Comparison of Different Surgical Methods for Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness and safety of three methods of open necrosectomy, minimally invasive surgery and endoscopic step-up approach for necrotizing pancreatitis.Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and CNKI full text database (CNKI) (to December 25, 2019). RCT, prospect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jianguo Xiao, Xiaojiao Quan, Fang Liu, Wen Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.723605/full
id doaj-467638086d514bf78cdeda508a7d8c4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-467638086d514bf78cdeda508a7d8c4f2021-09-22T05:41:57ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2021-09-01810.3389/fsurg.2021.723605723605Comparison of Different Surgical Methods for Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Meta-AnalysisJianguo Xiao0Jianguo Xiao1Xiaojiao Quan2Fang Liu3Fang Liu4Wen Li5Medicinal School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hainan Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Sanya, ChinaMedicinal School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, ChinaPurpose: To compare the effectiveness and safety of three methods of open necrosectomy, minimally invasive surgery and endoscopic step-up approach for necrotizing pancreatitis.Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and CNKI full text database (CNKI) (to December 25, 2019). RCT, prospective cohort study (PCS), and retrospective cohort study (RCS) comparing the effectiveness and safety of any two of above-mentioned three methods were included.Results: There was no significant difference in major complications or death, and mortality between the minimally invasive surgery treatment group and the endoscopic step-up approach treatment group (RR = 1.66, 95%CI: 0.83–3.33, P = 0.15; RR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.59–1.86, P = 0.87); the incidence rate of new-onset multiple organ failure, enterocutaneous fistula, pancreatic-cutaneous fistula, intra-abdominal bleeding, and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency in the endoscopic step-up approach treatment group was significantly lower than minimally invasive surgery group (RR = 2.65, 95%CI: 1.10–6.36, P = 0.03; RR = 6.63, 95%CI: 1.59–27.60, P = 0.009; RR = 7.73, 95%CI: 3.00–19.89, P < 0.0001; RR = 1.91, 95%CI: 1.13–3.24, P = 0.02; RR = 1.83, 95%CI: 1.9–3.16, P = 0.02); hospital stay in the endoscopic step-up approach group was significantly shorter than minimally invasive surgical treatment group (MD = 11.26, 95%CI: 5.46–17.05, P = 0.0001). The incidence of pancreatic-cutaneous fistula in the endoscopic escalation step therapy group was significantly lower than that in the open necrosectomy group (RR = 0.11, 95%CI: 0.02–0.58, P = 0.009).Conclusion: Compared with minimally invasive surgery and open necrosectomy, although endoscopic step-up approach cannot reduce the main complications or death and mortality of patients, it can significantly reduce the incidence of some serious complications, such as pancreatic-cutaneous fistula, enterocutaneous fistula, intra-abdominal bleeding, endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and can significantly shorten the patient's hospital stay.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.723605/fullnecrotizing pancreatitisminimally invasive surgeryendoscopic step-up approachmeta-analysisopen necrosectomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jianguo Xiao
Jianguo Xiao
Xiaojiao Quan
Fang Liu
Fang Liu
Wen Li
spellingShingle Jianguo Xiao
Jianguo Xiao
Xiaojiao Quan
Fang Liu
Fang Liu
Wen Li
Comparison of Different Surgical Methods for Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis
Frontiers in Surgery
necrotizing pancreatitis
minimally invasive surgery
endoscopic step-up approach
meta-analysis
open necrosectomy
author_facet Jianguo Xiao
Jianguo Xiao
Xiaojiao Quan
Fang Liu
Fang Liu
Wen Li
author_sort Jianguo Xiao
title Comparison of Different Surgical Methods for Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of Different Surgical Methods for Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of Different Surgical Methods for Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Surgical Methods for Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Surgical Methods for Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of different surgical methods for necrotizing pancreatitis: a meta-analysis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Surgery
issn 2296-875X
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Purpose: To compare the effectiveness and safety of three methods of open necrosectomy, minimally invasive surgery and endoscopic step-up approach for necrotizing pancreatitis.Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and CNKI full text database (CNKI) (to December 25, 2019). RCT, prospective cohort study (PCS), and retrospective cohort study (RCS) comparing the effectiveness and safety of any two of above-mentioned three methods were included.Results: There was no significant difference in major complications or death, and mortality between the minimally invasive surgery treatment group and the endoscopic step-up approach treatment group (RR = 1.66, 95%CI: 0.83–3.33, P = 0.15; RR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.59–1.86, P = 0.87); the incidence rate of new-onset multiple organ failure, enterocutaneous fistula, pancreatic-cutaneous fistula, intra-abdominal bleeding, and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency in the endoscopic step-up approach treatment group was significantly lower than minimally invasive surgery group (RR = 2.65, 95%CI: 1.10–6.36, P = 0.03; RR = 6.63, 95%CI: 1.59–27.60, P = 0.009; RR = 7.73, 95%CI: 3.00–19.89, P < 0.0001; RR = 1.91, 95%CI: 1.13–3.24, P = 0.02; RR = 1.83, 95%CI: 1.9–3.16, P = 0.02); hospital stay in the endoscopic step-up approach group was significantly shorter than minimally invasive surgical treatment group (MD = 11.26, 95%CI: 5.46–17.05, P = 0.0001). The incidence of pancreatic-cutaneous fistula in the endoscopic escalation step therapy group was significantly lower than that in the open necrosectomy group (RR = 0.11, 95%CI: 0.02–0.58, P = 0.009).Conclusion: Compared with minimally invasive surgery and open necrosectomy, although endoscopic step-up approach cannot reduce the main complications or death and mortality of patients, it can significantly reduce the incidence of some serious complications, such as pancreatic-cutaneous fistula, enterocutaneous fistula, intra-abdominal bleeding, endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and can significantly shorten the patient's hospital stay.
topic necrotizing pancreatitis
minimally invasive surgery
endoscopic step-up approach
meta-analysis
open necrosectomy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.723605/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jianguoxiao comparisonofdifferentsurgicalmethodsfornecrotizingpancreatitisametaanalysis
AT jianguoxiao comparisonofdifferentsurgicalmethodsfornecrotizingpancreatitisametaanalysis
AT xiaojiaoquan comparisonofdifferentsurgicalmethodsfornecrotizingpancreatitisametaanalysis
AT fangliu comparisonofdifferentsurgicalmethodsfornecrotizingpancreatitisametaanalysis
AT fangliu comparisonofdifferentsurgicalmethodsfornecrotizingpancreatitisametaanalysis
AT wenli comparisonofdifferentsurgicalmethodsfornecrotizingpancreatitisametaanalysis
_version_ 1717371923279642624