Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Observational cohort studies have suggested that minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is associated with better short-term outcomes compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP), such as less intraoperative blood loss, lower morbidity, shorter length of hospital stay,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thijs de Rooij, Jony van Hilst, Jantien A. Vogel, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, Marieke T. de Boer, Djamila Boerma, Peter B. van den Boezem, Bert A. Bonsing, Koop Bosscha, Peter-Paul Coene, Freek Daams, Ronald M. van Dam, Marcel G. Dijkgraaf, Casper H. van Eijck, Sebastiaan Festen, Michael F. Gerhards, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Jeroen Hagendoorn, Erwin van der Harst, Ignace H. de Hingh, Cees H. Dejong, Geert Kazemier, Joost Klaase, Ruben H. de Kleine, Cornelis J. van Laarhoven, Daan J. Lips, Misha D. Luyer, I. Quintus Molenaar, Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs, Gijs A. Patijn, Daphne Roos, Joris J. Scheepers, George P. van der Schelling, Pascal Steenvoorde, Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg, Jan H. Wijsman, Moh’d Abu Hilal, Olivier R. Busch, Marc G. Besselink, for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-04-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-1892-9
id doaj-48126af9caf94e8aa02a77e625589467
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thijs de Rooij
Jony van Hilst
Jantien A. Vogel
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
Marieke T. de Boer
Djamila Boerma
Peter B. van den Boezem
Bert A. Bonsing
Koop Bosscha
Peter-Paul Coene
Freek Daams
Ronald M. van Dam
Marcel G. Dijkgraaf
Casper H. van Eijck
Sebastiaan Festen
Michael F. Gerhards
Bas Groot Koerkamp
Jeroen Hagendoorn
Erwin van der Harst
Ignace H. de Hingh
Cees H. Dejong
Geert Kazemier
Joost Klaase
Ruben H. de Kleine
Cornelis J. van Laarhoven
Daan J. Lips
Misha D. Luyer
I. Quintus Molenaar
Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs
Gijs A. Patijn
Daphne Roos
Joris J. Scheepers
George P. van der Schelling
Pascal Steenvoorde
Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
Jan H. Wijsman
Moh’d Abu Hilal
Olivier R. Busch
Marc G. Besselink
for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
spellingShingle Thijs de Rooij
Jony van Hilst
Jantien A. Vogel
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
Marieke T. de Boer
Djamila Boerma
Peter B. van den Boezem
Bert A. Bonsing
Koop Bosscha
Peter-Paul Coene
Freek Daams
Ronald M. van Dam
Marcel G. Dijkgraaf
Casper H. van Eijck
Sebastiaan Festen
Michael F. Gerhards
Bas Groot Koerkamp
Jeroen Hagendoorn
Erwin van der Harst
Ignace H. de Hingh
Cees H. Dejong
Geert Kazemier
Joost Klaase
Ruben H. de Kleine
Cornelis J. van Laarhoven
Daan J. Lips
Misha D. Luyer
I. Quintus Molenaar
Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs
Gijs A. Patijn
Daphne Roos
Joris J. Scheepers
George P. van der Schelling
Pascal Steenvoorde
Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
Jan H. Wijsman
Moh’d Abu Hilal
Olivier R. Busch
Marc G. Besselink
for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Trials
Minimally invasive
Laparoscopic
Robot-assisted
Distal pancreatectomy
Pancreatic surgery
Pancreatic cancer
author_facet Thijs de Rooij
Jony van Hilst
Jantien A. Vogel
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
Marieke T. de Boer
Djamila Boerma
Peter B. van den Boezem
Bert A. Bonsing
Koop Bosscha
Peter-Paul Coene
Freek Daams
Ronald M. van Dam
Marcel G. Dijkgraaf
Casper H. van Eijck
Sebastiaan Festen
Michael F. Gerhards
Bas Groot Koerkamp
Jeroen Hagendoorn
Erwin van der Harst
Ignace H. de Hingh
Cees H. Dejong
Geert Kazemier
Joost Klaase
Ruben H. de Kleine
Cornelis J. van Laarhoven
Daan J. Lips
Misha D. Luyer
I. Quintus Molenaar
Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs
Gijs A. Patijn
Daphne Roos
Joris J. Scheepers
George P. van der Schelling
Pascal Steenvoorde
Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
Jan H. Wijsman
Moh’d Abu Hilal
Olivier R. Busch
Marc G. Besselink
for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
author_sort Thijs de Rooij
title Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (leopard): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Abstract Background Observational cohort studies have suggested that minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is associated with better short-term outcomes compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP), such as less intraoperative blood loss, lower morbidity, shorter length of hospital stay, and reduced total costs. Confounding by indication has probably influenced these findings, given that case-matched studies failed to confirm the superiority of MIDP. This accentuates the need for multicenter randomized controlled trials, which are currently lacking. We hypothesize that time to functional recovery is shorter after MIDP compared with ODP even in an enhanced recovery setting. Methods LEOPARD is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, patient-blinded, multicenter, superiority trial in all 17 centers of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. A total of 102 patients with symptomatic benign, premalignant or malignant disease will be randomly allocated to undergo MIDP or ODP in an enhanced recovery setting. The primary outcome is time (days) to functional recovery, defined as all of the following: independently mobile at the preoperative level, sufficient pain control with oral medication alone, ability to maintain sufficient (i.e. >50%) daily required caloric intake, no intravenous fluid administration and no signs of infection. Secondary outcomes are operative and postoperative outcomes, including clinically relevant complications, mortality, quality of life and costs. Discussion The LEOPARD trial is designed to investigate whether MIDP reduces the time to functional recovery compared with ODP in an enhanced recovery setting. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register, NTR5188 . Registered on 9 April 2015
topic Minimally invasive
Laparoscopic
Robot-assisted
Distal pancreatectomy
Pancreatic surgery
Pancreatic cancer
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-1892-9
work_keys_str_mv AT thijsderooij minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jonyvanhilst minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jantienavogel minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hjalmarcvansantvoort minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marieketdeboer minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT djamilaboerma minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT peterbvandenboezem minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bertabonsing minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT koopbosscha minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT peterpaulcoene minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT freekdaams minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ronaldmvandam minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marcelgdijkgraaf minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT casperhvaneijck minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sebastiaanfesten minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT michaelfgerhards minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT basgrootkoerkamp minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jeroenhagendoorn minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT erwinvanderharst minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ignacehdehingh minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ceeshdejong minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT geertkazemier minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT joostklaase minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rubenhdekleine minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cornelisjvanlaarhoven minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT daanjlips minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mishadluyer minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT iquintusmolenaar minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vincentbnieuwenhuijs minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gijsapatijn minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT daphneroos minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jorisjscheepers minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT georgepvanderschelling minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pascalsteenvoorde minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rutgerjanswijnenburg minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT janhwijsman minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohdabuhilal minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT olivierrbusch minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marcgbesselink minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT forthedutchpancreaticcancergroup minimallyinvasiveversusopendistalpancreatectomyleopardstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1725849889358741504
spelling doaj-48126af9caf94e8aa02a77e6255894672020-11-24T21:58:59ZengBMCTrials1745-62152017-04-0118111010.1186/s13063-017-1892-9Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trialThijs de Rooij0Jony van Hilst1Jantien A. Vogel2Hjalmar C. van Santvoort3Marieke T. de Boer4Djamila Boerma5Peter B. van den Boezem6Bert A. Bonsing7Koop Bosscha8Peter-Paul Coene9Freek Daams10Ronald M. van Dam11Marcel G. Dijkgraaf12Casper H. van Eijck13Sebastiaan Festen14Michael F. Gerhards15Bas Groot Koerkamp16Jeroen Hagendoorn17Erwin van der Harst18Ignace H. de Hingh19Cees H. Dejong20Geert Kazemier21Joost Klaase22Ruben H. de Kleine23Cornelis J. van Laarhoven24Daan J. Lips25Misha D. Luyer26I. Quintus Molenaar27Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs28Gijs A. Patijn29Daphne Roos30Joris J. Scheepers31George P. van der Schelling32Pascal Steenvoorde33Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg34Jan H. Wijsman35Moh’d Abu Hilal36Olivier R. Busch37Marc G. Besselink38for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer GroupDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius HospitalDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center GroningenDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Maasstad HospitalDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical CenterClinical Research Unit, Academic Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe GasthuisDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe GasthuisDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center UtrechtDepartment of Surgery, Maasstad HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Catharina HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum TwenteDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center GroningenDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Catharina HospitalDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center UtrechtDepartment of Surgery, Isala ClinicsDepartment of Surgery, Isala ClinicsDepartment of Surgery, Reinier de Graag GasthuisDepartment of Surgery, Reinier de Graag GasthuisDepartment of Surgery, Amphia HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum TwenteDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Amphia HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical CenterAbstract Background Observational cohort studies have suggested that minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is associated with better short-term outcomes compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP), such as less intraoperative blood loss, lower morbidity, shorter length of hospital stay, and reduced total costs. Confounding by indication has probably influenced these findings, given that case-matched studies failed to confirm the superiority of MIDP. This accentuates the need for multicenter randomized controlled trials, which are currently lacking. We hypothesize that time to functional recovery is shorter after MIDP compared with ODP even in an enhanced recovery setting. Methods LEOPARD is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, patient-blinded, multicenter, superiority trial in all 17 centers of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. A total of 102 patients with symptomatic benign, premalignant or malignant disease will be randomly allocated to undergo MIDP or ODP in an enhanced recovery setting. The primary outcome is time (days) to functional recovery, defined as all of the following: independently mobile at the preoperative level, sufficient pain control with oral medication alone, ability to maintain sufficient (i.e. >50%) daily required caloric intake, no intravenous fluid administration and no signs of infection. Secondary outcomes are operative and postoperative outcomes, including clinically relevant complications, mortality, quality of life and costs. Discussion The LEOPARD trial is designed to investigate whether MIDP reduces the time to functional recovery compared with ODP in an enhanced recovery setting. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register, NTR5188 . Registered on 9 April 2015http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-1892-9Minimally invasiveLaparoscopicRobot-assistedDistal pancreatectomyPancreatic surgeryPancreatic cancer