Development of visual systems for faces and objects: further evidence for prolonged development of the face system.

BACKGROUND:The development of face and object processing has attracted much attention; however, studies that directly compare processing of both visual categories across age are rare. In the present study, we compared the developmental trajectories of face and object processing in younger children (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bozana Meinhardt-Injac, Malte Persike, Günter Meinhardt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4067275?pdf=render
id doaj-459a9336f419413fa5b6105c5b2f7ced
record_format Article
spelling doaj-459a9336f419413fa5b6105c5b2f7ced2020-11-24T21:45:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0196e9994210.1371/journal.pone.0099942Development of visual systems for faces and objects: further evidence for prolonged development of the face system.Bozana Meinhardt-InjacMalte PersikeGünter MeinhardtBACKGROUND:The development of face and object processing has attracted much attention; however, studies that directly compare processing of both visual categories across age are rare. In the present study, we compared the developmental trajectories of face and object processing in younger children (8-10 years), older children (11-13 years), adolescents (14-16 years), and adults (20-37). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:We used a congruency paradigm in which subjects compared the internal features of two stimuli, while the (unattended) external features either agreed or disagreed independent of the identity of the internal features. We found a continuous increase in matching accuracy for faces and watches across childhood and adolescence, with different magnitudes for both visual categories. In watch perception, adult levels were reached at the age of 14-16, but not in face perception. The effect of context and inversion, as measures of holistic and configural processing, were clearly restricted to faces in all age groups. This finding suggests that different mechanisms are involved in face and object perception at any age tested. Moreover, the modulation of context and inversion effects by exposure duration was strongly age-dependent, with the strongest age-related differences found for brief timings below 140 ms. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:The results of the present study suggest prolonged development of face-specific processing up to young adulthood. The improvement in face processing is qualitatively different from the improvement of general perceptual and cognitive ability.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4067275?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bozana Meinhardt-Injac
Malte Persike
Günter Meinhardt
spellingShingle Bozana Meinhardt-Injac
Malte Persike
Günter Meinhardt
Development of visual systems for faces and objects: further evidence for prolonged development of the face system.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Bozana Meinhardt-Injac
Malte Persike
Günter Meinhardt
author_sort Bozana Meinhardt-Injac
title Development of visual systems for faces and objects: further evidence for prolonged development of the face system.
title_short Development of visual systems for faces and objects: further evidence for prolonged development of the face system.
title_full Development of visual systems for faces and objects: further evidence for prolonged development of the face system.
title_fullStr Development of visual systems for faces and objects: further evidence for prolonged development of the face system.
title_full_unstemmed Development of visual systems for faces and objects: further evidence for prolonged development of the face system.
title_sort development of visual systems for faces and objects: further evidence for prolonged development of the face system.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description BACKGROUND:The development of face and object processing has attracted much attention; however, studies that directly compare processing of both visual categories across age are rare. In the present study, we compared the developmental trajectories of face and object processing in younger children (8-10 years), older children (11-13 years), adolescents (14-16 years), and adults (20-37). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:We used a congruency paradigm in which subjects compared the internal features of two stimuli, while the (unattended) external features either agreed or disagreed independent of the identity of the internal features. We found a continuous increase in matching accuracy for faces and watches across childhood and adolescence, with different magnitudes for both visual categories. In watch perception, adult levels were reached at the age of 14-16, but not in face perception. The effect of context and inversion, as measures of holistic and configural processing, were clearly restricted to faces in all age groups. This finding suggests that different mechanisms are involved in face and object perception at any age tested. Moreover, the modulation of context and inversion effects by exposure duration was strongly age-dependent, with the strongest age-related differences found for brief timings below 140 ms. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:The results of the present study suggest prolonged development of face-specific processing up to young adulthood. The improvement in face processing is qualitatively different from the improvement of general perceptual and cognitive ability.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4067275?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT bozanameinhardtinjac developmentofvisualsystemsforfacesandobjectsfurtherevidenceforprolongeddevelopmentofthefacesystem
AT maltepersike developmentofvisualsystemsforfacesandobjectsfurtherevidenceforprolongeddevelopmentofthefacesystem
AT guntermeinhardt developmentofvisualsystemsforfacesandobjectsfurtherevidenceforprolongeddevelopmentofthefacesystem
_version_ 1725904615424131072