Endoscopic myringoplasty: comparison of double layer cartilage-perichondrium graft and single fascia grafting

Abstract Objective To compare surgical results of endoscopic myringoplasty using double layer cartilage-perichondrium grafts versus single fascia grafts. Study design Prospective, randomized, controlled. Setting University-affiliated teaching hospital. Subjects and methods In total,134 patients who...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zheng cai Lou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-020-00440-7
id doaj-460d996ff6d64aacb5ebdb0e59406d29
record_format Article
spelling doaj-460d996ff6d64aacb5ebdb0e59406d292020-11-25T03:38:19ZengBMCJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery1916-02162020-06-014911910.1186/s40463-020-00440-7Endoscopic myringoplasty: comparison of double layer cartilage-perichondrium graft and single fascia graftingZheng cai Lou0Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the affiliated Yiwu hospital of Wenzhou medical university (Yiwu central Hospital)Abstract Objective To compare surgical results of endoscopic myringoplasty using double layer cartilage-perichondrium grafts versus single fascia grafts. Study design Prospective, randomized, controlled. Setting University-affiliated teaching hospital. Subjects and methods In total,134 patients who underwent endoscopic myringoplasty were included in this study. Patients in group A received a double layer tragal cartilage-perichondrium graft and those in group B received a temporal muscle fascia graft. The groups were compared with respect to the pre- and postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) and the graft success rate. Results The graft success rate was 98.5% (66/67) in the Group A and 94.0% (63/67) in the Group B at 6 months, the difference wasn’t statistically significant (p = 0.362). However, the graft success rate was 97.0% (65/67) in the Group A and 85.1% (57/67) in the Group B at 12 months, the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.034). In addition, only one patient (1.49%) had small keratin pearls in the Group A, no patients developed cholesteatoma of middle ear in either group. Conclusions The endoscopic double layer perichondrium-cartilage graft technique is feasible for repairing medium or larger perforations, it has a better long-term graft success rate and less operative time compared with the single layer fascia graft technique. However, long-term hearing outcomes were the same for the single and double layer closure techniques.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-020-00440-7EndoscopyMyringoplastyDouble layer graftCartilage-perichondriumFascia graft
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zheng cai Lou
spellingShingle Zheng cai Lou
Endoscopic myringoplasty: comparison of double layer cartilage-perichondrium graft and single fascia grafting
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Endoscopy
Myringoplasty
Double layer graft
Cartilage-perichondrium
Fascia graft
author_facet Zheng cai Lou
author_sort Zheng cai Lou
title Endoscopic myringoplasty: comparison of double layer cartilage-perichondrium graft and single fascia grafting
title_short Endoscopic myringoplasty: comparison of double layer cartilage-perichondrium graft and single fascia grafting
title_full Endoscopic myringoplasty: comparison of double layer cartilage-perichondrium graft and single fascia grafting
title_fullStr Endoscopic myringoplasty: comparison of double layer cartilage-perichondrium graft and single fascia grafting
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic myringoplasty: comparison of double layer cartilage-perichondrium graft and single fascia grafting
title_sort endoscopic myringoplasty: comparison of double layer cartilage-perichondrium graft and single fascia grafting
publisher BMC
series Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
issn 1916-0216
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Objective To compare surgical results of endoscopic myringoplasty using double layer cartilage-perichondrium grafts versus single fascia grafts. Study design Prospective, randomized, controlled. Setting University-affiliated teaching hospital. Subjects and methods In total,134 patients who underwent endoscopic myringoplasty were included in this study. Patients in group A received a double layer tragal cartilage-perichondrium graft and those in group B received a temporal muscle fascia graft. The groups were compared with respect to the pre- and postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) and the graft success rate. Results The graft success rate was 98.5% (66/67) in the Group A and 94.0% (63/67) in the Group B at 6 months, the difference wasn’t statistically significant (p = 0.362). However, the graft success rate was 97.0% (65/67) in the Group A and 85.1% (57/67) in the Group B at 12 months, the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.034). In addition, only one patient (1.49%) had small keratin pearls in the Group A, no patients developed cholesteatoma of middle ear in either group. Conclusions The endoscopic double layer perichondrium-cartilage graft technique is feasible for repairing medium or larger perforations, it has a better long-term graft success rate and less operative time compared with the single layer fascia graft technique. However, long-term hearing outcomes were the same for the single and double layer closure techniques.
topic Endoscopy
Myringoplasty
Double layer graft
Cartilage-perichondrium
Fascia graft
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-020-00440-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengcailou endoscopicmyringoplastycomparisonofdoublelayercartilageperichondriumgraftandsinglefasciagrafting
_version_ 1724542821842550784