Comparison of one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda: a finite element analysis

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to compare the stress distribution and displacement patterns of the one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda and to evaluate the biomechanical effect of distalization on the iPanda using the finite element method. Methods The finite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kamontip Sujaritwanid, Boonsiva Suzuki, Eduardo Yugo Suzuki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-05-01
Series:Progress in Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00356-6
id doaj-486c6093417345ed97a57f50ec450d04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-486c6093417345ed97a57f50ec450d042021-05-09T11:03:17ZengSpringerOpenProgress in Orthodontics2196-10422021-05-0122111010.1186/s40510-021-00356-6Comparison of one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda: a finite element analysisKamontip Sujaritwanid0Boonsiva Suzuki1Eduardo Yugo Suzuki2Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bangkokthonburi UniversityDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bangkokthonburi UniversityDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bangkokthonburi UniversityAbstract Background The purpose of this study was to compare the stress distribution and displacement patterns of the one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda and to evaluate the biomechanical effect of distalization on the iPanda using the finite element method. Methods The finite element models of a maxillary arch with complete dentition, periodontal ligament, palatal and alveolar bone, and an iPanda connected to a pair of midpalatal miniscrews were created. Two models were created to simulate maxillary molar distalization. In the first model, the iPanda was connected to the second molar to simulate a single molar distalization. In the second model, the iPanda was connected to the first molar to simulate “en-masse” first and second molar distalization. A varying force from 50 to 200 g was applied. The stress distribution and displacement patterns were analyzed. Results For one molar, the stress was concentrated at the furcation and along the distal surface in all roots with a large amount of distalization and distobuccal crown tipping. For two molars, the stress in the first molar was 10 times higher than in the second molar with a great tendency for buccal tipping and a minimal amount of distalization. Moreover, the stress concentration on the distal miniscrew was six times higher than in the mesial miniscrew with an extrusive and intrusive vector, respectively. Conclusions Individual molar distalization provides the most effective stress distribution and displacement patterns with reduced force levels. In contrast, the en-masse distalization of two molars results in increased force levels with undesirable effects in the transverse and vertical direction.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00356-6Class II malocclusionFinite element methodMaxillary molar distalizationMiniscrew
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kamontip Sujaritwanid
Boonsiva Suzuki
Eduardo Yugo Suzuki
spellingShingle Kamontip Sujaritwanid
Boonsiva Suzuki
Eduardo Yugo Suzuki
Comparison of one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda: a finite element analysis
Progress in Orthodontics
Class II malocclusion
Finite element method
Maxillary molar distalization
Miniscrew
author_facet Kamontip Sujaritwanid
Boonsiva Suzuki
Eduardo Yugo Suzuki
author_sort Kamontip Sujaritwanid
title Comparison of one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda: a finite element analysis
title_short Comparison of one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda: a finite element analysis
title_full Comparison of one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda: a finite element analysis
title_sort comparison of one versus two maxillary molars distalization with ipanda: a finite element analysis
publisher SpringerOpen
series Progress in Orthodontics
issn 2196-1042
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to compare the stress distribution and displacement patterns of the one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda and to evaluate the biomechanical effect of distalization on the iPanda using the finite element method. Methods The finite element models of a maxillary arch with complete dentition, periodontal ligament, palatal and alveolar bone, and an iPanda connected to a pair of midpalatal miniscrews were created. Two models were created to simulate maxillary molar distalization. In the first model, the iPanda was connected to the second molar to simulate a single molar distalization. In the second model, the iPanda was connected to the first molar to simulate “en-masse” first and second molar distalization. A varying force from 50 to 200 g was applied. The stress distribution and displacement patterns were analyzed. Results For one molar, the stress was concentrated at the furcation and along the distal surface in all roots with a large amount of distalization and distobuccal crown tipping. For two molars, the stress in the first molar was 10 times higher than in the second molar with a great tendency for buccal tipping and a minimal amount of distalization. Moreover, the stress concentration on the distal miniscrew was six times higher than in the mesial miniscrew with an extrusive and intrusive vector, respectively. Conclusions Individual molar distalization provides the most effective stress distribution and displacement patterns with reduced force levels. In contrast, the en-masse distalization of two molars results in increased force levels with undesirable effects in the transverse and vertical direction.
topic Class II malocclusion
Finite element method
Maxillary molar distalization
Miniscrew
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00356-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kamontipsujaritwanid comparisonofoneversustwomaxillarymolarsdistalizationwithipandaafiniteelementanalysis
AT boonsivasuzuki comparisonofoneversustwomaxillarymolarsdistalizationwithipandaafiniteelementanalysis
AT eduardoyugosuzuki comparisonofoneversustwomaxillarymolarsdistalizationwithipandaafiniteelementanalysis
_version_ 1721454696721285120