Comment on the Thorsten Berndt's Review Essay: "To Go to the Body." Advances in Phenomenological-sociological Identity Theory, published in FQS 4(3)
In this Comment I praise Thorsten BERNDT's review of "To Go to the Body." At the same time I "defend" my identity model, connecting identity and to have a body ("Körper") / being a body ("Leib"), in relation to the following five points: 1) identity resea...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
FQS
2004-01-01
|
Series: | Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/640 |
id |
doaj-46a173a05aa24852b7313319cd2330bf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-46a173a05aa24852b7313319cd2330bf2020-11-24T23:12:09ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272004-01-0151627Comment on the Thorsten Berndt's Review Essay: "To Go to the Body." Advances in Phenomenological-sociological Identity Theory, published in FQS 4(3)Robert Gugutzer0Technische Universität MünchenIn this Comment I praise Thorsten BERNDT's review of "To Go to the Body." At the same time I "defend" my identity model, connecting identity and to have a body ("Körper") / being a body ("Leib"), in relation to the following five points: 1) identity research in the social sciences neglects the body as a fundamental entity of identity development; 2) MEAD's identity concept has a social cognitive bias; 3) interactionist identity theories need a phenomenological addition of "to have a body"/"being a body," because all interactions are bodily; 4) GOFFMAN talked explicitly about the body, but he never developed an identity theory; 5) gender identity development is as a matter of course seen as based on experiences of difference/diversity. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs040147http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/640identityidentity developmentinteractionto have a bodybeing a bodyMeadEriksonBourdieuGoffman |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Robert Gugutzer |
spellingShingle |
Robert Gugutzer Comment on the Thorsten Berndt's Review Essay: "To Go to the Body." Advances in Phenomenological-sociological Identity Theory, published in FQS 4(3) Forum: Qualitative Social Research identity identity development interaction to have a body being a body Mead Erikson Bourdieu Goffman |
author_facet |
Robert Gugutzer |
author_sort |
Robert Gugutzer |
title |
Comment on the Thorsten Berndt's Review Essay: "To Go to the Body." Advances in Phenomenological-sociological Identity Theory, published in FQS 4(3) |
title_short |
Comment on the Thorsten Berndt's Review Essay: "To Go to the Body." Advances in Phenomenological-sociological Identity Theory, published in FQS 4(3) |
title_full |
Comment on the Thorsten Berndt's Review Essay: "To Go to the Body." Advances in Phenomenological-sociological Identity Theory, published in FQS 4(3) |
title_fullStr |
Comment on the Thorsten Berndt's Review Essay: "To Go to the Body." Advances in Phenomenological-sociological Identity Theory, published in FQS 4(3) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comment on the Thorsten Berndt's Review Essay: "To Go to the Body." Advances in Phenomenological-sociological Identity Theory, published in FQS 4(3) |
title_sort |
comment on the thorsten berndt's review essay: "to go to the body." advances in phenomenological-sociological identity theory, published in fqs 4(3) |
publisher |
FQS |
series |
Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
issn |
1438-5627 |
publishDate |
2004-01-01 |
description |
In this Comment I praise Thorsten BERNDT's review of "To Go to the Body." At the same time I "defend" my identity model, connecting identity and to have a body ("Körper") / being a body ("Leib"), in relation to the following five points: 1) identity research in the social sciences neglects the body as a fundamental entity of identity development; 2) MEAD's identity concept has a social cognitive bias; 3) interactionist identity theories need a phenomenological addition of "to have a body"/"being a body," because all interactions are bodily; 4) GOFFMAN talked explicitly about the body, but he never developed an identity theory; 5) gender identity development is as a matter of course seen as based on experiences of difference/diversity.
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs040147 |
topic |
identity identity development interaction to have a body being a body Mead Erikson Bourdieu Goffman |
url |
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/640 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT robertgugutzer commentonthethorstenberndtsreviewessaytogotothebodyadvancesinphenomenologicalsociologicalidentitytheorypublishedinfqs43 |
_version_ |
1725602234046087168 |