Management of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Background. Failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (CS) may be partial or complete and the subsequent discomfort is the most commonly cited cause of litigation in obstetric anaesthesia. Objectives. To determine if there is a standardised approach to: (i) testing the level of block of spina...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Health and Medical Publishing Group
2017-07-01
|
Series: | South African Medical Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.samj.org.za/index.php/samj/article/view/11935/8100 |
id |
doaj-47430c71c0fc4f21a0e58c7bbd389c57 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-47430c71c0fc4f21a0e58c7bbd389c572020-11-25T00:55:38ZengHealth and Medical Publishing GroupSouth African Medical Journal0256-95742078-51352017-07-01107761161410.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i7.12056Management of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean sectionGavin Wyndham Jones0Raphael Anthony Samuel1Bruce McClure Biccard2Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa Private Practice, Durban, South AfricaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, South AfricaBackground. Failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (CS) may be partial or complete and the subsequent discomfort is the most commonly cited cause of litigation in obstetric anaesthesia. Objectives. To determine if there is a standardised approach to: (i) testing the level of block of spinal anaesthesia; and (ii) the management of failed spinal anaesthesia for CS. Methods. A structured questionnaire to ascertain the current practice of testing the level of block and management of three different scenarios of failed spinal anaesthesia was distributed to 51 government hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (SA). All obstetric anaesthetic service providers, ranging from interns to specialist anaesthetists, were invited to complete the questionnaire. Results. A total of 375 responses were received from 42 of the 51 hospitals surveyed. Specialist anaesthetists managed failure of spinal anaesthesia significantly differently than other anaesthetic service providers. Specialists were more likely to convert to a general anaesthetic (GA), while others were more likely to repeat spinal anaesthesia or administer intravenous ketamine, midazolam and opioids. Only 212 respondents (56%) tested the level of block and there was no difference between the groups with regard to the method of assessment of height (p=0.15). Non-specialists, however, accepted a significantly lower level of block, using pinprick, than specialists (p=0.027), which could lead to a higher failure rate. More than one-third of non-specialists did not consider themselves competent to perform a GA and >90% of respondents agreed that a ‘failed’ spinal algorithm would be useful. Conclusion. There is a need for standardised assessment of the adequacy of spinal anaesthesia for CS in SA, as well as a failed spinal algorithm. http://www.samj.org.za/index.php/samj/article/view/11935/8100AnaesthesiologyobstetricsManagement of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gavin Wyndham Jones Raphael Anthony Samuel Bruce McClure Biccard |
spellingShingle |
Gavin Wyndham Jones Raphael Anthony Samuel Bruce McClure Biccard Management of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section South African Medical Journal Anaesthesiology obstetrics Management of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section |
author_facet |
Gavin Wyndham Jones Raphael Anthony Samuel Bruce McClure Biccard |
author_sort |
Gavin Wyndham Jones |
title |
Management of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section |
title_short |
Management of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section |
title_full |
Management of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section |
title_fullStr |
Management of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section |
title_full_unstemmed |
Management of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section |
title_sort |
management of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section |
publisher |
Health and Medical Publishing Group |
series |
South African Medical Journal |
issn |
0256-9574 2078-5135 |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
Background. Failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (CS) may be partial or complete and the subsequent discomfort is the most commonly cited cause of litigation in obstetric anaesthesia.
Objectives. To determine if there is a standardised approach to: (i) testing the level of block of spinal anaesthesia; and (ii) the management of failed spinal anaesthesia for CS.
Methods. A structured questionnaire to ascertain the current practice of testing the level of block and management of three different scenarios of failed spinal anaesthesia was distributed to 51 government hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (SA). All obstetric anaesthetic service providers, ranging from interns to specialist anaesthetists, were invited to complete the questionnaire.
Results. A total of 375 responses were received from 42 of the 51 hospitals surveyed. Specialist anaesthetists managed failure of spinal anaesthesia significantly differently than other anaesthetic service providers. Specialists were more likely to convert to a general anaesthetic (GA), while others were more likely to repeat spinal anaesthesia or administer intravenous ketamine, midazolam and opioids. Only 212 respondents (56%) tested the level of block and there was no difference between the groups with regard to the method of assessment of height (p=0.15). Non-specialists, however, accepted a significantly lower level of block, using pinprick, than specialists (p=0.027), which could lead to a higher failure rate. More than one-third of non-specialists did not consider themselves competent to perform a GA and >90% of respondents agreed that a ‘failed’ spinal algorithm would be useful.
Conclusion. There is a need for standardised assessment of the adequacy of spinal anaesthesia for CS in SA, as well as a failed spinal algorithm.
|
topic |
Anaesthesiology obstetrics Management of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section |
url |
http://www.samj.org.za/index.php/samj/article/view/11935/8100 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gavinwyndhamjones managementoffailedspinalanaesthesiaforcaesareansection AT raphaelanthonysamuel managementoffailedspinalanaesthesiaforcaesareansection AT brucemcclurebiccard managementoffailedspinalanaesthesiaforcaesareansection |
_version_ |
1725230072171855872 |