Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements

Since the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament wields the power of consent over international (trade) agreements, enabling it to threaten a veto. Due to the extensive financial and reputational costs associated with a veto, the European Commission (hereinafter Commission) was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie Peffenköver, Johan Adriaensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2021-07-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4014
id doaj-45ad12641b50477aac8fa4a6599422c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-45ad12641b50477aac8fa4a6599422c82021-07-30T10:19:48ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632021-07-0193748410.17645/pag.v9i3.40142091Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade AgreementsMarie Peffenköver0Johan Adriaensen1Independent Researcher, BelgiumFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Maastricht University, The NetherlandsSince the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament wields the power of consent over international (trade) agreements, enabling it to threaten a veto. Due to the extensive financial and reputational costs associated with a veto, the European Commission (hereinafter Commission) was expected to read these threats effectively. However, the Commission’s responses to such threats have varied greatly. Building on a fine-grained causal mechanism derived from information processing theory and an extensive process-tracing analysis of seven free trade agreements post-Lisbon, we explain why the Commission has responded differently to looming vetoes. Our analysis reveals that the variation in Commission responses derives from imperfections in its information-processing system, the ‘early-warning system,’ which had to be adapted to the new institutional equilibrium post-Lisbon. Because of this adaption process, factors exogenous to the parliamentary context (‘externalities’) as well as internal uncertainties (‘internalities’) add constant unpredictability to the Commission’s reading of the European Parliament.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4014eu trade policyeuropean commissioneuropean parliamentinformation processing theorytrade agreementsveto
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marie Peffenköver
Johan Adriaensen
spellingShingle Marie Peffenköver
Johan Adriaensen
Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
Politics and Governance
eu trade policy
european commission
european parliament
information processing theory
trade agreements
veto
author_facet Marie Peffenköver
Johan Adriaensen
author_sort Marie Peffenköver
title Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
title_short Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
title_full Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
title_fullStr Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
title_full_unstemmed Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
title_sort detecting looming vetoes: getting the european parliament’s consent in trade agreements
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Since the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament wields the power of consent over international (trade) agreements, enabling it to threaten a veto. Due to the extensive financial and reputational costs associated with a veto, the European Commission (hereinafter Commission) was expected to read these threats effectively. However, the Commission’s responses to such threats have varied greatly. Building on a fine-grained causal mechanism derived from information processing theory and an extensive process-tracing analysis of seven free trade agreements post-Lisbon, we explain why the Commission has responded differently to looming vetoes. Our analysis reveals that the variation in Commission responses derives from imperfections in its information-processing system, the ‘early-warning system,’ which had to be adapted to the new institutional equilibrium post-Lisbon. Because of this adaption process, factors exogenous to the parliamentary context (‘externalities’) as well as internal uncertainties (‘internalities’) add constant unpredictability to the Commission’s reading of the European Parliament.
topic eu trade policy
european commission
european parliament
information processing theory
trade agreements
veto
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4014
work_keys_str_mv AT mariepeffenkover detectingloomingvetoesgettingtheeuropeanparliamentsconsentintradeagreements
AT johanadriaensen detectingloomingvetoesgettingtheeuropeanparliamentsconsentintradeagreements
_version_ 1721247641891766272