Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution
Objective: to validate the content and face of a manual on suicide prevention for university students of the health area. Methods: a methodological research involving two steps: content validation with participation of 13 experts; and semantic validation with participation of 82 health students. Two...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal do Ceará
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Rev Rene |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/42241/100051 |
id |
doaj-46d9529cf44e40248ea75c916aa96a74 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-46d9529cf44e40248ea75c916aa96a742020-11-25T04:01:38ZengUniversidade Federal do CearáRev Rene2175-67832020-02-0121e4224110.15253/2175-6783.20202142241Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solutionAnelys Feitoza Siqueira0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9194-9120Darlisom Sousa Ferreira1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3381-1304Wagner Ferreira Monteiro2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3303-3031Elizabeth Teixeira3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5401-8105Iury Pedro Bento Barbosa4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-9884Universidade do Estado do AmazonasUniversidade do Estado do AmazonasUniversidade do Estado do AmazonasUniversidade do Estado do AmazonasSociedade Brasileira de Estudos da Cannabis SativaObjective: to validate the content and face of a manual on suicide prevention for university students of the health area. Methods: a methodological research involving two steps: content validation with participation of 13 experts; and semantic validation with participation of 82 health students. Two questionnaires with a Likert scale were used. The quantitative analysis was based on descriptive statistics to obtain the Content Validity Index and the Semantic Agreement Index. Results: the manual was considered valid by experts and university students, with a content validity index of 0.91 and semantic agreement index of 0.96. However, the manual underwent a textual and illustrative restructuring in the aspects of objectives, relevance, structure and presentation. Conclusion: after validation, the manual proved to be an appropriate tool for educational actions to be distributed to health university students.http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/42241/100051educational technologyhealth educationsuicidevalidation studies. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anelys Feitoza Siqueira Darlisom Sousa Ferreira Wagner Ferreira Monteiro Elizabeth Teixeira Iury Pedro Bento Barbosa |
spellingShingle |
Anelys Feitoza Siqueira Darlisom Sousa Ferreira Wagner Ferreira Monteiro Elizabeth Teixeira Iury Pedro Bento Barbosa Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution Rev Rene educational technology health education suicide validation studies. |
author_facet |
Anelys Feitoza Siqueira Darlisom Sousa Ferreira Wagner Ferreira Monteiro Elizabeth Teixeira Iury Pedro Bento Barbosa |
author_sort |
Anelys Feitoza Siqueira |
title |
Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution |
title_short |
Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution |
title_full |
Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution |
title_fullStr |
Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution |
title_sort |
validation of a handbook on suicide prevention among students: talking is the best solution |
publisher |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
series |
Rev Rene |
issn |
2175-6783 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Objective: to validate the content and face of a manual on suicide prevention for university students of the health area. Methods: a methodological research involving two steps: content validation with participation of 13 experts; and semantic validation with participation of 82 health students. Two questionnaires with a Likert scale were used. The quantitative analysis was based on descriptive statistics to obtain the Content Validity Index and the Semantic Agreement Index. Results: the manual was considered valid by experts and university students, with a content validity index of 0.91 and semantic agreement index of 0.96. However, the manual underwent a textual and illustrative restructuring in the aspects of objectives, relevance, structure and presentation. Conclusion: after validation, the manual proved to be an appropriate tool for educational actions to be distributed to health university students. |
topic |
educational technology health education suicide validation studies. |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/42241/100051 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anelysfeitozasiqueira validationofahandbookonsuicidepreventionamongstudentstalkingisthebestsolution AT darlisomsousaferreira validationofahandbookonsuicidepreventionamongstudentstalkingisthebestsolution AT wagnerferreiramonteiro validationofahandbookonsuicidepreventionamongstudentstalkingisthebestsolution AT elizabethteixeira validationofahandbookonsuicidepreventionamongstudentstalkingisthebestsolution AT iurypedrobentobarbosa validationofahandbookonsuicidepreventionamongstudentstalkingisthebestsolution |
_version_ |
1724446066747637760 |