Alcohol-assisted versus Mechanical Epithelium Removal in Photorefractive Keratectomy

Purpose: To compare the outcomes and complications of alcohol-assisted versus mechanical corneal epithelial debridement for photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 1,250 eyes of 625 patients undergoing PRK for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Ghoreishi, Hossein Attarzadeh, Mehdi Tavakoli, Heidar Ali Moini, Alireza Zandi, Amin Masjedi, Akram Rismanchian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Knowledge E 2010-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2010;volume=5;issue=4;spage=223;epage=227;aulast=Ghoreishi,
id doaj-459f4fc0721b4519b1ab2568328f9b33
record_format Article
spelling doaj-459f4fc0721b4519b1ab2568328f9b332020-11-25T02:00:14ZengKnowledge EJournal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research2008-322X2010-01-0154223227Alcohol-assisted versus Mechanical Epithelium Removal in Photorefractive KeratectomyMohammad Ghoreishi,Hossein AttarzadehMehdi TavakoliHeidar Ali MoiniAlireza ZandiAmin MasjediAkram RismanchianPurpose: To compare the outcomes and complications of alcohol-assisted versus mechanical corneal epithelial debridement for photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 1,250 eyes of 625 patients undergoing PRK for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Each patient was randomly assigned to alcohol-assisted or mechanical epithelial removal. Results: A total of 658 eyes underwent alcohol-assisted epithelial removal while the epithelium was removed mechanically in 592 eyes. Mean spherical equivalent was ‑4.37}2.3 D in the alcohol group and ‑3.8}1.3 D in the mechanical group (P = 0.78). There was no significant difference in postoperative pain between the study groups (P = 0.22). Uncorrected visual acuity ≥ 20/20 and ≥ 20/40 was achieved in 90.9% versus 93.4% (P = 0.08), and 98.9% versus 99.5% (P = 0.36) of eyes in the alcohol and mechanical groups, respectively. Final refractive error within 1D of emmetropia was achieved in 90% versus 92.2% of eyes in the alcohol and mechanical groups, respectively (P = 0.23). Alcohol-assisted debridement required less time than mechanical debridement (96±18 vs. 118±26 seconds, P=0.035). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of early and late postoperative complications. Conclusion: Alcohol-assisted and mechanical epithelium removal are comparable in terms of efficacy and side effects. The method of epithelial debridement in PRK may be left to the surgeon′s choice.http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2010;volume=5;issue=4;spage=223;epage=227;aulast=Ghoreishi,Photorefractive Keratectomy; LasersExcimer; Epithelial Debridement; Ethanol
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Ghoreishi,
Hossein Attarzadeh
Mehdi Tavakoli
Heidar Ali Moini
Alireza Zandi
Amin Masjedi
Akram Rismanchian
spellingShingle Mohammad Ghoreishi,
Hossein Attarzadeh
Mehdi Tavakoli
Heidar Ali Moini
Alireza Zandi
Amin Masjedi
Akram Rismanchian
Alcohol-assisted versus Mechanical Epithelium Removal in Photorefractive Keratectomy
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
Photorefractive Keratectomy; Lasers
Excimer; Epithelial Debridement; Ethanol
author_facet Mohammad Ghoreishi,
Hossein Attarzadeh
Mehdi Tavakoli
Heidar Ali Moini
Alireza Zandi
Amin Masjedi
Akram Rismanchian
author_sort Mohammad Ghoreishi,
title Alcohol-assisted versus Mechanical Epithelium Removal in Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_short Alcohol-assisted versus Mechanical Epithelium Removal in Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_full Alcohol-assisted versus Mechanical Epithelium Removal in Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_fullStr Alcohol-assisted versus Mechanical Epithelium Removal in Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_full_unstemmed Alcohol-assisted versus Mechanical Epithelium Removal in Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_sort alcohol-assisted versus mechanical epithelium removal in photorefractive keratectomy
publisher Knowledge E
series Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
issn 2008-322X
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Purpose: To compare the outcomes and complications of alcohol-assisted versus mechanical corneal epithelial debridement for photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 1,250 eyes of 625 patients undergoing PRK for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Each patient was randomly assigned to alcohol-assisted or mechanical epithelial removal. Results: A total of 658 eyes underwent alcohol-assisted epithelial removal while the epithelium was removed mechanically in 592 eyes. Mean spherical equivalent was ‑4.37}2.3 D in the alcohol group and ‑3.8}1.3 D in the mechanical group (P = 0.78). There was no significant difference in postoperative pain between the study groups (P = 0.22). Uncorrected visual acuity ≥ 20/20 and ≥ 20/40 was achieved in 90.9% versus 93.4% (P = 0.08), and 98.9% versus 99.5% (P = 0.36) of eyes in the alcohol and mechanical groups, respectively. Final refractive error within 1D of emmetropia was achieved in 90% versus 92.2% of eyes in the alcohol and mechanical groups, respectively (P = 0.23). Alcohol-assisted debridement required less time than mechanical debridement (96±18 vs. 118±26 seconds, P=0.035). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of early and late postoperative complications. Conclusion: Alcohol-assisted and mechanical epithelium removal are comparable in terms of efficacy and side effects. The method of epithelial debridement in PRK may be left to the surgeon′s choice.
topic Photorefractive Keratectomy; Lasers
Excimer; Epithelial Debridement; Ethanol
url http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2010;volume=5;issue=4;spage=223;epage=227;aulast=Ghoreishi,
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadghoreishi alcoholassistedversusmechanicalepitheliumremovalinphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT hosseinattarzadeh alcoholassistedversusmechanicalepitheliumremovalinphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT mehditavakoli alcoholassistedversusmechanicalepitheliumremovalinphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT heidaralimoini alcoholassistedversusmechanicalepitheliumremovalinphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT alirezazandi alcoholassistedversusmechanicalepitheliumremovalinphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT aminmasjedi alcoholassistedversusmechanicalepitheliumremovalinphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT akramrismanchian alcoholassistedversusmechanicalepitheliumremovalinphotorefractivekeratectomy
_version_ 1724961978600914944