STUDENT-WRITERS’ CLAIMS IN HORTATORY ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS: AN APPRAISAL STUDY IN CONVENIENCE WRITING

Working on writing argumentative essay instructions has been practices in a non-formal language learning settings. Yet, its students’ pursued claims are not fully explored as an evaluativion of how student-writers interact as conveying arguments with the readers. Investigating the linguistic resourc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marwito Wihadi, Eva Tuckyta Sari Sujatna, Ypsi Soeriasoemantri, Eni Karlieni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Sanata Dharma 2018-10-01
Series:LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching
Subjects:
Online Access:http://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT/article/view/938
id doaj-484719a66f9d42da9d9453aef01e6d2e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-484719a66f9d42da9d9453aef01e6d2e2020-11-25T00:50:07ZengUniversitas Sanata DharmaLLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching1410-72012579-95332018-10-012121691741261STUDENT-WRITERS’ CLAIMS IN HORTATORY ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS: AN APPRAISAL STUDY IN CONVENIENCE WRITINGMarwito Wihadi0Eva Tuckyta Sari Sujatna1Ypsi Soeriasoemantri2Eni Karlieni3Padjadjaran UniversityPadjadjaran UniversityPadjadjaran UniversityPadjadjaran UniversityWorking on writing argumentative essay instructions has been practices in a non-formal language learning settings. Yet, its students’ pursued claims are not fully explored as an evaluativion of how student-writers interact as conveying arguments with the readers. Investigating the linguistic resources on which they develop and evaluate these, two selected English Language essays were looked into regarding to exploitation of macrostructures in them. Subsequently, they were captured within the framework of appraisal theory as to emerge various trends relative to the employment of engagement resource types, combined with the other resources in confirming claims: graduation and attitudinal ones. It was pinpointed that the essays were low-graded notifying substantial numbers of monoglossic resources with low-considered attitudinal items. They failed to recognise other voices and alternative positions. Their construction of evaluative meanings provided feedbacks, enhancing classroom teachers’ awareness of typical features in genre-based instructions. DOI: doi.org/10.24071/llt.2018.210205http://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT/article/view/938argumentative, hortatory, essays, appraisal theory, low-graded
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marwito Wihadi
Eva Tuckyta Sari Sujatna
Ypsi Soeriasoemantri
Eni Karlieni
spellingShingle Marwito Wihadi
Eva Tuckyta Sari Sujatna
Ypsi Soeriasoemantri
Eni Karlieni
STUDENT-WRITERS’ CLAIMS IN HORTATORY ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS: AN APPRAISAL STUDY IN CONVENIENCE WRITING
LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching
argumentative, hortatory, essays, appraisal theory, low-graded
author_facet Marwito Wihadi
Eva Tuckyta Sari Sujatna
Ypsi Soeriasoemantri
Eni Karlieni
author_sort Marwito Wihadi
title STUDENT-WRITERS’ CLAIMS IN HORTATORY ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS: AN APPRAISAL STUDY IN CONVENIENCE WRITING
title_short STUDENT-WRITERS’ CLAIMS IN HORTATORY ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS: AN APPRAISAL STUDY IN CONVENIENCE WRITING
title_full STUDENT-WRITERS’ CLAIMS IN HORTATORY ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS: AN APPRAISAL STUDY IN CONVENIENCE WRITING
title_fullStr STUDENT-WRITERS’ CLAIMS IN HORTATORY ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS: AN APPRAISAL STUDY IN CONVENIENCE WRITING
title_full_unstemmed STUDENT-WRITERS’ CLAIMS IN HORTATORY ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS: AN APPRAISAL STUDY IN CONVENIENCE WRITING
title_sort student-writers’ claims in hortatory argumentative essays: an appraisal study in convenience writing
publisher Universitas Sanata Dharma
series LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching
issn 1410-7201
2579-9533
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Working on writing argumentative essay instructions has been practices in a non-formal language learning settings. Yet, its students’ pursued claims are not fully explored as an evaluativion of how student-writers interact as conveying arguments with the readers. Investigating the linguistic resources on which they develop and evaluate these, two selected English Language essays were looked into regarding to exploitation of macrostructures in them. Subsequently, they were captured within the framework of appraisal theory as to emerge various trends relative to the employment of engagement resource types, combined with the other resources in confirming claims: graduation and attitudinal ones. It was pinpointed that the essays were low-graded notifying substantial numbers of monoglossic resources with low-considered attitudinal items. They failed to recognise other voices and alternative positions. Their construction of evaluative meanings provided feedbacks, enhancing classroom teachers’ awareness of typical features in genre-based instructions. DOI: doi.org/10.24071/llt.2018.210205
topic argumentative, hortatory, essays, appraisal theory, low-graded
url http://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT/article/view/938
work_keys_str_mv AT marwitowihadi studentwritersclaimsinhortatoryargumentativeessaysanappraisalstudyinconveniencewriting
AT evatuckytasarisujatna studentwritersclaimsinhortatoryargumentativeessaysanappraisalstudyinconveniencewriting
AT ypsisoeriasoemantri studentwritersclaimsinhortatoryargumentativeessaysanappraisalstudyinconveniencewriting
AT enikarlieni studentwritersclaimsinhortatoryargumentativeessaysanappraisalstudyinconveniencewriting
_version_ 1725249289694740480