Beyond proximity: Consequentialist Ethics and System Dynamics

Consequentialism is a moral philosophy that maintains that the moral worth of an action is determined by the consequences it has for the welfare of a society. Consequences of model design are a part of the model lifecycle that is often neglected. This paper investigates the issue using system dynam...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Erika Palmer
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Norwegian University of Science and Technology Library 2017-05-01
Series:Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/1978
id doaj-4521ad3948b9408cb6076107030123bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4521ad3948b9408cb6076107030123bd2020-11-25T02:45:36ZdanNorwegian University of Science and Technology LibraryEtikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics1890-39911890-40092017-05-0111110.5324/eip.v11i1.1978Beyond proximity: Consequentialist Ethics and System DynamicsErika Palmer0University of Bergen Consequentialism is a moral philosophy that maintains that the moral worth of an action is determined by the consequences it has for the welfare of a society. Consequences of model design are a part of the model lifecycle that is often neglected. This paper investigates the issue using system dynamics modeling as an example. Since a system dynamics model is a product of the modeler’s design decisions, the modeler should consider the life cycle consequences of using the model. Seen from a consequentialist perspective, the consequences of policies developed from system dynamics models determine the model’s moral value (ethical/unethical). This concept is explored by discussing model uncertainty from an engineering perspective. In this perspective, the ethical considerations shift from the behavior of the modeler (and away from validation) to the model itself and the model’s inherent uncertainty. When the ethical considerations are taken away from the modeler and directed to what the model does, the ethical boundaries extend beyond the proximity of the model. This discussion renews the ethics conversation in system dynamics by considering this shift in philosophical perspective, and investigates how consequentialist moral philosophy applies to the modeling process and in communicating with decision-makers. A model of social assistance in Norway in the context of immigration pressures illustrates some possibilities for addressing these ethical concerns. This paper argues for an ethical framework, or at the very least, an ethical conversation within the field of system dynamics. Article first published online: 25 FEB 2017 https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/1978System dynamicsconsequentialismphilosophy of engineeringmodeling ethics
collection DOAJ
language Danish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erika Palmer
spellingShingle Erika Palmer
Beyond proximity: Consequentialist Ethics and System Dynamics
Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
System dynamics
consequentialism
philosophy of engineering
modeling ethics
author_facet Erika Palmer
author_sort Erika Palmer
title Beyond proximity: Consequentialist Ethics and System Dynamics
title_short Beyond proximity: Consequentialist Ethics and System Dynamics
title_full Beyond proximity: Consequentialist Ethics and System Dynamics
title_fullStr Beyond proximity: Consequentialist Ethics and System Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Beyond proximity: Consequentialist Ethics and System Dynamics
title_sort beyond proximity: consequentialist ethics and system dynamics
publisher Norwegian University of Science and Technology Library
series Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
issn 1890-3991
1890-4009
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Consequentialism is a moral philosophy that maintains that the moral worth of an action is determined by the consequences it has for the welfare of a society. Consequences of model design are a part of the model lifecycle that is often neglected. This paper investigates the issue using system dynamics modeling as an example. Since a system dynamics model is a product of the modeler’s design decisions, the modeler should consider the life cycle consequences of using the model. Seen from a consequentialist perspective, the consequences of policies developed from system dynamics models determine the model’s moral value (ethical/unethical). This concept is explored by discussing model uncertainty from an engineering perspective. In this perspective, the ethical considerations shift from the behavior of the modeler (and away from validation) to the model itself and the model’s inherent uncertainty. When the ethical considerations are taken away from the modeler and directed to what the model does, the ethical boundaries extend beyond the proximity of the model. This discussion renews the ethics conversation in system dynamics by considering this shift in philosophical perspective, and investigates how consequentialist moral philosophy applies to the modeling process and in communicating with decision-makers. A model of social assistance in Norway in the context of immigration pressures illustrates some possibilities for addressing these ethical concerns. This paper argues for an ethical framework, or at the very least, an ethical conversation within the field of system dynamics. Article first published online: 25 FEB 2017
topic System dynamics
consequentialism
philosophy of engineering
modeling ethics
url https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/1978
work_keys_str_mv AT erikapalmer beyondproximityconsequentialistethicsandsystemdynamics
_version_ 1724761627588296704