Climate science curricula in Canadian secondary schools focus on human warming, not scientific consensus, impacts or solutions.

Despite an overwhelming scientific consensus that climate change poses severe risks to human and natural systems, many young Canadian adults do not view it as a major issue. We analyzed secondary science curricula in each province for their coverage of climate change according to six core topics: ph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seth Wynes, Kimberly A Nicholas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218305
id doaj-4545a890992f4f5096364d44c1e08100
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4545a890992f4f5096364d44c1e081002021-03-03T20:34:11ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01147e021830510.1371/journal.pone.0218305Climate science curricula in Canadian secondary schools focus on human warming, not scientific consensus, impacts or solutions.Seth WynesKimberly A NicholasDespite an overwhelming scientific consensus that climate change poses severe risks to human and natural systems, many young Canadian adults do not view it as a major issue. We analyzed secondary science curricula in each province for their coverage of climate change according to six core topics: physical climate mechanisms ("It's climate"), observed increase in temperature ("It's warming"), anthropogenic causes of warming ("It's us"), scientific consensus ("Experts agree"), negative consequences associated with warming ("It's bad"), and the possibility for avoiding the worst effects ("We can fix it"). We found that learning objectives tend to focus on knowledge of the first three elements, with little or no emphasis on scientific consensus, climate change impacts, or ways to address the issue. The provinces of Saskatchewan and Ontario provide the most comprehensive standards for climate change education, while Nova Scotia and New Brunswick provide the least. We conducted interviews with individuals responsible for curriculum design in six different provinces to understand how curriculum documents are developed and whether political controversies influence the writing process. Interviewees described a process relying on input from professionals, institutions, and members of the public where curriculum developers made decisions independent of political concerns. In some cases, efforts to provide balance may have led to a focus on social controversy, contrary to overwhelming scientific consensus. Curriculum documents are the basis for teacher instruction and textbook content; aligning these documents with the best possible evidence can improve student learning and engage the next generation of Canadians on the critical issue of climate change.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218305
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Seth Wynes
Kimberly A Nicholas
spellingShingle Seth Wynes
Kimberly A Nicholas
Climate science curricula in Canadian secondary schools focus on human warming, not scientific consensus, impacts or solutions.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Seth Wynes
Kimberly A Nicholas
author_sort Seth Wynes
title Climate science curricula in Canadian secondary schools focus on human warming, not scientific consensus, impacts or solutions.
title_short Climate science curricula in Canadian secondary schools focus on human warming, not scientific consensus, impacts or solutions.
title_full Climate science curricula in Canadian secondary schools focus on human warming, not scientific consensus, impacts or solutions.
title_fullStr Climate science curricula in Canadian secondary schools focus on human warming, not scientific consensus, impacts or solutions.
title_full_unstemmed Climate science curricula in Canadian secondary schools focus on human warming, not scientific consensus, impacts or solutions.
title_sort climate science curricula in canadian secondary schools focus on human warming, not scientific consensus, impacts or solutions.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Despite an overwhelming scientific consensus that climate change poses severe risks to human and natural systems, many young Canadian adults do not view it as a major issue. We analyzed secondary science curricula in each province for their coverage of climate change according to six core topics: physical climate mechanisms ("It's climate"), observed increase in temperature ("It's warming"), anthropogenic causes of warming ("It's us"), scientific consensus ("Experts agree"), negative consequences associated with warming ("It's bad"), and the possibility for avoiding the worst effects ("We can fix it"). We found that learning objectives tend to focus on knowledge of the first three elements, with little or no emphasis on scientific consensus, climate change impacts, or ways to address the issue. The provinces of Saskatchewan and Ontario provide the most comprehensive standards for climate change education, while Nova Scotia and New Brunswick provide the least. We conducted interviews with individuals responsible for curriculum design in six different provinces to understand how curriculum documents are developed and whether political controversies influence the writing process. Interviewees described a process relying on input from professionals, institutions, and members of the public where curriculum developers made decisions independent of political concerns. In some cases, efforts to provide balance may have led to a focus on social controversy, contrary to overwhelming scientific consensus. Curriculum documents are the basis for teacher instruction and textbook content; aligning these documents with the best possible evidence can improve student learning and engage the next generation of Canadians on the critical issue of climate change.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218305
work_keys_str_mv AT sethwynes climatesciencecurriculaincanadiansecondaryschoolsfocusonhumanwarmingnotscientificconsensusimpactsorsolutions
AT kimberlyanicholas climatesciencecurriculaincanadiansecondaryschoolsfocusonhumanwarmingnotscientificconsensusimpactsorsolutions
_version_ 1714821752880627712