Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution

We set up a formalism for calculating transverse-momentum-dependent parton distribution functions (TMDs) of a large nucleus using the tools of saturation physics. By generalizing the quasi-classical Glauber–Gribov–Mueller/McLerran–Venugopalan approximation to allow for the possibility of spin–orbit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuri V. Kovchegov, Matthew D. Sievert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-02-01
Series:Nuclear Physics B
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321315004289
id doaj-48703d01ad6b44c3b5b4236155912385
record_format Article
spelling doaj-48703d01ad6b44c3b5b42361559123852020-11-24T22:24:05ZengElsevierNuclear Physics B0550-32131873-15622016-02-01903C16420310.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.12.008Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolutionYuri V. Kovchegov0Matthew D. Sievert1Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USABldg. 510A, Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USAWe set up a formalism for calculating transverse-momentum-dependent parton distribution functions (TMDs) of a large nucleus using the tools of saturation physics. By generalizing the quasi-classical Glauber–Gribov–Mueller/McLerran–Venugopalan approximation to allow for the possibility of spin–orbit coupling, we show how any TMD can be calculated in the saturation framework. This can also be applied to the TMDs of a proton by modeling it as a large “nucleus.” To illustrate our technique, we calculate the quark TMDs of an unpolarized nucleus at large-x: the unpolarized quark distribution and the quark Boer–Mulders distribution. We observe that spin–orbit coupling leads to mixing between different TMDs of the nucleus and of the nucleons. We then consider the evolution of TMDs: at large-x, in the double-logarithmic approximation, we obtain the Sudakov form factor. At small-x the evolution of unpolarized-target quark TMDs is governed by BK/JIMWLK evolution, while the small-x evolution of polarized-target quark TMDs appears to be dominated by the QCD Reggeon.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321315004289
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yuri V. Kovchegov
Matthew D. Sievert
spellingShingle Yuri V. Kovchegov
Matthew D. Sievert
Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution
Nuclear Physics B
author_facet Yuri V. Kovchegov
Matthew D. Sievert
author_sort Yuri V. Kovchegov
title Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution
title_short Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution
title_full Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution
title_fullStr Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution
title_full_unstemmed Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution
title_sort calculating tmds of a large nucleus: quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution
publisher Elsevier
series Nuclear Physics B
issn 0550-3213
1873-1562
publishDate 2016-02-01
description We set up a formalism for calculating transverse-momentum-dependent parton distribution functions (TMDs) of a large nucleus using the tools of saturation physics. By generalizing the quasi-classical Glauber–Gribov–Mueller/McLerran–Venugopalan approximation to allow for the possibility of spin–orbit coupling, we show how any TMD can be calculated in the saturation framework. This can also be applied to the TMDs of a proton by modeling it as a large “nucleus.” To illustrate our technique, we calculate the quark TMDs of an unpolarized nucleus at large-x: the unpolarized quark distribution and the quark Boer–Mulders distribution. We observe that spin–orbit coupling leads to mixing between different TMDs of the nucleus and of the nucleons. We then consider the evolution of TMDs: at large-x, in the double-logarithmic approximation, we obtain the Sudakov form factor. At small-x the evolution of unpolarized-target quark TMDs is governed by BK/JIMWLK evolution, while the small-x evolution of polarized-target quark TMDs appears to be dominated by the QCD Reggeon.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321315004289
work_keys_str_mv AT yurivkovchegov calculatingtmdsofalargenucleusquasiclassicalapproximationandquantumevolution
AT matthewdsievert calculatingtmdsofalargenucleusquasiclassicalapproximationandquantumevolution
_version_ 1725762388706197504