The Limits of Redistributive School Finance Policy in South Africa

Since the end of apartheid, South Africa has embarked on extensive reforms aimed at promoting social cohesion, including progressive educational finance policy (e.g., the no-fee school policy) intended to redress historical inequalities. Because improving equality in and through education is vital t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hatch, Rachel, Buckner, Elizabeth, Omoeva, Carina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Inter-agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE) 2017-01-01
Series:Journal on Education in Emergencies
Online Access:https://archive.nyu.edu/handle/2451/39663
id doaj-451aeef65fba4ebebd78c88fceb1c70a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-451aeef65fba4ebebd78c88fceb1c70a2020-11-25T03:44:23ZengInter-agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE)Journal on Education in Emergencies2518-68332017-01-01317910.17609/N85H29The Limits of Redistributive School Finance Policy in South AfricaHatch, RachelBuckner, ElizabethOmoeva, CarinaSince the end of apartheid, South Africa has embarked on extensive reforms aimed at promoting social cohesion, including progressive educational finance policy (e.g., the no-fee school policy) intended to redress historical inequalities. Because improving equality in and through education is vital to social cohesion, this case study examines whether the no-fee school policy has equalized—or is perceived to have equalized—school resources and educational opportunities in basic education. Using a mixed-methods approach that draws on household and school survey data and in-depth interviews, we find that the no-fee school policy has reduced the financial burden on black South Africans but that wide gaps in school resources remain. Moreover, we find that the concentration of black students in schools in the poorest areas and of white students in schools in the wealthiest areas rose between 2003 and 2013, and that some black South Africans are dissatisfied with their poor access to elite schools and the superior educational opportunities they offer. Our study argues that South Africa's current school finance policies may be better characterized as pro-poor than redistributive, and points to implications for social cohesion.https://archive.nyu.edu/handle/2451/39663
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hatch, Rachel
Buckner, Elizabeth
Omoeva, Carina
spellingShingle Hatch, Rachel
Buckner, Elizabeth
Omoeva, Carina
The Limits of Redistributive School Finance Policy in South Africa
Journal on Education in Emergencies
author_facet Hatch, Rachel
Buckner, Elizabeth
Omoeva, Carina
author_sort Hatch, Rachel
title The Limits of Redistributive School Finance Policy in South Africa
title_short The Limits of Redistributive School Finance Policy in South Africa
title_full The Limits of Redistributive School Finance Policy in South Africa
title_fullStr The Limits of Redistributive School Finance Policy in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed The Limits of Redistributive School Finance Policy in South Africa
title_sort limits of redistributive school finance policy in south africa
publisher Inter-agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE)
series Journal on Education in Emergencies
issn 2518-6833
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Since the end of apartheid, South Africa has embarked on extensive reforms aimed at promoting social cohesion, including progressive educational finance policy (e.g., the no-fee school policy) intended to redress historical inequalities. Because improving equality in and through education is vital to social cohesion, this case study examines whether the no-fee school policy has equalized—or is perceived to have equalized—school resources and educational opportunities in basic education. Using a mixed-methods approach that draws on household and school survey data and in-depth interviews, we find that the no-fee school policy has reduced the financial burden on black South Africans but that wide gaps in school resources remain. Moreover, we find that the concentration of black students in schools in the poorest areas and of white students in schools in the wealthiest areas rose between 2003 and 2013, and that some black South Africans are dissatisfied with their poor access to elite schools and the superior educational opportunities they offer. Our study argues that South Africa's current school finance policies may be better characterized as pro-poor than redistributive, and points to implications for social cohesion.
url https://archive.nyu.edu/handle/2451/39663
work_keys_str_mv AT hatchrachel thelimitsofredistributiveschoolfinancepolicyinsouthafrica
AT bucknerelizabeth thelimitsofredistributiveschoolfinancepolicyinsouthafrica
AT omoevacarina thelimitsofredistributiveschoolfinancepolicyinsouthafrica
AT hatchrachel limitsofredistributiveschoolfinancepolicyinsouthafrica
AT bucknerelizabeth limitsofredistributiveschoolfinancepolicyinsouthafrica
AT omoevacarina limitsofredistributiveschoolfinancepolicyinsouthafrica
_version_ 1724515367221460992