Marxova znanstvena revolucija in njena relevantnost za sodobno družboslovje

Marx’s scientific revolution is not an intervention into a certain specific theory of political economy, but an intervention in the form of critique of fundamental presuppositions of political economy in general. Hence, the theoretical apparatus of the critique of political economy can also be used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sašo Furlan
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculy of Arts) 2013-08-01
Series:Ars & Humanitas
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/744
id doaj-47639b8bdfb94739b919778a6c0b00dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-47639b8bdfb94739b919778a6c0b00dc2021-04-02T15:33:41ZdeuZnanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculy of Arts)Ars & Humanitas1854-96322350-42182013-08-0171788710.4312/ars.7.1.78-87744Marxova znanstvena revolucija in njena relevantnost za sodobno družboslovjeSašo FurlanMarx’s scientific revolution is not an intervention into a certain specific theory of political economy, but an intervention in the form of critique of fundamental presuppositions of political economy in general. Hence, the theoretical apparatus of the critique of political economy can also be used as a tool for intervening into the field of contemporary social sciences, particularly into neoclassical political economy and modern bourgeois sociology, insofar as they are based precisely on the presuppositions that are the object of Marx’s critique. Following Michael Heinrich’s interpretation of Marx’s critical theory, the article argues that Marx’s critique of political economy consists of four fundamental breaks with the theoretical field of classical political economy, that is, with the latter’s anthropologism, individualism, empiricism and ahistoricism. This critique is primarily directed not toward individual theories of political economy, but toward the presuppositions shared by all theories of political economy.https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/744znanstvena revolucijakritika politične ekonomijeklasična politična ekonomijaneoklasična ekonomikasociologija
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sašo Furlan
spellingShingle Sašo Furlan
Marxova znanstvena revolucija in njena relevantnost za sodobno družboslovje
Ars & Humanitas
znanstvena revolucija
kritika politične ekonomije
klasična politična ekonomija
neoklasična ekonomika
sociologija
author_facet Sašo Furlan
author_sort Sašo Furlan
title Marxova znanstvena revolucija in njena relevantnost za sodobno družboslovje
title_short Marxova znanstvena revolucija in njena relevantnost za sodobno družboslovje
title_full Marxova znanstvena revolucija in njena relevantnost za sodobno družboslovje
title_fullStr Marxova znanstvena revolucija in njena relevantnost za sodobno družboslovje
title_full_unstemmed Marxova znanstvena revolucija in njena relevantnost za sodobno družboslovje
title_sort marxova znanstvena revolucija in njena relevantnost za sodobno družboslovje
publisher Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculy of Arts)
series Ars & Humanitas
issn 1854-9632
2350-4218
publishDate 2013-08-01
description Marx’s scientific revolution is not an intervention into a certain specific theory of political economy, but an intervention in the form of critique of fundamental presuppositions of political economy in general. Hence, the theoretical apparatus of the critique of political economy can also be used as a tool for intervening into the field of contemporary social sciences, particularly into neoclassical political economy and modern bourgeois sociology, insofar as they are based precisely on the presuppositions that are the object of Marx’s critique. Following Michael Heinrich’s interpretation of Marx’s critical theory, the article argues that Marx’s critique of political economy consists of four fundamental breaks with the theoretical field of classical political economy, that is, with the latter’s anthropologism, individualism, empiricism and ahistoricism. This critique is primarily directed not toward individual theories of political economy, but toward the presuppositions shared by all theories of political economy.
topic znanstvena revolucija
kritika politične ekonomije
klasična politična ekonomija
neoklasična ekonomika
sociologija
url https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/744
work_keys_str_mv AT sasofurlan marxovaznanstvenarevolucijainnjenarelevantnostzasodobnodruzboslovje
_version_ 1721559655685029888