A quantitative metric for the comparative evaluation of optical clearing protocols for 3D multicellular spheroids

3D multicellular spheroids quickly emerged as in vitro models because they represent the in vivo tumor environment better than standard 2D cell cultures. However, with current microscopy technologies, it is difficult to visualize individual cells in the deeper layers of 3D samples mainly because of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akos Diosdi, Dominik Hirling, Maria Kovacs, Timea Toth, Maria Harmati, Krisztian Koos, Krisztina Buzas, Filippo Piccinini, Peter Horvath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000441
id doaj-4594fabdb03e41c1b1081bda60ba2fac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4594fabdb03e41c1b1081bda60ba2fac2021-02-25T04:17:41ZengElsevierComputational and Structural Biotechnology Journal2001-03702021-01-011912331243A quantitative metric for the comparative evaluation of optical clearing protocols for 3D multicellular spheroidsAkos Diosdi0Dominik Hirling1Maria Kovacs2Timea Toth3Maria Harmati4Krisztian Koos5Krisztina Buzas6Filippo Piccinini7Peter Horvath8Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), H-6726 Szeged, Hungary; Doctoral School of Biology, University of Szeged, H-6726 Szeged, HungarySynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), H-6726 Szeged, Hungary; Doctoral School of Computer Science, University of Szeged, H-6701 Szeged, HungarySynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), H-6726 Szeged, HungarySynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), H-6726 Szeged, Hungary; Doctoral School of Biology, University of Szeged, H-6726 Szeged, HungarySynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), H-6726 Szeged, HungarySynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), H-6726 Szeged, HungarySynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), H-6726 Szeged, Hungary; Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, HungaryIRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Via Piero Maroncelli 40, I-47014 Meldola, FC, ItalySynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), H-6726 Szeged, Hungary; Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland; Single-Cell Technologies Ltd., H-6726 Szeged, Hungary; Corresponding author at: Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.3D multicellular spheroids quickly emerged as in vitro models because they represent the in vivo tumor environment better than standard 2D cell cultures. However, with current microscopy technologies, it is difficult to visualize individual cells in the deeper layers of 3D samples mainly because of limited light penetration and scattering. To overcome this problem several optical clearing methods have been proposed but defining the most appropriate clearing approach is an open issue due to the lack of a gold standard metric. Here, we propose a guideline for 3D light microscopy imaging to achieve single-cell resolution. The guideline includes a validation experiment focusing on five optical clearing protocols. We review and compare seven quality metrics which quantitatively characterize the imaging quality of spheroids. As a test environment, we have created and shared a large 3D dataset including approximately hundred fluorescently stained and optically cleared spheroids. Based on the results we introduce the use of a novel quality metric as a promising method to serve as a gold standard, applicable to compare optical clearing protocols, and decide on the most suitable one for a particular experiment.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000441Optical tissue clearingSpheroidLight-sheet microscopyFocus metrics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Akos Diosdi
Dominik Hirling
Maria Kovacs
Timea Toth
Maria Harmati
Krisztian Koos
Krisztina Buzas
Filippo Piccinini
Peter Horvath
spellingShingle Akos Diosdi
Dominik Hirling
Maria Kovacs
Timea Toth
Maria Harmati
Krisztian Koos
Krisztina Buzas
Filippo Piccinini
Peter Horvath
A quantitative metric for the comparative evaluation of optical clearing protocols for 3D multicellular spheroids
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Optical tissue clearing
Spheroid
Light-sheet microscopy
Focus metrics
author_facet Akos Diosdi
Dominik Hirling
Maria Kovacs
Timea Toth
Maria Harmati
Krisztian Koos
Krisztina Buzas
Filippo Piccinini
Peter Horvath
author_sort Akos Diosdi
title A quantitative metric for the comparative evaluation of optical clearing protocols for 3D multicellular spheroids
title_short A quantitative metric for the comparative evaluation of optical clearing protocols for 3D multicellular spheroids
title_full A quantitative metric for the comparative evaluation of optical clearing protocols for 3D multicellular spheroids
title_fullStr A quantitative metric for the comparative evaluation of optical clearing protocols for 3D multicellular spheroids
title_full_unstemmed A quantitative metric for the comparative evaluation of optical clearing protocols for 3D multicellular spheroids
title_sort quantitative metric for the comparative evaluation of optical clearing protocols for 3d multicellular spheroids
publisher Elsevier
series Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
issn 2001-0370
publishDate 2021-01-01
description 3D multicellular spheroids quickly emerged as in vitro models because they represent the in vivo tumor environment better than standard 2D cell cultures. However, with current microscopy technologies, it is difficult to visualize individual cells in the deeper layers of 3D samples mainly because of limited light penetration and scattering. To overcome this problem several optical clearing methods have been proposed but defining the most appropriate clearing approach is an open issue due to the lack of a gold standard metric. Here, we propose a guideline for 3D light microscopy imaging to achieve single-cell resolution. The guideline includes a validation experiment focusing on five optical clearing protocols. We review and compare seven quality metrics which quantitatively characterize the imaging quality of spheroids. As a test environment, we have created and shared a large 3D dataset including approximately hundred fluorescently stained and optically cleared spheroids. Based on the results we introduce the use of a novel quality metric as a promising method to serve as a gold standard, applicable to compare optical clearing protocols, and decide on the most suitable one for a particular experiment.
topic Optical tissue clearing
Spheroid
Light-sheet microscopy
Focus metrics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021000441
work_keys_str_mv AT akosdiosdi aquantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT dominikhirling aquantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT mariakovacs aquantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT timeatoth aquantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT mariaharmati aquantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT krisztiankoos aquantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT krisztinabuzas aquantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT filippopiccinini aquantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT peterhorvath aquantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT akosdiosdi quantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT dominikhirling quantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT mariakovacs quantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT timeatoth quantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT mariaharmati quantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT krisztiankoos quantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT krisztinabuzas quantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT filippopiccinini quantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
AT peterhorvath quantitativemetricforthecomparativeevaluationofopticalclearingprotocolsfor3dmulticellularspheroids
_version_ 1724252174244904960