Psychological characteristics of future helping professionals: Empathy and attachment of psychology students

In this study we investigated whether psychology students differ than students who have chosen non-helping professions in psychological features important for helping activities: attachment and empathy. The sample consisted of psychology students from Belgrade and Novi Sad (N=452) and students f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dimitrijević Aleksandar, Hanak Nataša, Milojević Sonja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Drustvo Psihologa Srbije 2011-01-01
Series:Psihologija
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2011/0048-57051102097D.pdf
id doaj-44fb5cbb48944fe7819082e6aff90ee8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-44fb5cbb48944fe7819082e6aff90ee82020-11-25T01:26:17ZengDrustvo Psihologa SrbijePsihologija0048-57052011-01-014429711510.2298/PSI1102097DPsychological characteristics of future helping professionals: Empathy and attachment of psychology studentsDimitrijević AleksandarHanak NatašaMilojević SonjaIn this study we investigated whether psychology students differ than students who have chosen non-helping professions in psychological features important for helping activities: attachment and empathy. The sample consisted of psychology students from Belgrade and Novi Sad (N=452) and students from several Belgrade University faculties for non-helping professions. The revised version of Attachment Questionnaire was used for assessment of attachment, while empathy was assessed by Empathy Quotient. The results confirmed hypotheses about the greater prevalence of secure attachment pattern, higher empathic capacity, better mentalizing, and more positive model of the other among the future helpers. These differences between student groups are present at the enrolment, with gender controlled. Finally, the prevalence of the secure attachment pattern and high empathy scores rises with the years spent at studying psychology. We concluded that psychology studies are chosen by persons with higher motivation and capacities for helping professions. Although women outnumber men, differences between the future helping professionals and others cannot be explained by the gender structure of the sample, since men in the helping professions have better results than women in the nonhelping ones.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2011/0048-57051102097D.pdfpsychology studentshelping professionsempathyattachmentmentalizing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dimitrijević Aleksandar
Hanak Nataša
Milojević Sonja
spellingShingle Dimitrijević Aleksandar
Hanak Nataša
Milojević Sonja
Psychological characteristics of future helping professionals: Empathy and attachment of psychology students
Psihologija
psychology students
helping professions
empathy
attachment
mentalizing
author_facet Dimitrijević Aleksandar
Hanak Nataša
Milojević Sonja
author_sort Dimitrijević Aleksandar
title Psychological characteristics of future helping professionals: Empathy and attachment of psychology students
title_short Psychological characteristics of future helping professionals: Empathy and attachment of psychology students
title_full Psychological characteristics of future helping professionals: Empathy and attachment of psychology students
title_fullStr Psychological characteristics of future helping professionals: Empathy and attachment of psychology students
title_full_unstemmed Psychological characteristics of future helping professionals: Empathy and attachment of psychology students
title_sort psychological characteristics of future helping professionals: empathy and attachment of psychology students
publisher Drustvo Psihologa Srbije
series Psihologija
issn 0048-5705
publishDate 2011-01-01
description In this study we investigated whether psychology students differ than students who have chosen non-helping professions in psychological features important for helping activities: attachment and empathy. The sample consisted of psychology students from Belgrade and Novi Sad (N=452) and students from several Belgrade University faculties for non-helping professions. The revised version of Attachment Questionnaire was used for assessment of attachment, while empathy was assessed by Empathy Quotient. The results confirmed hypotheses about the greater prevalence of secure attachment pattern, higher empathic capacity, better mentalizing, and more positive model of the other among the future helpers. These differences between student groups are present at the enrolment, with gender controlled. Finally, the prevalence of the secure attachment pattern and high empathy scores rises with the years spent at studying psychology. We concluded that psychology studies are chosen by persons with higher motivation and capacities for helping professions. Although women outnumber men, differences between the future helping professionals and others cannot be explained by the gender structure of the sample, since men in the helping professions have better results than women in the nonhelping ones.
topic psychology students
helping professions
empathy
attachment
mentalizing
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2011/0048-57051102097D.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dimitrijevicaleksandar psychologicalcharacteristicsoffuturehelpingprofessionalsempathyandattachmentofpsychologystudents
AT hanaknatasa psychologicalcharacteristicsoffuturehelpingprofessionalsempathyandattachmentofpsychologystudents
AT milojevicsonja psychologicalcharacteristicsoffuturehelpingprofessionalsempathyandattachmentofpsychologystudents
_version_ 1725110000372678656