Comparative metagenomics of viral assemblages inhabiting four phyla of marine invertebrates

Viruses are the most abundant biological entities on Earth, killing 10-20% of oceanic biomass each day. However, despite their ecological importance, viruses inhabiting many echinoderms, cnidarians, urochordates, and marine arthropods have not been investigated with significant breadth. We conducted...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brent Michael Gudenkauf, Ian eHewson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmars.2016.00023/full
id doaj-47682e11b727400991ce4316dae3442f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-47682e11b727400991ce4316dae3442f2020-11-24T22:05:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452016-03-01310.3389/fmars.2016.00023178028Comparative metagenomics of viral assemblages inhabiting four phyla of marine invertebratesBrent Michael Gudenkauf0Ian eHewson1Cornell UniversityCornell UniversityViruses are the most abundant biological entities on Earth, killing 10-20% of oceanic biomass each day. However, despite their ecological importance, viruses inhabiting many echinoderms, cnidarians, urochordates, and marine arthropods have not been investigated with significant breadth. We conducted a broad survey of the viral assemblages inhabiting these hosts through viral metagenomics and phylogenetic analysis. Results indicate that different invertebrate groups harbor distinct viral assemblages. Interestingly, however, no significant difference is observed between the viral assemblages of echinoderms and arthropods. These similarities and differences may be due to cellular, immunological, geographical, and ecological differences amongst host phyla, although mechanistic determination is beyond the purview of this work. Additionally, we present evidence of the detection of several viral families that have not yet been observed in these hosts. Finally, we confirm the result of previous investigation that method of library construction significantly biases metagenomic results by altering the representation of of ssDNA and dsDNA viral genomes.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmars.2016.00023/fullCircovirusZooplanktonvirusinvertebratemetazoa
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brent Michael Gudenkauf
Ian eHewson
spellingShingle Brent Michael Gudenkauf
Ian eHewson
Comparative metagenomics of viral assemblages inhabiting four phyla of marine invertebrates
Frontiers in Marine Science
Circovirus
Zooplankton
virus
invertebrate
metazoa
author_facet Brent Michael Gudenkauf
Ian eHewson
author_sort Brent Michael Gudenkauf
title Comparative metagenomics of viral assemblages inhabiting four phyla of marine invertebrates
title_short Comparative metagenomics of viral assemblages inhabiting four phyla of marine invertebrates
title_full Comparative metagenomics of viral assemblages inhabiting four phyla of marine invertebrates
title_fullStr Comparative metagenomics of viral assemblages inhabiting four phyla of marine invertebrates
title_full_unstemmed Comparative metagenomics of viral assemblages inhabiting four phyla of marine invertebrates
title_sort comparative metagenomics of viral assemblages inhabiting four phyla of marine invertebrates
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Marine Science
issn 2296-7745
publishDate 2016-03-01
description Viruses are the most abundant biological entities on Earth, killing 10-20% of oceanic biomass each day. However, despite their ecological importance, viruses inhabiting many echinoderms, cnidarians, urochordates, and marine arthropods have not been investigated with significant breadth. We conducted a broad survey of the viral assemblages inhabiting these hosts through viral metagenomics and phylogenetic analysis. Results indicate that different invertebrate groups harbor distinct viral assemblages. Interestingly, however, no significant difference is observed between the viral assemblages of echinoderms and arthropods. These similarities and differences may be due to cellular, immunological, geographical, and ecological differences amongst host phyla, although mechanistic determination is beyond the purview of this work. Additionally, we present evidence of the detection of several viral families that have not yet been observed in these hosts. Finally, we confirm the result of previous investigation that method of library construction significantly biases metagenomic results by altering the representation of of ssDNA and dsDNA viral genomes.
topic Circovirus
Zooplankton
virus
invertebrate
metazoa
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmars.2016.00023/full
work_keys_str_mv AT brentmichaelgudenkauf comparativemetagenomicsofviralassemblagesinhabitingfourphylaofmarineinvertebrates
AT ianehewson comparativemetagenomicsofviralassemblagesinhabitingfourphylaofmarineinvertebrates
_version_ 1725824131238199296