Olivocochlear Efferent Function: Issues regarding methods and the interpretation of results

As studies of the olivocochlear (OC) efferent system have matured, issues have been identified that need to be taken into account in the design of new studies and in the interpretation of existing work. The need for high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), multiple alternations of conditions, and avoidin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John J. Guinan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Subjects:
MOC
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00142/full
id doaj-4535e42aea8e400591083668f6d5c722
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4535e42aea8e400591083668f6d5c7222020-11-24T22:49:08ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience1662-51372014-08-01810.3389/fnsys.2014.00142104977Olivocochlear Efferent Function: Issues regarding methods and the interpretation of resultsJohn J. Guinan0Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary; and Harvard Medical SchoolAs studies of the olivocochlear (OC) efferent system have matured, issues have been identified that need to be taken into account in the design of new studies and in the interpretation of existing work. The need for high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), multiple alternations of conditions, and avoiding middle-ear-muscle activation have been previously highlighted. Less well-known issues include: Contralateral medial OC (MOC) effects may not be good proxies for ipsilateral MOC effects; MOC-induced changes in otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) may not accurately show MOC-induced changes in auditory-nerve responses; Measuring OAE differences from before to after psychophysical trials yields the transient OAE change but not tonic MOC activation; Tonic MOC activation may be measurable by several techniques including by OAE differences in trials in which the subject’s judgment was correct versus trials that were incorrect; SNRs can be preserved by Bootstrap statistical tests; Differences in task difficulty may outweigh differences in subject attention; Lateral efferent effects are little understood and may be tied to MOC effects; To assess whether MOC strength predicts protection from acoustic trauma, prospective tests in humans are needed.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00142/fullAttentiontask difficultyauditory psychophysicsMOColivocochlear efferentsmedial olivocochlear
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John J. Guinan
spellingShingle John J. Guinan
Olivocochlear Efferent Function: Issues regarding methods and the interpretation of results
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Attention
task difficulty
auditory psychophysics
MOC
olivocochlear efferents
medial olivocochlear
author_facet John J. Guinan
author_sort John J. Guinan
title Olivocochlear Efferent Function: Issues regarding methods and the interpretation of results
title_short Olivocochlear Efferent Function: Issues regarding methods and the interpretation of results
title_full Olivocochlear Efferent Function: Issues regarding methods and the interpretation of results
title_fullStr Olivocochlear Efferent Function: Issues regarding methods and the interpretation of results
title_full_unstemmed Olivocochlear Efferent Function: Issues regarding methods and the interpretation of results
title_sort olivocochlear efferent function: issues regarding methods and the interpretation of results
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
issn 1662-5137
publishDate 2014-08-01
description As studies of the olivocochlear (OC) efferent system have matured, issues have been identified that need to be taken into account in the design of new studies and in the interpretation of existing work. The need for high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), multiple alternations of conditions, and avoiding middle-ear-muscle activation have been previously highlighted. Less well-known issues include: Contralateral medial OC (MOC) effects may not be good proxies for ipsilateral MOC effects; MOC-induced changes in otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) may not accurately show MOC-induced changes in auditory-nerve responses; Measuring OAE differences from before to after psychophysical trials yields the transient OAE change but not tonic MOC activation; Tonic MOC activation may be measurable by several techniques including by OAE differences in trials in which the subject’s judgment was correct versus trials that were incorrect; SNRs can be preserved by Bootstrap statistical tests; Differences in task difficulty may outweigh differences in subject attention; Lateral efferent effects are little understood and may be tied to MOC effects; To assess whether MOC strength predicts protection from acoustic trauma, prospective tests in humans are needed.
topic Attention
task difficulty
auditory psychophysics
MOC
olivocochlear efferents
medial olivocochlear
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00142/full
work_keys_str_mv AT johnjguinan olivocochlearefferentfunctionissuesregardingmethodsandtheinterpretationofresults
_version_ 1725677138665799680