähler
Haotian Xu
Mickaël Bonnin
John Clinton
Domenico Giardini
Balthasar Kenda
Vedran Lekic
Antoine Mocquet
Naomi Murdoch
Martin Schimmel
Suzanne E. Smrekar
Éléonore Stutzmann
Benoit Tauzin
Saikiran Tharimena
author_sort Mélanie Drilleau
title MSS/1: Single‐Station and Single‐Event Marsquake Inversion
title_short MSS/1: Single‐Station and Single‐Event Marsquake Inversion
title_full MSS/1: Single‐Station and Single‐Event Marsquake Inversion
title_fullStr MSS/1: Single‐Station and Single‐Event Marsquake Inversion
title_full_unstemmed MSS/1: Single‐Station and Single‐Event Marsquake Inversion
title_sort mss/1: single‐station and single‐event marsquake inversion
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
series Earth and Space Science
issn 2333-5084
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Abstract SEIS, the seismometer of the InSight mission, which landed on Mars on 26 November 2018, is monitoring the seismic activity of the planet. The goal of the Mars Structure Service (MSS) is to provide, as a mission product, the first average 1‐D velocity model of Mars from the recorded InSight data. Prior to the mission, methodologies have been developed and tested to allow the location of the seismic events and estimation of the radial structure, using surface waves and body waves arrival times, and receiver functions. The paper describes these validation tests and compares the performance of the different algorithms to constrain the velocity model below the InSight station and estimate the 1‐D average model over the great circle path between source and receiver. These tests were performed in the frame of a blind test, during which synthetic data were inverted. In order to propagate the data uncertainties on the output model distribution, Bayesian inversion techniques are mainly used. The limitations and strengths of the methods are assessed. The results show the potential of the MSS approach to retrieve the structure of the crust and underlying mantle. However, at this time, large quakes with clear surface waves have not yet been recorded by SEIS, which makes the estimation of the 1‐D average seismic velocity model challenging. Additional locatable events, especially at large epicentral distances, and development of new techniques to fully investigate the data, will ultimately provide more constraints on the crust and mantle of Mars.
topic InSight
inversion
seismology
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001118
work_keys_str_mv AT melaniedrilleau mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT ericbeucler mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT philippelognonne mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT markppanning mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT brigitteknapmeyerendrun mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT wbrucebanerdt mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT carolinebeghein mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT savasceylan mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT martinvandriel mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT rakshitjoshi mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT taichikawamura mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT amirkhan mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT sabrinamenina mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT attiliorivoldini mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT henrisamuel mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT simonstahler mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT haotianxu mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT mickaelbonnin mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT johnclinton mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT domenicogiardini mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT balthasarkenda mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT vedranlekic mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT antoinemocquet mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT naomimurdoch mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT martinschimmel mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT suzanneesmrekar mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT eleonorestutzmann mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT benoittauzin mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
AT saikirantharimena mss1singlestationandsingleeventmarsquakeinversion
_version_ 1724246685422452736
spelling doaj-44c55f60f73149c3be76f9a1f5b97d802021-03-01T10:38:57ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth and Space Science2333-50842020-12-01712n/an/a10.1029/2020EA001118MSS/1: Single‐Station and Single‐Event Marsquake InversionMélanie Drilleau0Éric Beucler1Philippe Lognonné2Mark P. Panning3Brigitte Knapmeyer‐Endrun4W. Bruce Banerdt5Caroline Beghein6Savas Ceylan7Martin vanDriel8Rakshit Joshi9Taichi Kawamura10Amir Khan11Sabrina Menina12Attilio Rivoldini13Henri Samuel14Simon Stähler15Haotian Xu16Mickaël Bonnin17John Clinton18Domenico Giardini19Balthasar Kenda20Vedran Lekic21Antoine Mocquet22Naomi Murdoch23Martin Schimmel24Suzanne E. Smrekar25Éléonore Stutzmann26Benoit Tauzin27Saikiran Tharimena28Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS F‐7500511 Université Paris Diderot Paris FranceLaboratoire de Planétologie et de Géodynamique Université de Nantes, Université d'Angers Nantes FranceInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS F‐7500511 Université Paris Diderot Paris FranceJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USABensberg Observatory University of Cologne Cologne GermanyJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USADepartment of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences University of California Los Angeles CA USAInstitute for Geophysics ETH Zürich Zürich SwitzerlandInstitute for Geophysics ETH Zürich Zürich SwitzerlandMax Planck Institute for Solar System Research Göttingen GermanyInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS F‐7500511 Université Paris Diderot Paris FranceInstitute for Geophysics ETH Zürich Zürich SwitzerlandInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS F‐7500511 Université Paris Diderot Paris FranceRoyal Observatory Belgium Brussels BelgiumInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS F‐7500511 Université Paris Diderot Paris FranceInstitute for Geophysics ETH Zürich Zürich SwitzerlandDepartment of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences University of California Los Angeles CA USALaboratoire de Planétologie et de Géodynamique Université de Nantes, Université d'Angers Nantes FranceInstitute for Geophysics ETH Zürich Zürich SwitzerlandInstitute for Geophysics ETH Zürich Zürich SwitzerlandInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS F‐7500511 Université Paris Diderot Paris FranceDepartment of Geology University of Maryland College Park MD USALaboratoire de Planétologie et de Géodynamique Université de Nantes, Université d'Angers Nantes FranceISAE‐SUPAERO, Toulouse University Toulouse FranceICTJA‐CSIC Barcelona SpainJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USAInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS F‐7500511 Université Paris Diderot Paris FranceLaboratoire de Sciences de la Terre, Universit de Lyon I, CNRS and Ecole Normale Suprieure de Lyon, UMR5570 Villeurbanne FranceJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USAAbstract SEIS, the seismometer of the InSight mission, which landed on Mars on 26 November 2018, is monitoring the seismic activity of the planet. The goal of the Mars Structure Service (MSS) is to provide, as a mission product, the first average 1‐D velocity model of Mars from the recorded InSight data. Prior to the mission, methodologies have been developed and tested to allow the location of the seismic events and estimation of the radial structure, using surface waves and body waves arrival times, and receiver functions. The paper describes these validation tests and compares the performance of the different algorithms to constrain the velocity model below the InSight station and estimate the 1‐D average model over the great circle path between source and receiver. These tests were performed in the frame of a blind test, during which synthetic data were inverted. In order to propagate the data uncertainties on the output model distribution, Bayesian inversion techniques are mainly used. The limitations and strengths of the methods are assessed. The results show the potential of the MSS approach to retrieve the structure of the crust and underlying mantle. However, at this time, large quakes with clear surface waves have not yet been recorded by SEIS, which makes the estimation of the 1‐D average seismic velocity model challenging. Additional locatable events, especially at large epicentral distances, and development of new techniques to fully investigate the data, will ultimately provide more constraints on the crust and mantle of Mars.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001118InSightinversionseismology