Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population

Abstract Background According to the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group recommendations, boys and girls have different growth trajectories after birth. Our aim was to develop gender-specific fetal growth curves in a low-risk population and to compare immediate birth outcomes. Methods First...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sander Galjaard, Lieveke Ameye, Christoph C. Lees, Anne Pexsters, Tom Bourne, Dirk Timmerman, Roland Devlieger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-09-01
Series:Biology of Sex Differences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13293-019-0261-7
id doaj-44cd676385084b7f9bbf34d8dfbdb0f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-44cd676385084b7f9bbf34d8dfbdb0f52020-11-25T03:40:07ZengBMCBiology of Sex Differences2042-64102019-09-0110111210.1186/s13293-019-0261-7Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian populationSander Galjaard0Lieveke Ameye1Christoph C. Lees2Anne Pexsters3Tom Bourne4Dirk Timmerman5Roland Devlieger6KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration: Pregnancy, Fetus and Neonate, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals LeuvenDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU LeuvenKU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration: Pregnancy, Fetus and Neonate, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals LeuvenKU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration: Pregnancy, Fetus and Neonate, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals LeuvenKU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration: Pregnancy, Fetus and Neonate, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals LeuvenKU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration: Pregnancy, Fetus and Neonate, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals LeuvenKU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration: Pregnancy, Fetus and Neonate, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals LeuvenAbstract Background According to the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group recommendations, boys and girls have different growth trajectories after birth. Our aim was to develop gender-specific fetal growth curves in a low-risk population and to compare immediate birth outcomes. Methods First, second, and third trimester fetal ultrasound examinations were conducted between 2002 and 2012. The data was selected using the following criteria: routine examinations in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies, Caucasian ethnicity, and confirmation of gestational age by a crown-rump length (CRL) measurement in the first trimester. Generalized Additive Model for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) was used to align the time frames of the longitudinal fetal measurements, corresponding with the methods of the postnatal growth curves of the WHO MGRS Group. Results A total of 27,680 complete scans were selected from the astraia© ultrasound database representing 12,368 pregnancies. Gender-specific fetal growth curves for biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) were derived. The HC and BPD were significantly larger in boys compared to girls from 20 weeks of gestation onwards (p < 0.001) equating to a 3-day difference at 20–24 weeks. Boys were significantly heavier, longer, and had greater head circumference than girls (p < 0.001) at birth. The Apgar score at 1 min (p = 0.01) and arterial cord pH (p < 0.001) were lower in boys. Conclusions These longitudinal fetal growth curves for the first time allow integration with neonatal and pediatric WHO gender-specific growth curves. Boys exceed head growth halfway of the pregnancy, and immediate birth outcomes are worse in boys than girls. Gender difference in intrauterine growth is sufficiently distinct to have a clinically important effect on fetal weight estimation but also on the second trimester dating. Therefore, these differences might already play a role in early fetal or immediate neonatal management.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13293-019-0261-7Fetal anthropometric gender differencesPrenatal growthBirth outcomesPerinatal and neonatal management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sander Galjaard
Lieveke Ameye
Christoph C. Lees
Anne Pexsters
Tom Bourne
Dirk Timmerman
Roland Devlieger
spellingShingle Sander Galjaard
Lieveke Ameye
Christoph C. Lees
Anne Pexsters
Tom Bourne
Dirk Timmerman
Roland Devlieger
Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population
Biology of Sex Differences
Fetal anthropometric gender differences
Prenatal growth
Birth outcomes
Perinatal and neonatal management
author_facet Sander Galjaard
Lieveke Ameye
Christoph C. Lees
Anne Pexsters
Tom Bourne
Dirk Timmerman
Roland Devlieger
author_sort Sander Galjaard
title Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population
title_short Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population
title_full Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population
title_fullStr Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population
title_sort sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk caucasian population
publisher BMC
series Biology of Sex Differences
issn 2042-6410
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Abstract Background According to the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group recommendations, boys and girls have different growth trajectories after birth. Our aim was to develop gender-specific fetal growth curves in a low-risk population and to compare immediate birth outcomes. Methods First, second, and third trimester fetal ultrasound examinations were conducted between 2002 and 2012. The data was selected using the following criteria: routine examinations in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies, Caucasian ethnicity, and confirmation of gestational age by a crown-rump length (CRL) measurement in the first trimester. Generalized Additive Model for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) was used to align the time frames of the longitudinal fetal measurements, corresponding with the methods of the postnatal growth curves of the WHO MGRS Group. Results A total of 27,680 complete scans were selected from the astraia© ultrasound database representing 12,368 pregnancies. Gender-specific fetal growth curves for biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) were derived. The HC and BPD were significantly larger in boys compared to girls from 20 weeks of gestation onwards (p < 0.001) equating to a 3-day difference at 20–24 weeks. Boys were significantly heavier, longer, and had greater head circumference than girls (p < 0.001) at birth. The Apgar score at 1 min (p = 0.01) and arterial cord pH (p < 0.001) were lower in boys. Conclusions These longitudinal fetal growth curves for the first time allow integration with neonatal and pediatric WHO gender-specific growth curves. Boys exceed head growth halfway of the pregnancy, and immediate birth outcomes are worse in boys than girls. Gender difference in intrauterine growth is sufficiently distinct to have a clinically important effect on fetal weight estimation but also on the second trimester dating. Therefore, these differences might already play a role in early fetal or immediate neonatal management.
topic Fetal anthropometric gender differences
Prenatal growth
Birth outcomes
Perinatal and neonatal management
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13293-019-0261-7
work_keys_str_mv AT sandergaljaard sexdifferencesinfetalgrowthandimmediatebirthoutcomesinalowriskcaucasianpopulation
AT lievekeameye sexdifferencesinfetalgrowthandimmediatebirthoutcomesinalowriskcaucasianpopulation
AT christophclees sexdifferencesinfetalgrowthandimmediatebirthoutcomesinalowriskcaucasianpopulation
AT annepexsters sexdifferencesinfetalgrowthandimmediatebirthoutcomesinalowriskcaucasianpopulation
AT tombourne sexdifferencesinfetalgrowthandimmediatebirthoutcomesinalowriskcaucasianpopulation
AT dirktimmerman sexdifferencesinfetalgrowthandimmediatebirthoutcomesinalowriskcaucasianpopulation
AT rolanddevlieger sexdifferencesinfetalgrowthandimmediatebirthoutcomesinalowriskcaucasianpopulation
_version_ 1724536286568513536