Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution
We set up a formalism for calculating transverse-momentum-dependent parton distribution functions (TMDs) of a large nucleus using the tools of saturation physics. By generalizing the quasi-classical Glauber–Gribov–Mueller/McLerran–Venugopalan approximation to allow for the possibility of spin–orbit...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2016-02-01
|
Series: | Nuclear Physics B |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321315004289 |
id |
doaj-48703d01ad6b44c3b5b4236155912385 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-48703d01ad6b44c3b5b42361559123852020-11-24T22:24:05ZengElsevierNuclear Physics B0550-32131873-15622016-02-01903C16420310.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.12.008Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolutionYuri V. Kovchegov0Matthew D. Sievert1Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USABldg. 510A, Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USAWe set up a formalism for calculating transverse-momentum-dependent parton distribution functions (TMDs) of a large nucleus using the tools of saturation physics. By generalizing the quasi-classical Glauber–Gribov–Mueller/McLerran–Venugopalan approximation to allow for the possibility of spin–orbit coupling, we show how any TMD can be calculated in the saturation framework. This can also be applied to the TMDs of a proton by modeling it as a large “nucleus.” To illustrate our technique, we calculate the quark TMDs of an unpolarized nucleus at large-x: the unpolarized quark distribution and the quark Boer–Mulders distribution. We observe that spin–orbit coupling leads to mixing between different TMDs of the nucleus and of the nucleons. We then consider the evolution of TMDs: at large-x, in the double-logarithmic approximation, we obtain the Sudakov form factor. At small-x the evolution of unpolarized-target quark TMDs is governed by BK/JIMWLK evolution, while the small-x evolution of polarized-target quark TMDs appears to be dominated by the QCD Reggeon.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321315004289 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yuri V. Kovchegov Matthew D. Sievert |
spellingShingle |
Yuri V. Kovchegov Matthew D. Sievert Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution Nuclear Physics B |
author_facet |
Yuri V. Kovchegov Matthew D. Sievert |
author_sort |
Yuri V. Kovchegov |
title |
Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution |
title_short |
Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution |
title_full |
Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution |
title_fullStr |
Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution |
title_full_unstemmed |
Calculating TMDs of a large nucleus: Quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution |
title_sort |
calculating tmds of a large nucleus: quasi-classical approximation and quantum evolution |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Nuclear Physics B |
issn |
0550-3213 1873-1562 |
publishDate |
2016-02-01 |
description |
We set up a formalism for calculating transverse-momentum-dependent parton distribution functions (TMDs) of a large nucleus using the tools of saturation physics. By generalizing the quasi-classical Glauber–Gribov–Mueller/McLerran–Venugopalan approximation to allow for the possibility of spin–orbit coupling, we show how any TMD can be calculated in the saturation framework. This can also be applied to the TMDs of a proton by modeling it as a large “nucleus.” To illustrate our technique, we calculate the quark TMDs of an unpolarized nucleus at large-x: the unpolarized quark distribution and the quark Boer–Mulders distribution. We observe that spin–orbit coupling leads to mixing between different TMDs of the nucleus and of the nucleons. We then consider the evolution of TMDs: at large-x, in the double-logarithmic approximation, we obtain the Sudakov form factor. At small-x the evolution of unpolarized-target quark TMDs is governed by BK/JIMWLK evolution, while the small-x evolution of polarized-target quark TMDs appears to be dominated by the QCD Reggeon. |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321315004289 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yurivkovchegov calculatingtmdsofalargenucleusquasiclassicalapproximationandquantumevolution AT matthewdsievert calculatingtmdsofalargenucleusquasiclassicalapproximationandquantumevolution |
_version_ |
1725762388706197504 |