Does truth matter to voters? The effects of correcting political misinformation in an Australian sample
In the ‘post-truth era’, political fact-checking has become an issue of considerable significance. A recent study in the context of the 2016 US election found that fact-checks of statements by Donald Trump changed participants' beliefs about those statements—regardless of whether participants s...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Royal Society
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.180593 |
id |
doaj-497317ddffb54854aa235bd2cf25a4cd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-497317ddffb54854aa235bd2cf25a4cd2020-11-25T03:41:03ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032018-01-0151210.1098/rsos.180593180593Does truth matter to voters? The effects of correcting political misinformation in an Australian sampleMichael J. AirdUllrich K. H. EckerBriony SwireAdam J. BerinskyStephan LewandowskyIn the ‘post-truth era’, political fact-checking has become an issue of considerable significance. A recent study in the context of the 2016 US election found that fact-checks of statements by Donald Trump changed participants' beliefs about those statements—regardless of whether participants supported Trump—but not their feelings towards Trump or voting intentions. However, the study balanced corrections of inaccurate statements with an equal number of affirmations of accurate statements. Therefore, the null effect of fact-checks on participants’ voting intentions and feelings may have arisen because of this artificially created balance. Moreover, Trump's statements were not contrasted with statements from an opposing politician, and Trump's perceived veracity was not measured. The present study (N = 370) examined the issue further, manipulating the ratio of corrections to affirmations, and using Australian politicians (and Australian participants) from both sides of the political spectrum. We hypothesized that fact-checks would correct beliefs and that fact-checks would affect voters’ support (i.e. voting intentions, feelings and perceptions of veracity), but only when corrections outnumbered affirmations. Both hypotheses were supported, suggesting that a politician's veracity does sometimes matter to voters. The effects of fact-checking were similar on both sides of the political spectrum, suggesting little motivated reasoning in the processing of fact-checks.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.180593misinformationfact-checkingpolitical attitudesbelief changevoting behaviourmisconceptions |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michael J. Aird Ullrich K. H. Ecker Briony Swire Adam J. Berinsky Stephan Lewandowsky |
spellingShingle |
Michael J. Aird Ullrich K. H. Ecker Briony Swire Adam J. Berinsky Stephan Lewandowsky Does truth matter to voters? The effects of correcting political misinformation in an Australian sample Royal Society Open Science misinformation fact-checking political attitudes belief change voting behaviour misconceptions |
author_facet |
Michael J. Aird Ullrich K. H. Ecker Briony Swire Adam J. Berinsky Stephan Lewandowsky |
author_sort |
Michael J. Aird |
title |
Does truth matter to voters? The effects of correcting political misinformation in an Australian sample |
title_short |
Does truth matter to voters? The effects of correcting political misinformation in an Australian sample |
title_full |
Does truth matter to voters? The effects of correcting political misinformation in an Australian sample |
title_fullStr |
Does truth matter to voters? The effects of correcting political misinformation in an Australian sample |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does truth matter to voters? The effects of correcting political misinformation in an Australian sample |
title_sort |
does truth matter to voters? the effects of correcting political misinformation in an australian sample |
publisher |
The Royal Society |
series |
Royal Society Open Science |
issn |
2054-5703 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
In the ‘post-truth era’, political fact-checking has become an issue of considerable significance. A recent study in the context of the 2016 US election found that fact-checks of statements by Donald Trump changed participants' beliefs about those statements—regardless of whether participants supported Trump—but not their feelings towards Trump or voting intentions. However, the study balanced corrections of inaccurate statements with an equal number of affirmations of accurate statements. Therefore, the null effect of fact-checks on participants’ voting intentions and feelings may have arisen because of this artificially created balance. Moreover, Trump's statements were not contrasted with statements from an opposing politician, and Trump's perceived veracity was not measured. The present study (N = 370) examined the issue further, manipulating the ratio of corrections to affirmations, and using Australian politicians (and Australian participants) from both sides of the political spectrum. We hypothesized that fact-checks would correct beliefs and that fact-checks would affect voters’ support (i.e. voting intentions, feelings and perceptions of veracity), but only when corrections outnumbered affirmations. Both hypotheses were supported, suggesting that a politician's veracity does sometimes matter to voters. The effects of fact-checking were similar on both sides of the political spectrum, suggesting little motivated reasoning in the processing of fact-checks. |
topic |
misinformation fact-checking political attitudes belief change voting behaviour misconceptions |
url |
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.180593 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaeljaird doestruthmattertovoterstheeffectsofcorrectingpoliticalmisinformationinanaustraliansample AT ullrichkhecker doestruthmattertovoterstheeffectsofcorrectingpoliticalmisinformationinanaustraliansample AT brionyswire doestruthmattertovoterstheeffectsofcorrectingpoliticalmisinformationinanaustraliansample AT adamjberinsky doestruthmattertovoterstheeffectsofcorrectingpoliticalmisinformationinanaustraliansample AT stephanlewandowsky doestruthmattertovoterstheeffectsofcorrectingpoliticalmisinformationinanaustraliansample |
_version_ |
1724532075737907200 |