Methodological issues on “challenges and opportunities towards the road of universal health coverage (UHC) in Nepal: a systematic review”
Abstract Systematic reviews adhere to the principle that science is cumulative and attempt to identify all empirical evidence in accordance with pre-determined eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. Therefore, in order to achieve reliable findings, these studies must use an exp...
Main Authors: | Mehrdad Amir-Behghadami, Ali Janati, Masoumeh Gholizadeh |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Archives of Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13690-020-00417-y |
Similar Items
-
Methodological Issues on the Importance of Instrument Validation in Cross-Sectional Health Research
by: Mehrdad Amir-Behghadami, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
How to Report Systematic Review Studies; A Critical Review of Some Methodological Issues and Recommendations to Consider When Conducting These Studies
by: Mehrdad Amir Behghadami, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Systematic Reviews: Are They Actually Well Conducted and Reported in Accordance with PRISMA?
by: Masoumeh Gholizadeh, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Methodological issues on ‘challenges and opportunities towards the road of universal health coverage (UHC) in Nepal: a systematic review’
by: Chhabi Lal Ranabhat, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Poor Quality in Systematic Reviews on PTSD and EMDR – An Examination of Search Methodology and Reporting
by: Elin Opheim, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)