Continuous Femoral Nerve Block versus Patient-Controlled Analgesia following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Purpose. To compare total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who received continuous femoral nerve block (FNB) with local anaesthetics through a catheter versus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine. Methods. 50 women and 10 men aged 51 to 84 years with matched characteristics u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fu-Yuen Ng, Kwong-Yuen Chiu, Chun Hoi Yan, Kwok-Fu Jacobus Ng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-04-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901202000105
id doaj-4712368ae26c40218c54c204dcefc314
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4712368ae26c40218c54c204dcefc3142020-11-25T03:19:22ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902012-04-012010.1177/230949901202000105Continuous Femoral Nerve Block versus Patient-Controlled Analgesia following Total Knee ArthroplastyFu-Yuen Ng0Kwong-Yuen Chiu1Chun Hoi Yan2Kwok-Fu Jacobus Ng3 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong KongPurpose. To compare total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who received continuous femoral nerve block (FNB) with local anaesthetics through a catheter versus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine. Methods. 50 women and 10 men aged 51 to 84 years with matched characteristics underwent TKA and received either continuous FNB with local anaesthetics through a catheter (n=30) or PCA with intravenous morphine (n=30). None of the patients had had previous knee surgery. All operations were performed according to the standard protocol. Daily mean pain numerical rating scale at rest (NRS-R) and during movement (NRS-M), requirement of extra pain control, complications related to pain control, and overall patient satisfaction in both groups were compared. Results. Both groups were similar in terms of pain NRS-R and NRS-M, overall satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. Within each group, pain NRS-M score was significantly higher than pain NRS-R score. In the FNB group, 3 patients had dislodgement of the femoral catheter on day 1 and switched to PCA with intravenous morphine. Two of them had fair satisfaction. Patients in the PCA group had significantly more side-effects (nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and pruritis); 2 of the 5 patients with nausea and vomiting had fair satisfaction. No patients had any surgical complication. Conclusion. Both FNC and PCA provide reliable pain control.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901202000105
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fu-Yuen Ng
Kwong-Yuen Chiu
Chun Hoi Yan
Kwok-Fu Jacobus Ng
spellingShingle Fu-Yuen Ng
Kwong-Yuen Chiu
Chun Hoi Yan
Kwok-Fu Jacobus Ng
Continuous Femoral Nerve Block versus Patient-Controlled Analgesia following Total Knee Arthroplasty
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Fu-Yuen Ng
Kwong-Yuen Chiu
Chun Hoi Yan
Kwok-Fu Jacobus Ng
author_sort Fu-Yuen Ng
title Continuous Femoral Nerve Block versus Patient-Controlled Analgesia following Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_short Continuous Femoral Nerve Block versus Patient-Controlled Analgesia following Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full Continuous Femoral Nerve Block versus Patient-Controlled Analgesia following Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Continuous Femoral Nerve Block versus Patient-Controlled Analgesia following Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Continuous Femoral Nerve Block versus Patient-Controlled Analgesia following Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_sort continuous femoral nerve block versus patient-controlled analgesia following total knee arthroplasty
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2012-04-01
description Purpose. To compare total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who received continuous femoral nerve block (FNB) with local anaesthetics through a catheter versus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine. Methods. 50 women and 10 men aged 51 to 84 years with matched characteristics underwent TKA and received either continuous FNB with local anaesthetics through a catheter (n=30) or PCA with intravenous morphine (n=30). None of the patients had had previous knee surgery. All operations were performed according to the standard protocol. Daily mean pain numerical rating scale at rest (NRS-R) and during movement (NRS-M), requirement of extra pain control, complications related to pain control, and overall patient satisfaction in both groups were compared. Results. Both groups were similar in terms of pain NRS-R and NRS-M, overall satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. Within each group, pain NRS-M score was significantly higher than pain NRS-R score. In the FNB group, 3 patients had dislodgement of the femoral catheter on day 1 and switched to PCA with intravenous morphine. Two of them had fair satisfaction. Patients in the PCA group had significantly more side-effects (nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and pruritis); 2 of the 5 patients with nausea and vomiting had fair satisfaction. No patients had any surgical complication. Conclusion. Both FNC and PCA provide reliable pain control.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901202000105
work_keys_str_mv AT fuyuenng continuousfemoralnerveblockversuspatientcontrolledanalgesiafollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT kwongyuenchiu continuousfemoralnerveblockversuspatientcontrolledanalgesiafollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT chunhoiyan continuousfemoralnerveblockversuspatientcontrolledanalgesiafollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT kwokfujacobusng continuousfemoralnerveblockversuspatientcontrolledanalgesiafollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
_version_ 1724622845123756032