Survey article: the legitimacy of Supreme Courts in the context of globalisation

The objective of this article is to present an overview of the state of the art concerning the legitimacy of Supreme Courts in the context of globalisation. In recent years, there has been much discussion about the observed increase in both the references to foreign decisions in matters of domestic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sidney W. Richards
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2008-12-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.86/
id doaj-464a1b73f2a34435b9846334c0182de2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-464a1b73f2a34435b9846334c0182de22020-11-25T02:10:11ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2008-12-014310412710.18352/ulr.8686Survey article: the legitimacy of Supreme Courts in the context of globalisationSidney W. RichardsThe objective of this article is to present an overview of the state of the art concerning the legitimacy of Supreme Courts in the context of globalisation. In recent years, there has been much discussion about the observed increase in both the references to foreign decisions in matters of domestic adjudication, as well as the alleged and precipitate rise of ‘transjudicial dialogue’, or formal and informal communication between the domestic courts of various national jurisdictions. A central concern is whether Supreme Courts possess the necessary authority, and thus the legitimacy, to adopt a more ‘internationalist’ disposition. This article will demonstrate how there are various coexisting discourses of legitimacy, each with their own particular features. These various discourses are not always compatible or easily commensurable. It will argue, moreover, that the basic dilemma regarding judicial legitimacy in a globalised world is a species of a more general problem of globalisation studies, namely how to reconcile a conceptual vernacular which is permeated by domestic, state-centric notions with a political reality which is increasingly non-national in its outlook.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.86/judicial legitimacyglobalisationtransjudicialismtransjudicial dialogueconstitutional comparativism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sidney W. Richards
spellingShingle Sidney W. Richards
Survey article: the legitimacy of Supreme Courts in the context of globalisation
Utrecht Law Review
judicial legitimacy
globalisation
transjudicialism
transjudicial dialogue
constitutional comparativism
author_facet Sidney W. Richards
author_sort Sidney W. Richards
title Survey article: the legitimacy of Supreme Courts in the context of globalisation
title_short Survey article: the legitimacy of Supreme Courts in the context of globalisation
title_full Survey article: the legitimacy of Supreme Courts in the context of globalisation
title_fullStr Survey article: the legitimacy of Supreme Courts in the context of globalisation
title_full_unstemmed Survey article: the legitimacy of Supreme Courts in the context of globalisation
title_sort survey article: the legitimacy of supreme courts in the context of globalisation
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
series Utrecht Law Review
issn 1871-515X
publishDate 2008-12-01
description The objective of this article is to present an overview of the state of the art concerning the legitimacy of Supreme Courts in the context of globalisation. In recent years, there has been much discussion about the observed increase in both the references to foreign decisions in matters of domestic adjudication, as well as the alleged and precipitate rise of ‘transjudicial dialogue’, or formal and informal communication between the domestic courts of various national jurisdictions. A central concern is whether Supreme Courts possess the necessary authority, and thus the legitimacy, to adopt a more ‘internationalist’ disposition. This article will demonstrate how there are various coexisting discourses of legitimacy, each with their own particular features. These various discourses are not always compatible or easily commensurable. It will argue, moreover, that the basic dilemma regarding judicial legitimacy in a globalised world is a species of a more general problem of globalisation studies, namely how to reconcile a conceptual vernacular which is permeated by domestic, state-centric notions with a political reality which is increasingly non-national in its outlook.
topic judicial legitimacy
globalisation
transjudicialism
transjudicial dialogue
constitutional comparativism
url http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.86/
work_keys_str_mv AT sidneywrichards surveyarticlethelegitimacyofsupremecourtsinthecontextofglobalisation
_version_ 1724920303217278976