Understanding sustainability for socially responsible investing and reporting

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine what types of sustainability activities companies are reporting and whether persons external to the companies understand how those reported activities correspond to the companies’ narratives about sustainability. That is to ascertain how people int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marianne Bradford, Julia B. Earp, Paul F. Williams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Publishing 2017-11-01
Series:Journal of Capital Markets Studies
Subjects:
CSR
Online Access:https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/JCMS-10-2017-005
id doaj-476fa0861db947999ca1ec8d96cbb54d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-476fa0861db947999ca1ec8d96cbb54d2020-11-25T01:13:04ZengEmerald PublishingJournal of Capital Markets Studies2514-47742017-11-0111103510.1108/JCMS-10-2017-005599736Understanding sustainability for socially responsible investing and reportingMarianne Bradford0Julia B. Earp1Paul F. Williams2Poole College of Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USAPoole College of Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USAPoole College of Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USAPurpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine what types of sustainability activities companies are reporting and whether persons external to the companies understand how those reported activities correspond to the companies’ narratives about sustainability. That is to ascertain how people interpret the meaning of the activities included in the sustainability reports. Design/methodology/approach - From a sample of sustainability reports prepared by Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines, the authors identified the distinct activities reported. The authors prepared a survey comprised of these activities and asked a sample of people knowledgeable about business and investing to evaluate each activity on the extent to which they are relevant to sustainability performance. The responses were then factor analyzed to identify the most important dimensions of sustainability these persons employed to relate the activities to sustainability. Findings - The dimensions employed by the subjects differed in some significant ways from those dimensions used to construct the GRI format. Subjects evaluated sustainability efforts as primarily efforts of being a good citizen with sustainability an end in itself rather than as constraint to be respected in achieving profitability goals. Research limitations/implications - The study is a first attempt so results are preliminary, i.e. suggestive but not definitive. Though preliminary an intriguing implication is that closure on a sustainability reporting structure would be premature. More effort needs to be devoted to provide more clarity on the concept of corporate sustainability and what its implications are for corporate behavior. Practical implications - Given the results that sustainability be regarded as a corporate end, what is the role of the corporation in society seems still to be disputatious. Sustainability may not be something achievable without changes in corporate law. Originality/value - The study is an early attempt to assess the potential alternative narratives about corporate sustainability. Its value lies in providing insights into the age-old question of what should be the role of the corporation in a free society.https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/JCMS-10-2017-005CSRSustainabilityGlobal reporting initiativeSustainability reportingStakeholder narratives
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marianne Bradford
Julia B. Earp
Paul F. Williams
spellingShingle Marianne Bradford
Julia B. Earp
Paul F. Williams
Understanding sustainability for socially responsible investing and reporting
Journal of Capital Markets Studies
CSR
Sustainability
Global reporting initiative
Sustainability reporting
Stakeholder narratives
author_facet Marianne Bradford
Julia B. Earp
Paul F. Williams
author_sort Marianne Bradford
title Understanding sustainability for socially responsible investing and reporting
title_short Understanding sustainability for socially responsible investing and reporting
title_full Understanding sustainability for socially responsible investing and reporting
title_fullStr Understanding sustainability for socially responsible investing and reporting
title_full_unstemmed Understanding sustainability for socially responsible investing and reporting
title_sort understanding sustainability for socially responsible investing and reporting
publisher Emerald Publishing
series Journal of Capital Markets Studies
issn 2514-4774
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine what types of sustainability activities companies are reporting and whether persons external to the companies understand how those reported activities correspond to the companies’ narratives about sustainability. That is to ascertain how people interpret the meaning of the activities included in the sustainability reports. Design/methodology/approach - From a sample of sustainability reports prepared by Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines, the authors identified the distinct activities reported. The authors prepared a survey comprised of these activities and asked a sample of people knowledgeable about business and investing to evaluate each activity on the extent to which they are relevant to sustainability performance. The responses were then factor analyzed to identify the most important dimensions of sustainability these persons employed to relate the activities to sustainability. Findings - The dimensions employed by the subjects differed in some significant ways from those dimensions used to construct the GRI format. Subjects evaluated sustainability efforts as primarily efforts of being a good citizen with sustainability an end in itself rather than as constraint to be respected in achieving profitability goals. Research limitations/implications - The study is a first attempt so results are preliminary, i.e. suggestive but not definitive. Though preliminary an intriguing implication is that closure on a sustainability reporting structure would be premature. More effort needs to be devoted to provide more clarity on the concept of corporate sustainability and what its implications are for corporate behavior. Practical implications - Given the results that sustainability be regarded as a corporate end, what is the role of the corporation in society seems still to be disputatious. Sustainability may not be something achievable without changes in corporate law. Originality/value - The study is an early attempt to assess the potential alternative narratives about corporate sustainability. Its value lies in providing insights into the age-old question of what should be the role of the corporation in a free society.
topic CSR
Sustainability
Global reporting initiative
Sustainability reporting
Stakeholder narratives
url https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/JCMS-10-2017-005
work_keys_str_mv AT mariannebradford understandingsustainabilityforsociallyresponsibleinvestingandreporting
AT juliabearp understandingsustainabilityforsociallyresponsibleinvestingandreporting
AT paulfwilliams understandingsustainabilityforsociallyresponsibleinvestingandreporting
_version_ 1725163531826888704