Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution

Objective: to validate the content and face of a manual on suicide prevention for university students of the health area. Methods: a methodological research involving two steps: content validation with participation of 13 experts; and semantic validation with participation of 82 health students. Two...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anelys Feitoza Siqueira, Darlisom Sousa Ferreira, Wagner Ferreira Monteiro, Elizabeth Teixeira, Iury Pedro Bento Barbosa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Ceará 2020-02-01
Series:Rev Rene
Subjects:
Online Access:http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/42241/100051
id doaj-46d9529cf44e40248ea75c916aa96a74
record_format Article
spelling doaj-46d9529cf44e40248ea75c916aa96a742020-11-25T04:01:38ZengUniversidade Federal do CearáRev Rene2175-67832020-02-0121e4224110.15253/2175-6783.20202142241Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solutionAnelys Feitoza Siqueira0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9194-9120Darlisom Sousa Ferreira1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3381-1304Wagner Ferreira Monteiro2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3303-3031Elizabeth Teixeira3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5401-8105Iury Pedro Bento Barbosa4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-9884Universidade do Estado do AmazonasUniversidade do Estado do AmazonasUniversidade do Estado do AmazonasUniversidade do Estado do AmazonasSociedade Brasileira de Estudos da Cannabis SativaObjective: to validate the content and face of a manual on suicide prevention for university students of the health area. Methods: a methodological research involving two steps: content validation with participation of 13 experts; and semantic validation with participation of 82 health students. Two questionnaires with a Likert scale were used. The quantitative analysis was based on descriptive statistics to obtain the Content Validity Index and the Semantic Agreement Index. Results: the manual was considered valid by experts and university students, with a content validity index of 0.91 and semantic agreement index of 0.96. However, the manual underwent a textual and illustrative restructuring in the aspects of objectives, relevance, structure and presentation. Conclusion: after validation, the manual proved to be an appropriate tool for educational actions to be distributed to health university students.http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/42241/100051educational technologyhealth educationsuicidevalidation studies.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anelys Feitoza Siqueira
Darlisom Sousa Ferreira
Wagner Ferreira Monteiro
Elizabeth Teixeira
Iury Pedro Bento Barbosa
spellingShingle Anelys Feitoza Siqueira
Darlisom Sousa Ferreira
Wagner Ferreira Monteiro
Elizabeth Teixeira
Iury Pedro Bento Barbosa
Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution
Rev Rene
educational technology
health education
suicide
validation studies.
author_facet Anelys Feitoza Siqueira
Darlisom Sousa Ferreira
Wagner Ferreira Monteiro
Elizabeth Teixeira
Iury Pedro Bento Barbosa
author_sort Anelys Feitoza Siqueira
title Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution
title_short Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution
title_full Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution
title_fullStr Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution
title_sort validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution
publisher Universidade Federal do Ceará
series Rev Rene
issn 2175-6783
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Objective: to validate the content and face of a manual on suicide prevention for university students of the health area. Methods: a methodological research involving two steps: content validation with participation of 13 experts; and semantic validation with participation of 82 health students. Two questionnaires with a Likert scale were used. The quantitative analysis was based on descriptive statistics to obtain the Content Validity Index and the Semantic Agreement Index. Results: the manual was considered valid by experts and university students, with a content validity index of 0.91 and semantic agreement index of 0.96. However, the manual underwent a textual and illustrative restructuring in the aspects of objectives, relevance, structure and presentation. Conclusion: after validation, the manual proved to be an appropriate tool for educational actions to be distributed to health university students.
topic educational technology
health education
suicide
validation studies.
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/42241/100051
work_keys_str_mv AT anelysfeitozasiqueira validationofahandbookonsuicidepreventionamongstudentstalkingisthebestsolution
AT darlisomsousaferreira validationofahandbookonsuicidepreventionamongstudentstalkingisthebestsolution
AT wagnerferreiramonteiro validationofahandbookonsuicidepreventionamongstudentstalkingisthebestsolution
AT elizabethteixeira validationofahandbookonsuicidepreventionamongstudentstalkingisthebestsolution
AT iurypedrobentobarbosa validationofahandbookonsuicidepreventionamongstudentstalkingisthebestsolution
_version_ 1724446066747637760