Quantifying River Channel Stability at the Basin Scale

This paper examines the feasibility of a basin‐scale scheme for characterising and quantifying river reaches in terms of their geomorphological stability status and potential for morphological adjustment based on auditing stream energy. A River Energy Audit Scheme (REAS) is explored, which in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philip J. Soar, Nicholas P. Wallerstein, Colin R. Thorne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-02-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/9/2/133
id doaj-46aaaedcbdf24173ac275839493b196d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-46aaaedcbdf24173ac275839493b196d2020-11-25T00:47:09ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412017-02-019213310.3390/w9020133w9020133Quantifying River Channel Stability at the Basin ScalePhilip J. Soar0Nicholas P. Wallerstein1Colin R. Thorne2Department of Geography, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3HE, UKSchool of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UKSchool of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UKThis paper examines the feasibility of a basin‐scale scheme for characterising and quantifying river reaches in terms of their geomorphological stability status and potential for morphological adjustment based on auditing stream energy. A River Energy Audit Scheme (REAS) is explored, which involves integrating stream power with flow duration to investigate the downstream distribution of Annual Geomorphic Energy (AGE). This measure represents the average annual energy available with which to perform geomorphological work in reshaping the channel boundary. Changes in AGE between successive reaches might indicate whether adjustments are likely to be led by erosion or deposition at the channel perimeter. A case study of the River Kent in Cumbria, UK, demonstrates that basin‐wide application is achievable without excessive field work and data processing. However, in addressing the basin scale, the research found that this is inevitably at the cost of a number of assumptions and limitations, which are discussed herein. Technological advances in remotely sensed data capture, developments in image processing and emerging GIS tools provide the near‐term prospect of fully quantifying river channel stability at the basin scale, although as yet not fully realized. Potential applications of this type of approach include system‐wide assessment of river channel stability and sensitivity to land‐use or climate change, and informing strategic planning for river channel and flood risk management.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/9/2/133river  channel  stability  stream  power  geomorphic  energy  sediment  transport  morphological  change  Fluvial  Audit  drainage  basin  scale  watershed  assessment  flood  risk  management river restoration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Philip J. Soar
Nicholas P. Wallerstein
Colin R. Thorne
spellingShingle Philip J. Soar
Nicholas P. Wallerstein
Colin R. Thorne
Quantifying River Channel Stability at the Basin Scale
Water
river  channel  stability
  stream  power
  geomorphic  energy
  sediment  transport
  morphological  change
  Fluvial  Audit
  drainage  basin  scale
  watershed  assessment
  flood  risk  management
 river restoration
author_facet Philip J. Soar
Nicholas P. Wallerstein
Colin R. Thorne
author_sort Philip J. Soar
title Quantifying River Channel Stability at the Basin Scale
title_short Quantifying River Channel Stability at the Basin Scale
title_full Quantifying River Channel Stability at the Basin Scale
title_fullStr Quantifying River Channel Stability at the Basin Scale
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying River Channel Stability at the Basin Scale
title_sort quantifying river channel stability at the basin scale
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2017-02-01
description This paper examines the feasibility of a basin‐scale scheme for characterising and quantifying river reaches in terms of their geomorphological stability status and potential for morphological adjustment based on auditing stream energy. A River Energy Audit Scheme (REAS) is explored, which involves integrating stream power with flow duration to investigate the downstream distribution of Annual Geomorphic Energy (AGE). This measure represents the average annual energy available with which to perform geomorphological work in reshaping the channel boundary. Changes in AGE between successive reaches might indicate whether adjustments are likely to be led by erosion or deposition at the channel perimeter. A case study of the River Kent in Cumbria, UK, demonstrates that basin‐wide application is achievable without excessive field work and data processing. However, in addressing the basin scale, the research found that this is inevitably at the cost of a number of assumptions and limitations, which are discussed herein. Technological advances in remotely sensed data capture, developments in image processing and emerging GIS tools provide the near‐term prospect of fully quantifying river channel stability at the basin scale, although as yet not fully realized. Potential applications of this type of approach include system‐wide assessment of river channel stability and sensitivity to land‐use or climate change, and informing strategic planning for river channel and flood risk management.
topic river  channel  stability
  stream  power
  geomorphic  energy
  sediment  transport
  morphological  change
  Fluvial  Audit
  drainage  basin  scale
  watershed  assessment
  flood  risk  management
 river restoration
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/9/2/133
work_keys_str_mv AT philipjsoar quantifyingriverchannelstabilityatthebasinscale
AT nicholaspwallerstein quantifyingriverchannelstabilityatthebasinscale
AT colinrthorne quantifyingriverchannelstabilityatthebasinscale
_version_ 1725261535036571648