The role of adhesion molecules as biomarkers for the aggressive prostate cancer phenotype.

BACKGROUND: Currently available methods for diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer lack the sensitivity to distinguish between patients with indolent prostate cancer and those requiring radical treatment. Alterations in key adherens (AJ) and tight junction (TJ) components have been hailed as poten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claire Morgan, Spencer A Jenkins, Howard G Kynaston, Shareen H Doak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3864842?pdf=render
id doaj-457a4e902c1647e49de21c4434d900fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-457a4e902c1647e49de21c4434d900fa2020-11-25T01:20:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8166610.1371/journal.pone.0081666The role of adhesion molecules as biomarkers for the aggressive prostate cancer phenotype.Claire MorganSpencer A JenkinsHoward G KynastonShareen H DoakBACKGROUND: Currently available methods for diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer lack the sensitivity to distinguish between patients with indolent prostate cancer and those requiring radical treatment. Alterations in key adherens (AJ) and tight junction (TJ) components have been hailed as potential biomarkers for prostate cancer progression but the majority of research has been carried out on individual molecules. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate a panel of biomarkers that may help distinguish dormant prostate cancer from aggressive metastatic disease. METHODS: We analysed the expression of 7 well known AJ and TJ components in cell lines derived from normal prostate epithelial tissue (PNT2), non-invasive (CAHPV-10) and invasive prostate cancer (LNCaP, DU145, PC-3) using gene expression, western blotting and immunofluorescence techniques. RESULTS: Claudin 7, α -catenin and β-catenin protein expression were not significantly different between CAHPV-10 cells and PNT2 cells. However, in PC-3 cells, protein levels for claudin 7, α -catenin were significantly down regulated (-1.5 fold, p = <.001) or undetectable respectively. Immunofluoresence showed β-catenin localisation in PC-3 cells to be cytoplasmic as opposed to membraneous. CONCLUSION: These results suggest aberrant Claudin 7, α - and β-catenin expression and/or localisation patterns may be putative markers for distinguishing localised prostate cancer from aggressive metastatic disease when used collectively.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3864842?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Claire Morgan
Spencer A Jenkins
Howard G Kynaston
Shareen H Doak
spellingShingle Claire Morgan
Spencer A Jenkins
Howard G Kynaston
Shareen H Doak
The role of adhesion molecules as biomarkers for the aggressive prostate cancer phenotype.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Claire Morgan
Spencer A Jenkins
Howard G Kynaston
Shareen H Doak
author_sort Claire Morgan
title The role of adhesion molecules as biomarkers for the aggressive prostate cancer phenotype.
title_short The role of adhesion molecules as biomarkers for the aggressive prostate cancer phenotype.
title_full The role of adhesion molecules as biomarkers for the aggressive prostate cancer phenotype.
title_fullStr The role of adhesion molecules as biomarkers for the aggressive prostate cancer phenotype.
title_full_unstemmed The role of adhesion molecules as biomarkers for the aggressive prostate cancer phenotype.
title_sort role of adhesion molecules as biomarkers for the aggressive prostate cancer phenotype.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description BACKGROUND: Currently available methods for diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer lack the sensitivity to distinguish between patients with indolent prostate cancer and those requiring radical treatment. Alterations in key adherens (AJ) and tight junction (TJ) components have been hailed as potential biomarkers for prostate cancer progression but the majority of research has been carried out on individual molecules. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate a panel of biomarkers that may help distinguish dormant prostate cancer from aggressive metastatic disease. METHODS: We analysed the expression of 7 well known AJ and TJ components in cell lines derived from normal prostate epithelial tissue (PNT2), non-invasive (CAHPV-10) and invasive prostate cancer (LNCaP, DU145, PC-3) using gene expression, western blotting and immunofluorescence techniques. RESULTS: Claudin 7, α -catenin and β-catenin protein expression were not significantly different between CAHPV-10 cells and PNT2 cells. However, in PC-3 cells, protein levels for claudin 7, α -catenin were significantly down regulated (-1.5 fold, p = <.001) or undetectable respectively. Immunofluoresence showed β-catenin localisation in PC-3 cells to be cytoplasmic as opposed to membraneous. CONCLUSION: These results suggest aberrant Claudin 7, α - and β-catenin expression and/or localisation patterns may be putative markers for distinguishing localised prostate cancer from aggressive metastatic disease when used collectively.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3864842?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT clairemorgan theroleofadhesionmoleculesasbiomarkersfortheaggressiveprostatecancerphenotype
AT spencerajenkins theroleofadhesionmoleculesasbiomarkersfortheaggressiveprostatecancerphenotype
AT howardgkynaston theroleofadhesionmoleculesasbiomarkersfortheaggressiveprostatecancerphenotype
AT shareenhdoak theroleofadhesionmoleculesasbiomarkersfortheaggressiveprostatecancerphenotype
AT clairemorgan roleofadhesionmoleculesasbiomarkersfortheaggressiveprostatecancerphenotype
AT spencerajenkins roleofadhesionmoleculesasbiomarkersfortheaggressiveprostatecancerphenotype
AT howardgkynaston roleofadhesionmoleculesasbiomarkersfortheaggressiveprostatecancerphenotype
AT shareenhdoak roleofadhesionmoleculesasbiomarkersfortheaggressiveprostatecancerphenotype
_version_ 1725131851176083456