The Use of Decision Support Systems in Forest Management: Analysis of FORSYS Country Reports

From 2009 to 2013, a group of more than 100 researchers from 26 countries, under a COST-Action project named FORSYS, worked on a review of the use of forest management decision support systems (FMDSS). Guided by a template, local researchers conducted assessments of FMDSS use in their countries; the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silvana Nobre, Ljusk-Ola Eriksson, Renats Trubins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-03-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/3/72
id doaj-480a4ce87dca45078e45fd3dff4337ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-480a4ce87dca45078e45fd3dff4337ea2020-11-24T20:43:30ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072016-03-01737210.3390/f7030072f7030072The Use of Decision Support Systems in Forest Management: Analysis of FORSYS Country ReportsSilvana Nobre0Ljusk-Ola Eriksson1Renats Trubins2Atrium Forest Consulting, Piracicaba, 13416-380, BrazilDepartment of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea 901 83, SwedenSouthern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 49, Alnarp 23053, SwedenFrom 2009 to 2013, a group of more than 100 researchers from 26 countries, under a COST-Action project named FORSYS, worked on a review of the use of forest management decision support systems (FMDSS). Guided by a template, local researchers conducted assessments of FMDSS use in their countries; their results were documented in Country Reports. In this study, we have used the Country Reports to construct a summary of FMDSS use. For the purposes of our analysis, we conducted a two-round categorisation of the main themes to describe the most relevant aspects of FMDSS use. The material produced was used to generate quantitative summaries of (i) the types of problem where FMDSS are used, (ii) models and methods used to solve these problems, (iii) knowledge management techniques, and (iv) participatory planning techniques. Beyond this, a qualitative analysis identified and summarised the local researchers’ primary concerns, recorded in the conclusions to the Country Reports; we designated these “lessons learned”. Results from the quantitative analysis suggested that most of the participant countries were making use of latest generation FMDSS. A few did not have practical problems that justified the use of such technology or they were still at the beginning of the process of building models to solve their own forest problems.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/3/72decision support systemsforest managementinformation technology in forestry
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Silvana Nobre
Ljusk-Ola Eriksson
Renats Trubins
spellingShingle Silvana Nobre
Ljusk-Ola Eriksson
Renats Trubins
The Use of Decision Support Systems in Forest Management: Analysis of FORSYS Country Reports
Forests
decision support systems
forest management
information technology in forestry
author_facet Silvana Nobre
Ljusk-Ola Eriksson
Renats Trubins
author_sort Silvana Nobre
title The Use of Decision Support Systems in Forest Management: Analysis of FORSYS Country Reports
title_short The Use of Decision Support Systems in Forest Management: Analysis of FORSYS Country Reports
title_full The Use of Decision Support Systems in Forest Management: Analysis of FORSYS Country Reports
title_fullStr The Use of Decision Support Systems in Forest Management: Analysis of FORSYS Country Reports
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Decision Support Systems in Forest Management: Analysis of FORSYS Country Reports
title_sort use of decision support systems in forest management: analysis of forsys country reports
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2016-03-01
description From 2009 to 2013, a group of more than 100 researchers from 26 countries, under a COST-Action project named FORSYS, worked on a review of the use of forest management decision support systems (FMDSS). Guided by a template, local researchers conducted assessments of FMDSS use in their countries; their results were documented in Country Reports. In this study, we have used the Country Reports to construct a summary of FMDSS use. For the purposes of our analysis, we conducted a two-round categorisation of the main themes to describe the most relevant aspects of FMDSS use. The material produced was used to generate quantitative summaries of (i) the types of problem where FMDSS are used, (ii) models and methods used to solve these problems, (iii) knowledge management techniques, and (iv) participatory planning techniques. Beyond this, a qualitative analysis identified and summarised the local researchers’ primary concerns, recorded in the conclusions to the Country Reports; we designated these “lessons learned”. Results from the quantitative analysis suggested that most of the participant countries were making use of latest generation FMDSS. A few did not have practical problems that justified the use of such technology or they were still at the beginning of the process of building models to solve their own forest problems.
topic decision support systems
forest management
information technology in forestry
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/3/72
work_keys_str_mv AT silvananobre theuseofdecisionsupportsystemsinforestmanagementanalysisofforsyscountryreports
AT ljuskolaeriksson theuseofdecisionsupportsystemsinforestmanagementanalysisofforsyscountryreports
AT renatstrubins theuseofdecisionsupportsystemsinforestmanagementanalysisofforsyscountryreports
AT silvananobre useofdecisionsupportsystemsinforestmanagementanalysisofforsyscountryreports
AT ljuskolaeriksson useofdecisionsupportsystemsinforestmanagementanalysisofforsyscountryreports
AT renatstrubins useofdecisionsupportsystemsinforestmanagementanalysisofforsyscountryreports
_version_ 1716819698092343296