The Contribution of Multiple Use Forest Management to Small Farmers’ Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon

Small-scale farmers in the Brazilian Amazon collectively hold tenure over more than 12 million ha of permanent forest reserves, as required by the Forest Code. The trade-off between forest conservation and other land uses entails opportunity costs for them and for the country, which have not been s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Plinio Sist, Philippe Sablayrolles, Sophie Barthelon, Liz Sousa-Ota, Jean-François Kibler, Ademir Ruschel, Marcelo Santos-Melo, Driss Ezzine-de-Blas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-06-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/5/7/1508
id doaj-47f202f39def4e6fadc71bf521d18eeb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-47f202f39def4e6fadc71bf521d18eeb2020-11-24T23:01:34ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072014-06-01571508153110.3390/f5071508f5071508The Contribution of Multiple Use Forest Management to Small Farmers’ Annual Incomes in the Eastern AmazonPlinio Sist0Philippe Sablayrolles1Sophie Barthelon2Liz Sousa-Ota3Jean-François Kibler4Ademir Ruschel5Marcelo Santos-Melo6Driss Ezzine-de-Blas7Cirad (Centre international de coopération en recherche agronomique pour le développement) UR (B&SEF) "Biens et Services des Ecosystèmes Forestiers tropicaux" Campus International de Baillarguet, TA C-105/D, Montpellier 34398, Cedex 5 FranceGret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques) Rua Antônio Barreto 983, Edf Montblanc Ap 1301 Umarizal-Belém, PA 66055-050, BrazilGret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques) Rua Antônio Barreto 983, Edf Montblanc Ap 1301 Umarizal-Belém, PA 66055-050, BrazilUNESP (Universidade Estadual Paulista) Faculdade de Cienças Agrarias/UNESP-Botucatu 18.610-307, BrazilGret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques) Rua Antônio Barreto 983, Edf Montblanc Ap 1301 Umarizal-Belém, PA 66055-050, BrazilEmbrapa, Amazonia Oriental Travessa Dr. Eneas Pinheiro, s/n. Caixa Postal, Belém, PA 66095-100, BrazilServiço Florestal Brasileiro MMA/SFB Rua Rosa Vermelha n 739, Bairro Aeroporto Velho 68.010-200-Santarém, Pará, BrazilCirad (Centre international de coopération en recherche agronomique pour le développement) UR (B&SEF) "Biens et Services des Ecosystèmes Forestiers tropicaux" Campus International de Baillarguet, TA C-105/D, Montpellier 34398, Cedex 5 FranceSmall-scale farmers in the Brazilian Amazon collectively hold tenure over more than 12 million ha of permanent forest reserves, as required by the Forest Code. The trade-off between forest conservation and other land uses entails opportunity costs for them and for the country, which have not been sufficiently studied. We assessed the potential income generated by multiple use forest management for farmers and compared it to the income potentially derived from six other agricultural land uses. Income from the forest was from (i) logging, carried out by a logging company in partnership with farmers’ associations; and (ii) harvesting the seeds of Carapa guianensis (local name andiroba) for the production of oil. We then compared the income generated by multiple-use forest management with the income from different types of agrarian systems. According to our calculations in this study, the mean annual economic benefits from multiple forest use are the same as the least productive agrarian system, but only 25% of the annual income generated by the most productive system. Although the income generated by logging may be considered low when calculated on an annual basis and compared to incomes generated by agriculture, the one-time payment after logging is significant (US$5,800 to US$33,508) and could be used to implement more intensive and productive cropping systems such as planting black pepper. The income from forest management could also be used to establish permanent fields in deforested areas for highly productive annual crops using conservation agriculture techniques. These techniques are alternatives to the traditional land use based on periodic clearing of the forest. Nevertheless, the shift in current practices towards adoption of more sustainable conservation agriculture techniques will also require the technical and legal support of the State to help small farmers apply these alternatives, which aim to integrate forest management in sustainable agricultural production systems.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/5/7/1508multiple-use forest managementcommunity forestryAmazonnon-timber forest productssmall farming
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Plinio Sist
Philippe Sablayrolles
Sophie Barthelon
Liz Sousa-Ota
Jean-François Kibler
Ademir Ruschel
Marcelo Santos-Melo
Driss Ezzine-de-Blas
spellingShingle Plinio Sist
Philippe Sablayrolles
Sophie Barthelon
Liz Sousa-Ota
Jean-François Kibler
Ademir Ruschel
Marcelo Santos-Melo
Driss Ezzine-de-Blas
The Contribution of Multiple Use Forest Management to Small Farmers’ Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon
Forests
multiple-use forest management
community forestry
Amazon
non-timber forest products
small farming
author_facet Plinio Sist
Philippe Sablayrolles
Sophie Barthelon
Liz Sousa-Ota
Jean-François Kibler
Ademir Ruschel
Marcelo Santos-Melo
Driss Ezzine-de-Blas
author_sort Plinio Sist
title The Contribution of Multiple Use Forest Management to Small Farmers’ Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon
title_short The Contribution of Multiple Use Forest Management to Small Farmers’ Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon
title_full The Contribution of Multiple Use Forest Management to Small Farmers’ Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon
title_fullStr The Contribution of Multiple Use Forest Management to Small Farmers’ Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon
title_full_unstemmed The Contribution of Multiple Use Forest Management to Small Farmers’ Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon
title_sort contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers’ annual incomes in the eastern amazon
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2014-06-01
description Small-scale farmers in the Brazilian Amazon collectively hold tenure over more than 12 million ha of permanent forest reserves, as required by the Forest Code. The trade-off between forest conservation and other land uses entails opportunity costs for them and for the country, which have not been sufficiently studied. We assessed the potential income generated by multiple use forest management for farmers and compared it to the income potentially derived from six other agricultural land uses. Income from the forest was from (i) logging, carried out by a logging company in partnership with farmers’ associations; and (ii) harvesting the seeds of Carapa guianensis (local name andiroba) for the production of oil. We then compared the income generated by multiple-use forest management with the income from different types of agrarian systems. According to our calculations in this study, the mean annual economic benefits from multiple forest use are the same as the least productive agrarian system, but only 25% of the annual income generated by the most productive system. Although the income generated by logging may be considered low when calculated on an annual basis and compared to incomes generated by agriculture, the one-time payment after logging is significant (US$5,800 to US$33,508) and could be used to implement more intensive and productive cropping systems such as planting black pepper. The income from forest management could also be used to establish permanent fields in deforested areas for highly productive annual crops using conservation agriculture techniques. These techniques are alternatives to the traditional land use based on periodic clearing of the forest. Nevertheless, the shift in current practices towards adoption of more sustainable conservation agriculture techniques will also require the technical and legal support of the State to help small farmers apply these alternatives, which aim to integrate forest management in sustainable agricultural production systems.
topic multiple-use forest management
community forestry
Amazon
non-timber forest products
small farming
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/5/7/1508
work_keys_str_mv AT pliniosist thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT philippesablayrolles thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT sophiebarthelon thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT lizsousaota thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT jeanfrancoiskibler thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT ademirruschel thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT marcelosantosmelo thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT drissezzinedeblas thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT pliniosist contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT philippesablayrolles contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT sophiebarthelon contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT lizsousaota contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT jeanfrancoiskibler contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT ademirruschel contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT marcelosantosmelo contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT drissezzinedeblas contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
_version_ 1725639145897852928