Comparison of mechanical properties of concrete and design thickness of pavement with different types of fiber-reinforcements (steel, glass, and polypropylene)
In this study, the effect of different fiber-reinforcements was investigated on the mechanical properties of normal strength and high strength concrete. Then using the mechanical properties of concrete, the design thickness of jointed plain concrete pavement was evaluated under the same traffic-load...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Case Studies in Construction Materials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509520301017 |
id |
doaj-45fd00f15b504cf4b98efb83c7451326 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-45fd00f15b504cf4b98efb83c74513262020-12-25T05:09:39ZengElsevierCase Studies in Construction Materials2214-50952020-12-0113e00429Comparison of mechanical properties of concrete and design thickness of pavement with different types of fiber-reinforcements (steel, glass, and polypropylene)Iqrar Hussain0Babar Ali1Tauqeer Akhtar2Muhammad Sohail Jameel3Syed Safdar Raza4Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, 47050, PakistanDepartment of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal Campus, 57000, Pakistan; Corresponding author.Department of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal Campus, 57000, PakistanDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, 47050, PakistanDepartment of Civil Engineering, Bahauddin Zakariya University, 66000, Multan, PakistanIn this study, the effect of different fiber-reinforcements was investigated on the mechanical properties of normal strength and high strength concrete. Then using the mechanical properties of concrete, the design thickness of jointed plain concrete pavement was evaluated under the same traffic-loading conditions. For this purpose, three different fiber-reinforced concretes were produced using a 1% volume fraction of hooked steel fiber, polypropylene fiber, and glass fiber, respectively. Studied mechanical properties include compressive strength, flexural strength, and residual strength. The results of mechanical testing show that steel fiber is superior in enhancing the compressive and flexural strength compared to glass and polypropylene fiber. The net gain in flexural strength and residual strength due to steel fiber is almost twice compared to that caused by polypropylene and glass fiber. 1%steel fiber incorporation reduced the design thickness of pavement from 183 to 120 mm for normal strength concrete and 155 to 105 mm for high strength concrete. Owing to the best flexural performance, steel fibers were the most effective in reducing the design thickness in comparison with polypropylene and glass fibers. But cost to benefit ratio analysis suggests that steel fiber-reinforced concretes are not economical compared to glass fiber and polypropylene fiber-reinforced concretes for the same load-carrying capacity. Therefore, for the same performance, glass and polypropylene fiber-reinforced concretes can provide cheaper pavements than steel fiber-reinforced concrete and conventional plain concrete.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509520301017Flexural strengthResidual flexural strengthThickness of concrete pavementSteelPolypropylene, and glass fibersCost analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Iqrar Hussain Babar Ali Tauqeer Akhtar Muhammad Sohail Jameel Syed Safdar Raza |
spellingShingle |
Iqrar Hussain Babar Ali Tauqeer Akhtar Muhammad Sohail Jameel Syed Safdar Raza Comparison of mechanical properties of concrete and design thickness of pavement with different types of fiber-reinforcements (steel, glass, and polypropylene) Case Studies in Construction Materials Flexural strength Residual flexural strength Thickness of concrete pavement Steel Polypropylene, and glass fibers Cost analysis |
author_facet |
Iqrar Hussain Babar Ali Tauqeer Akhtar Muhammad Sohail Jameel Syed Safdar Raza |
author_sort |
Iqrar Hussain |
title |
Comparison of mechanical properties of concrete and design thickness of pavement with different types of fiber-reinforcements (steel, glass, and polypropylene) |
title_short |
Comparison of mechanical properties of concrete and design thickness of pavement with different types of fiber-reinforcements (steel, glass, and polypropylene) |
title_full |
Comparison of mechanical properties of concrete and design thickness of pavement with different types of fiber-reinforcements (steel, glass, and polypropylene) |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of mechanical properties of concrete and design thickness of pavement with different types of fiber-reinforcements (steel, glass, and polypropylene) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of mechanical properties of concrete and design thickness of pavement with different types of fiber-reinforcements (steel, glass, and polypropylene) |
title_sort |
comparison of mechanical properties of concrete and design thickness of pavement with different types of fiber-reinforcements (steel, glass, and polypropylene) |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Case Studies in Construction Materials |
issn |
2214-5095 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
In this study, the effect of different fiber-reinforcements was investigated on the mechanical properties of normal strength and high strength concrete. Then using the mechanical properties of concrete, the design thickness of jointed plain concrete pavement was evaluated under the same traffic-loading conditions. For this purpose, three different fiber-reinforced concretes were produced using a 1% volume fraction of hooked steel fiber, polypropylene fiber, and glass fiber, respectively. Studied mechanical properties include compressive strength, flexural strength, and residual strength. The results of mechanical testing show that steel fiber is superior in enhancing the compressive and flexural strength compared to glass and polypropylene fiber. The net gain in flexural strength and residual strength due to steel fiber is almost twice compared to that caused by polypropylene and glass fiber. 1%steel fiber incorporation reduced the design thickness of pavement from 183 to 120 mm for normal strength concrete and 155 to 105 mm for high strength concrete. Owing to the best flexural performance, steel fibers were the most effective in reducing the design thickness in comparison with polypropylene and glass fibers. But cost to benefit ratio analysis suggests that steel fiber-reinforced concretes are not economical compared to glass fiber and polypropylene fiber-reinforced concretes for the same load-carrying capacity. Therefore, for the same performance, glass and polypropylene fiber-reinforced concretes can provide cheaper pavements than steel fiber-reinforced concrete and conventional plain concrete. |
topic |
Flexural strength Residual flexural strength Thickness of concrete pavement Steel Polypropylene, and glass fibers Cost analysis |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509520301017 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT iqrarhussain comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofconcreteanddesignthicknessofpavementwithdifferenttypesoffiberreinforcementssteelglassandpolypropylene AT babarali comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofconcreteanddesignthicknessofpavementwithdifferenttypesoffiberreinforcementssteelglassandpolypropylene AT tauqeerakhtar comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofconcreteanddesignthicknessofpavementwithdifferenttypesoffiberreinforcementssteelglassandpolypropylene AT muhammadsohailjameel comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofconcreteanddesignthicknessofpavementwithdifferenttypesoffiberreinforcementssteelglassandpolypropylene AT syedsafdarraza comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofconcreteanddesignthicknessofpavementwithdifferenttypesoffiberreinforcementssteelglassandpolypropylene |
_version_ |
1724371082920591360 |