Performance and comparison of assessment models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia

Abstract. Background. Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is the most common hospital-acquired infection in China with substantial morbidity and mortality. But no specific risk assessment model has been well validated in patients with HAP. The aim of this study was to investigate the published risk as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jia-Ning Wen, Nan Li, Chen-Xia Guo, Ning Shen, Bei He, Pei-Fang Wei.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2020-12-01
Series:Chinese Medical Journal
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001252
id doaj-484bed00a4504bf891556d98acb8d3d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-484bed00a4504bf891556d98acb8d3d92020-12-23T08:13:56ZengWolters KluwerChinese Medical Journal0366-69992542-56412020-12-01133242947295210.1097/CM9.0000000000001252202012200-00008Performance and comparison of assessment models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with hospital-acquired pneumoniaJia-Ning WenNan LiChen-Xia GuoNing ShenBei HePei-Fang Wei.Abstract. Background. Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is the most common hospital-acquired infection in China with substantial morbidity and mortality. But no specific risk assessment model has been well validated in patients with HAP. The aim of this study was to investigate the published risk assessment models that could potentially be used to predict 30-day mortality in HAP patients in non-surgical departments. Methods. This study was a single-center, retrospective study. In total, 223 patients diagnosed with HAP from 2012 to 2017 were included in this study. Clinical and laboratory data during the initial 24 hours after HAP diagnosis were collected to calculate the pneumonia severity index (PSI); consciousness, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥65 years (CURB-65); Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II); Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA); and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores. The discriminatory power was tested by constructing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated. Results. The all-cause 30-day mortality rate was 18.4% (41/223). The PSI, CURB-65, SOFA, APACHE II, and qSOFA scores were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (all P < 0.001). The discriminatory abilities of the APACHE II and SOFA scores were better than those of the CURB-65 and qSOFA scores (ROC AUC: APACHE II vs. CURB-65, 0.863 vs. 0.744, Z = 3.055, P = 0.002; APACHE II vs. qSOFA, 0.863 vs. 0.767, Z = 3.017, P = 0.003; SOFA vs. CURB-65, 0.856 vs. 0.744, Z = 2.589, P = 0.010; SOFA vs. qSOFA, 0.856 vs. 0.767, Z = 2.170, P = 0.030). The cut-off values we defined for the SOFA, APACHE II, and qSOFA scores were 4, 14, and 1. Conclusions. These results suggest that the APACHE II and SOFA scores determined during the initial 24 h after HAP diagnosis may be useful for the prediction of 30-day mortality in HAP patients in non-surgical departments. The qSOFA score may be a simple tool that can be used to quickly identify severe infections.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001252
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jia-Ning Wen
Nan Li
Chen-Xia Guo
Ning Shen
Bei He
Pei-Fang Wei.
spellingShingle Jia-Ning Wen
Nan Li
Chen-Xia Guo
Ning Shen
Bei He
Pei-Fang Wei.
Performance and comparison of assessment models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia
Chinese Medical Journal
author_facet Jia-Ning Wen
Nan Li
Chen-Xia Guo
Ning Shen
Bei He
Pei-Fang Wei.
author_sort Jia-Ning Wen
title Performance and comparison of assessment models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia
title_short Performance and comparison of assessment models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia
title_full Performance and comparison of assessment models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia
title_fullStr Performance and comparison of assessment models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Performance and comparison of assessment models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia
title_sort performance and comparison of assessment models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Chinese Medical Journal
issn 0366-6999
2542-5641
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Abstract. Background. Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is the most common hospital-acquired infection in China with substantial morbidity and mortality. But no specific risk assessment model has been well validated in patients with HAP. The aim of this study was to investigate the published risk assessment models that could potentially be used to predict 30-day mortality in HAP patients in non-surgical departments. Methods. This study was a single-center, retrospective study. In total, 223 patients diagnosed with HAP from 2012 to 2017 were included in this study. Clinical and laboratory data during the initial 24 hours after HAP diagnosis were collected to calculate the pneumonia severity index (PSI); consciousness, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥65 years (CURB-65); Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II); Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA); and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores. The discriminatory power was tested by constructing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated. Results. The all-cause 30-day mortality rate was 18.4% (41/223). The PSI, CURB-65, SOFA, APACHE II, and qSOFA scores were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (all P < 0.001). The discriminatory abilities of the APACHE II and SOFA scores were better than those of the CURB-65 and qSOFA scores (ROC AUC: APACHE II vs. CURB-65, 0.863 vs. 0.744, Z = 3.055, P = 0.002; APACHE II vs. qSOFA, 0.863 vs. 0.767, Z = 3.017, P = 0.003; SOFA vs. CURB-65, 0.856 vs. 0.744, Z = 2.589, P = 0.010; SOFA vs. qSOFA, 0.856 vs. 0.767, Z = 2.170, P = 0.030). The cut-off values we defined for the SOFA, APACHE II, and qSOFA scores were 4, 14, and 1. Conclusions. These results suggest that the APACHE II and SOFA scores determined during the initial 24 h after HAP diagnosis may be useful for the prediction of 30-day mortality in HAP patients in non-surgical departments. The qSOFA score may be a simple tool that can be used to quickly identify severe infections.
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001252
work_keys_str_mv AT jianingwen performanceandcomparisonofassessmentmodelstopredict30daymortalityinpatientswithhospitalacquiredpneumonia
AT nanli performanceandcomparisonofassessmentmodelstopredict30daymortalityinpatientswithhospitalacquiredpneumonia
AT chenxiaguo performanceandcomparisonofassessmentmodelstopredict30daymortalityinpatientswithhospitalacquiredpneumonia
AT ningshen performanceandcomparisonofassessmentmodelstopredict30daymortalityinpatientswithhospitalacquiredpneumonia
AT beihe performanceandcomparisonofassessmentmodelstopredict30daymortalityinpatientswithhospitalacquiredpneumonia
AT peifangwei performanceandcomparisonofassessmentmodelstopredict30daymortalityinpatientswithhospitalacquiredpneumonia
_version_ 1724372886651666432