Multi-stakeholder initiatives in sustainable supply chains: Putting sustainability performance in context

The purpose of this article is to explore the role of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) in sustainable supply chains. I argue that MSIs are needed to help establish and institutionalize the natural and social thresholds in which a sustainable supply chain must operate. While a multitude of MSIs r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cory Searcy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioOne 2017-12-01
Series:Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.elementascience.org/articles/262
id doaj-48f046dacf00459885cf6a486f2602e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-48f046dacf00459885cf6a486f2602e22020-11-25T01:47:19ZengBioOneElementa: Science of the Anthropocene2325-10262017-12-01510.1525/elementa.262215Multi-stakeholder initiatives in sustainable supply chains: Putting sustainability performance in contextCory Searcy0Ryerson University, Toronto, OntarioThe purpose of this article is to explore the role of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) in sustainable supply chains. I argue that MSIs are needed to help establish and institutionalize the natural and social thresholds in which a sustainable supply chain must operate. While a multitude of MSIs relevant to supply chains already exist, they do not yet adequately address sustainability thresholds. Building on theory and literature, I elaborate on four interrelated roles for MSIs in this area: (1) providing learning platforms, (2) developing standards, (3) developing enforcement mechanisms, and (4) issuing labels and certifications. All four roles emphasize the need for supply chains to operate within the thresholds set by nature and society. Staying within thresholds is what distinguishes between sustainable and unsustainable supply chains. The four roles form part of a broader conceptual framework outlining a way forward for MSIs in sustainable supply chains. Different MSIs could address one or more of these roles. I argue that all MSIs must be developed with special attention to their input and output legitimacy. Stakeholders from both within and beyond the supply chain must be involved in developing and implementing a MSI for it to be viewed as legitimate. I note that the conceptual framework presented here is a starting point. It would benefit from further testing and refinement. For example, future work could add further specificity to the four roles I discuss. Future research could also focus on integrating economic thresholds for sustainable supply chains into the framework.https://www.elementascience.org/articles/262sustainable supply chainsmulti-stakeholder initiativessustainability performancesustainability contextthresholds
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cory Searcy
spellingShingle Cory Searcy
Multi-stakeholder initiatives in sustainable supply chains: Putting sustainability performance in context
Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
sustainable supply chains
multi-stakeholder initiatives
sustainability performance
sustainability context
thresholds
author_facet Cory Searcy
author_sort Cory Searcy
title Multi-stakeholder initiatives in sustainable supply chains: Putting sustainability performance in context
title_short Multi-stakeholder initiatives in sustainable supply chains: Putting sustainability performance in context
title_full Multi-stakeholder initiatives in sustainable supply chains: Putting sustainability performance in context
title_fullStr Multi-stakeholder initiatives in sustainable supply chains: Putting sustainability performance in context
title_full_unstemmed Multi-stakeholder initiatives in sustainable supply chains: Putting sustainability performance in context
title_sort multi-stakeholder initiatives in sustainable supply chains: putting sustainability performance in context
publisher BioOne
series Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
issn 2325-1026
publishDate 2017-12-01
description The purpose of this article is to explore the role of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) in sustainable supply chains. I argue that MSIs are needed to help establish and institutionalize the natural and social thresholds in which a sustainable supply chain must operate. While a multitude of MSIs relevant to supply chains already exist, they do not yet adequately address sustainability thresholds. Building on theory and literature, I elaborate on four interrelated roles for MSIs in this area: (1) providing learning platforms, (2) developing standards, (3) developing enforcement mechanisms, and (4) issuing labels and certifications. All four roles emphasize the need for supply chains to operate within the thresholds set by nature and society. Staying within thresholds is what distinguishes between sustainable and unsustainable supply chains. The four roles form part of a broader conceptual framework outlining a way forward for MSIs in sustainable supply chains. Different MSIs could address one or more of these roles. I argue that all MSIs must be developed with special attention to their input and output legitimacy. Stakeholders from both within and beyond the supply chain must be involved in developing and implementing a MSI for it to be viewed as legitimate. I note that the conceptual framework presented here is a starting point. It would benefit from further testing and refinement. For example, future work could add further specificity to the four roles I discuss. Future research could also focus on integrating economic thresholds for sustainable supply chains into the framework.
topic sustainable supply chains
multi-stakeholder initiatives
sustainability performance
sustainability context
thresholds
url https://www.elementascience.org/articles/262
work_keys_str_mv AT corysearcy multistakeholderinitiativesinsustainablesupplychainsputtingsustainabilityperformanceincontext
_version_ 1725014937262096384