3D printing in neurosurgery education: a review

Abstract Objectives The objectives of this manuscript were to review the literature concerning 3D printing of brain and cranial vault pathology and use these data to define the gaps in global utilization of 3D printing technology for neurosurgical education. Methods Using specified criteria, literat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grace M. Thiong’o, Mark Bernstein, James M. Drake
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:3D Printing in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00099-4
id doaj-4532b70ae71446f5863016d190efc0f7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4532b70ae71446f5863016d190efc0f72021-03-28T11:21:13ZengBMC3D Printing in Medicine2365-62712021-03-01711610.1186/s41205-021-00099-43D printing in neurosurgery education: a reviewGrace M. Thiong’o0Mark Bernstein1James M. Drake2Center for Image Guided Innovation and Therapeutic InterventionDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of TorontoCenter for Image Guided Innovation and Therapeutic InterventionAbstract Objectives The objectives of this manuscript were to review the literature concerning 3D printing of brain and cranial vault pathology and use these data to define the gaps in global utilization of 3D printing technology for neurosurgical education. Methods Using specified criteria, literature searching was conducted to identify publications describing engineered neurosurgical simulators. Included in the study were manuscripts highlighting designs validated for neurosurgical skill transfer. Purely anatomical designs, lacking aspects of surgical simulation, were excluded. Eligible manuscripts were analyzed. Data on the types of simulators, representing the various modelled neurosurgical pathologies, were recorded. Authors’ countries of affiliation were also recorded. Results A total of thirty-six articles, representing ten countries in five continents were identified. Geographically, Africa as a continent was not represented in any of the publications. The simulation-modelling encompassed a variety of neurosurgical subspecialties including: vascular, skull base, ventriculoscopy / ventriculostomy, craniosynostosis, skull lesions / skull defects, intrinsic brain tumor and other. Finally, the vascular and skull base categories together accounted for over half (52.8 %) of the 3D printed simulated neurosurgical pathology. Conclusions Despite the growing body of literature supporting 3D printing in neurosurgical education, its full potential has not been maximized. Unexplored areas of 3D printing for neurosurgical simulation include models simulating the resection of intrinsic brain tumors or of epilepsy surgery lesions, as these require complex models to accurately simulate fine dissection techniques. 3D printed surgical phantoms offer an avenue for the advancement of global-surgery education initiatives.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00099-4Additive ManufacturingNeurosurgery EducationRapid prototyping3D printing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Grace M. Thiong’o
Mark Bernstein
James M. Drake
spellingShingle Grace M. Thiong’o
Mark Bernstein
James M. Drake
3D printing in neurosurgery education: a review
3D Printing in Medicine
Additive Manufacturing
Neurosurgery Education
Rapid prototyping
3D printing
author_facet Grace M. Thiong’o
Mark Bernstein
James M. Drake
author_sort Grace M. Thiong’o
title 3D printing in neurosurgery education: a review
title_short 3D printing in neurosurgery education: a review
title_full 3D printing in neurosurgery education: a review
title_fullStr 3D printing in neurosurgery education: a review
title_full_unstemmed 3D printing in neurosurgery education: a review
title_sort 3d printing in neurosurgery education: a review
publisher BMC
series 3D Printing in Medicine
issn 2365-6271
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Objectives The objectives of this manuscript were to review the literature concerning 3D printing of brain and cranial vault pathology and use these data to define the gaps in global utilization of 3D printing technology for neurosurgical education. Methods Using specified criteria, literature searching was conducted to identify publications describing engineered neurosurgical simulators. Included in the study were manuscripts highlighting designs validated for neurosurgical skill transfer. Purely anatomical designs, lacking aspects of surgical simulation, were excluded. Eligible manuscripts were analyzed. Data on the types of simulators, representing the various modelled neurosurgical pathologies, were recorded. Authors’ countries of affiliation were also recorded. Results A total of thirty-six articles, representing ten countries in five continents were identified. Geographically, Africa as a continent was not represented in any of the publications. The simulation-modelling encompassed a variety of neurosurgical subspecialties including: vascular, skull base, ventriculoscopy / ventriculostomy, craniosynostosis, skull lesions / skull defects, intrinsic brain tumor and other. Finally, the vascular and skull base categories together accounted for over half (52.8 %) of the 3D printed simulated neurosurgical pathology. Conclusions Despite the growing body of literature supporting 3D printing in neurosurgical education, its full potential has not been maximized. Unexplored areas of 3D printing for neurosurgical simulation include models simulating the resection of intrinsic brain tumors or of epilepsy surgery lesions, as these require complex models to accurately simulate fine dissection techniques. 3D printed surgical phantoms offer an avenue for the advancement of global-surgery education initiatives.
topic Additive Manufacturing
Neurosurgery Education
Rapid prototyping
3D printing
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00099-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gracemthiongo 3dprintinginneurosurgeryeducationareview
AT markbernstein 3dprintinginneurosurgeryeducationareview
AT jamesmdrake 3dprintinginneurosurgeryeducationareview
_version_ 1724200104984838144