The ethical and philosophical antinomy of foundations of Kant’s theory of family law
The present paper focuses on the ethical and anthropological foundations of Kant’s philosophy of family law conceived as a “personal right that is real in kind”: the possibility of possessing a person as a property item presets the antinomy of moral and legal principles, which reproduces the conflic...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
2013-01-01
|
| Series: | Кантовский сборник |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/c44/Судаков%20А.%20К._7-18.pdf |
| id |
doaj-465ebcee66e54832a534676c46a10f66 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-465ebcee66e54832a534676c46a10f662020-11-24T23:05:49ZdeuImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityКантовский сборник0207-69182013-01-012718The ethical and philosophical antinomy of foundations of Kant’s theory of family lawSudakov A. K.The present paper focuses on the ethical and anthropological foundations of Kant’s philosophy of family law conceived as a “personal right that is real in kind”: the possibility of possessing a person as a property item presets the antinomy of moral and legal principles, which reproduces the conflict between Roman naturalistic legal theory and the contractual philosophy of natural law. The author also considers the ways to overcome this antinomy, as well as ensuing solutions to the problems relating to the legal foundations and the subject of family law.http://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/c44/Судаков%20А.%20К._7-18.pdfpersonpersonalitypersonal right that is real in kindhumanity rightpossessionmatrimonyfamilymoral substance |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
deu |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Sudakov A. K. |
| spellingShingle |
Sudakov A. K. The ethical and philosophical antinomy of foundations of Kant’s theory of family law Кантовский сборник person personality personal right that is real in kind humanity right possession matrimony family moral substance |
| author_facet |
Sudakov A. K. |
| author_sort |
Sudakov A. K. |
| title |
The ethical and philosophical antinomy of foundations of Kant’s theory of family law |
| title_short |
The ethical and philosophical antinomy of foundations of Kant’s theory of family law |
| title_full |
The ethical and philosophical antinomy of foundations of Kant’s theory of family law |
| title_fullStr |
The ethical and philosophical antinomy of foundations of Kant’s theory of family law |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The ethical and philosophical antinomy of foundations of Kant’s theory of family law |
| title_sort |
ethical and philosophical antinomy of foundations of kant’s theory of family law |
| publisher |
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University |
| series |
Кантовский сборник |
| issn |
0207-6918 |
| publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
| description |
The present paper focuses on the ethical and anthropological foundations of Kant’s philosophy of family law conceived as a “personal right that is real in kind”: the possibility of possessing a person as a property item presets the antinomy of moral and legal principles, which reproduces the conflict between Roman naturalistic legal theory and the contractual philosophy of natural law. The author also considers the ways to overcome this antinomy, as well as ensuing solutions to the problems relating to the legal foundations and the subject of family law. |
| topic |
person personality personal right that is real in kind humanity right possession matrimony family moral substance |
| url |
http://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/c44/Судаков%20А.%20К._7-18.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT sudakovak theethicalandphilosophicalantinomyoffoundationsofkantstheoryoffamilylaw AT sudakovak ethicalandphilosophicalantinomyoffoundationsofkantstheoryoffamilylaw |
| _version_ |
1725625556875083776 |