MICS-Asia III: overview of model intercomparison and evaluation of acid deposition over Asia

<p>The Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia (MICS-Asia) phase III was conducted to promote understanding of regional air quality and climate change in Asia, which have received growing attention due to the huge amount of anthropogenic emissions worldwide. This study provides an overview of ac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Itahashi, B. Ge, K. Sato, J. S. Fu, X. Wang, K. Yamaji, T. Nagashima, J. Li, M. Kajino, H. Liao, M. Zhang, Z. Wang, M. Li, J. Kurokawa, G. R. Carmichael
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-03-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/2667/2020/acp-20-2667-2020.pdf
id doaj-44fee0dc13724aa3a4b8b6de4205456f
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Itahashi
S. Itahashi
B. Ge
B. Ge
B. Ge
K. Sato
J. S. Fu
X. Wang
K. Yamaji
T. Nagashima
T. Nagashima
J. Li
J. Li
J. Li
M. Kajino
M. Kajino
H. Liao
M. Zhang
M. Zhang
M. Zhang
Z. Wang
Z. Wang
M. Li
J. Kurokawa
G. R. Carmichael
Z. Wang
Z. Wang
Z. Wang
spellingShingle S. Itahashi
S. Itahashi
B. Ge
B. Ge
B. Ge
K. Sato
J. S. Fu
X. Wang
K. Yamaji
T. Nagashima
T. Nagashima
J. Li
J. Li
J. Li
M. Kajino
M. Kajino
H. Liao
M. Zhang
M. Zhang
M. Zhang
Z. Wang
Z. Wang
M. Li
J. Kurokawa
G. R. Carmichael
Z. Wang
Z. Wang
Z. Wang
MICS-Asia III: overview of model intercomparison and evaluation of acid deposition over Asia
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet S. Itahashi
S. Itahashi
B. Ge
B. Ge
B. Ge
K. Sato
J. S. Fu
X. Wang
K. Yamaji
T. Nagashima
T. Nagashima
J. Li
J. Li
J. Li
M. Kajino
M. Kajino
H. Liao
M. Zhang
M. Zhang
M. Zhang
Z. Wang
Z. Wang
M. Li
J. Kurokawa
G. R. Carmichael
Z. Wang
Z. Wang
Z. Wang
author_sort S. Itahashi
title MICS-Asia III: overview of model intercomparison and evaluation of acid deposition over Asia
title_short MICS-Asia III: overview of model intercomparison and evaluation of acid deposition over Asia
title_full MICS-Asia III: overview of model intercomparison and evaluation of acid deposition over Asia
title_fullStr MICS-Asia III: overview of model intercomparison and evaluation of acid deposition over Asia
title_full_unstemmed MICS-Asia III: overview of model intercomparison and evaluation of acid deposition over Asia
title_sort mics-asia iii: overview of model intercomparison and evaluation of acid deposition over asia
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2020-03-01
description <p>The Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia (MICS-Asia) phase III was conducted to promote understanding of regional air quality and climate change in Asia, which have received growing attention due to the huge amount of anthropogenic emissions worldwide. This study provides an overview of acid deposition. Specifically, dry and wet deposition of the following species was analyzed: S (sulfate aerosol, sulfur dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">SO<sub>2</sub></span>), and sulfuric acid (<span class="inline-formula">H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></span>)), N (nitrate aerosol, nitrogen monoxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">NO<sub>2</sub></span>), and nitric acid (<span class="inline-formula">HNO<sub>3</sub></span>)), and A (ammonium aerosol and ammonia (<span class="inline-formula">NH<sub>3</sub></span>)). The wet deposition simulated by a total of nine models was analyzed and evaluated using ground observation data from the Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia (EANET). In the phase III study, the number of observation sites was increased from 37 in the phase II study to 54, and southeast Asian countries were newly added. Additionally, whereas the analysis period was limited to representative months of each season in MICS-Asia phase II, the phase III study analyzed the full year of 2010. The scope of this overview mainly focuses<span id="page2668"/> on the annual accumulated deposition. In general, models can capture the observed wet deposition over Asia but underestimate the wet deposition of S and A, and show large differences in the wet deposition of N. Furthermore, the ratio of wet deposition to the total deposition (the sum of dry and wet deposition) was investigated in order to understand the role of important processes in the total deposition. The general dominance of wet deposition over Asia and attributions from dry deposition over land were consistently found in all models. Then, total deposition maps over 13 countries participating in EANET were produced, and the balance between deposition and anthropogenic emissions was calculated. Excesses of deposition, rather than of anthropogenic emissions, were found over Japan, northern Asia, and southeast Asia, indicating the possibility of long-range transport within and outside of Asia, as well as other emission sources. To improve the ability of models to capture the observed wet deposition, two approaches were attempted, namely, ensemble and precipitation adjustment. The ensemble approach was effective at modulating the differences in performance among models, and the precipitation-adjusted approach demonstrated that the model performance for precipitation played a key role in better simulating wet deposition. Finally, the lessons learned from the phase III study and future perspectives for phase IV are summarized.</p>
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/2667/2020/acp-20-2667-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sitahashi micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT sitahashi micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT bge micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT bge micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT bge micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT ksato micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT jsfu micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT xwang micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT kyamaji micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT tnagashima micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT tnagashima micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT jli micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT jli micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT jli micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT mkajino micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT mkajino micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT hliao micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT mzhang micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT mzhang micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT mzhang micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT zwang micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT zwang micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT mli micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT jkurokawa micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT grcarmichael micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT zwang micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT zwang micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
AT zwang micsasiaiiioverviewofmodelintercomparisonandevaluationofaciddepositionoverasia
_version_ 1725330032919838720
spelling doaj-44fee0dc13724aa3a4b8b6de4205456f2020-11-25T00:29:46ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242020-03-01202667269310.5194/acp-20-2667-2020MICS-Asia III: overview of model intercomparison and evaluation of acid deposition over AsiaS. Itahashi0S. Itahashi1B. Ge2B. Ge3B. Ge4K. Sato5J. S. Fu6X. Wang7K. Yamaji8T. Nagashima9T. Nagashima10J. Li11J. Li12J. Li13M. Kajino14M. Kajino15H. Liao16M. Zhang17M. Zhang18M. Zhang19Z. Wang20Z. Wang21M. Li22J. Kurokawa23G. R. Carmichael24Z. Wang25Z. Wang26Z. Wang27Environmental Science Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Abiko, Chiba 270–1194, JapanMeteorological Research Institute (MRI), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0052, JapanState Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100029, ChinaCollage of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaCenter for Excellence in Urban Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Xiamen 361021, ChinaAsia Center for Air Pollution Research (ACAP), 1182 Sowa, Nishi-ku, Niigata, Niigata 950–2144, JapanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USAGuangdong-Hongkong-Macau Joint Laboratory of Collaborative Innovation for Environmental Quality, Institute for Environment and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510275, ChinaGraduate School of Maritime Sciences, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo 658–0022, JapanNational Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–8506, JapanFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–8572, JapanState Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100029, ChinaCollage of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaCenter for Excellence in Urban Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Xiamen 361021, ChinaMeteorological Research Institute (MRI), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0052, JapanFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–8572, JapanJiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100029, ChinaCollage of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaCenter for Excellence in Urban Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Xiamen 361021, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100029, ChinaResearch Institute for Applied Mechanics (RIAM), Kyushu University, Kasuga, Fukuoka 816–8580, JapanMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaAsia Center for Air Pollution Research (ACAP), 1182 Sowa, Nishi-ku, Niigata, Niigata 950–2144, JapanCenter for Global and Regional Environmental Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USAState Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100029, ChinaCollage of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaCenter for Excellence in Urban Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Xiamen 361021, China<p>The Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia (MICS-Asia) phase III was conducted to promote understanding of regional air quality and climate change in Asia, which have received growing attention due to the huge amount of anthropogenic emissions worldwide. This study provides an overview of acid deposition. Specifically, dry and wet deposition of the following species was analyzed: S (sulfate aerosol, sulfur dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">SO<sub>2</sub></span>), and sulfuric acid (<span class="inline-formula">H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></span>)), N (nitrate aerosol, nitrogen monoxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">NO<sub>2</sub></span>), and nitric acid (<span class="inline-formula">HNO<sub>3</sub></span>)), and A (ammonium aerosol and ammonia (<span class="inline-formula">NH<sub>3</sub></span>)). The wet deposition simulated by a total of nine models was analyzed and evaluated using ground observation data from the Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia (EANET). In the phase III study, the number of observation sites was increased from 37 in the phase II study to 54, and southeast Asian countries were newly added. Additionally, whereas the analysis period was limited to representative months of each season in MICS-Asia phase II, the phase III study analyzed the full year of 2010. The scope of this overview mainly focuses<span id="page2668"/> on the annual accumulated deposition. In general, models can capture the observed wet deposition over Asia but underestimate the wet deposition of S and A, and show large differences in the wet deposition of N. Furthermore, the ratio of wet deposition to the total deposition (the sum of dry and wet deposition) was investigated in order to understand the role of important processes in the total deposition. The general dominance of wet deposition over Asia and attributions from dry deposition over land were consistently found in all models. Then, total deposition maps over 13 countries participating in EANET were produced, and the balance between deposition and anthropogenic emissions was calculated. Excesses of deposition, rather than of anthropogenic emissions, were found over Japan, northern Asia, and southeast Asia, indicating the possibility of long-range transport within and outside of Asia, as well as other emission sources. To improve the ability of models to capture the observed wet deposition, two approaches were attempted, namely, ensemble and precipitation adjustment. The ensemble approach was effective at modulating the differences in performance among models, and the precipitation-adjusted approach demonstrated that the model performance for precipitation played a key role in better simulating wet deposition. Finally, the lessons learned from the phase III study and future perspectives for phase IV are summarized.</p>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/2667/2020/acp-20-2667-2020.pdf