Dwelling on a Successful Task

Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) has been identified as a key maintaining process of emotional difficulties. However, the consequences of repetitive thinking may depend on whether negative thoughts or feelings are processed in an abstract, evaluative mode, or in a concrete, process-focused mode. I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ida K. Flink, Madelon L. Peters, Sofia Bergbom, Marie Bergman, Karin Ekstrand, Johan K.P. Carstens, Maria Tillfors
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-07-01
Series:Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.047915
id doaj-49af3f6008b34c129fcf63576fe2c513
record_format Article
spelling doaj-49af3f6008b34c129fcf63576fe2c5132020-11-25T03:52:34ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Experimental Psychopathology2043-80872018-07-01910.5127/jep.047915Dwelling on a Successful TaskIda K. FlinkMadelon L. PetersSofia BergbomMarie BergmanKarin EkstrandJohan K.P. CarstensMaria TillforsRepetitive negative thinking (RNT) has been identified as a key maintaining process of emotional difficulties. However, the consequences of repetitive thinking may depend on whether negative thoughts or feelings are processed in an abstract, evaluative mode, or in a concrete, process-focused mode. In recent years an increasing number of studies has also explored the effect of processing mode in relation to positive events, yielding inconsistent results. So far, the studies using positive material have not examined the interaction between trait rumination and processing mode. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to further explore the effects of abstract vs. concrete mode of processing on positive affect and negative affect in the context of a success task in a sample scoring high on trait rumination. 62 participants were randomly assigned to abstract vs. concrete processing training prior to a success task. The results showed that positive affect increased whereas negative affect and state RNT decreased after the success task in both groups. However, abstract vs. concrete processing did not have an effect on outcome. The findings indicate that processing mode does not influence outcome in the context of a success task.https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.047915
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ida K. Flink
Madelon L. Peters
Sofia Bergbom
Marie Bergman
Karin Ekstrand
Johan K.P. Carstens
Maria Tillfors
spellingShingle Ida K. Flink
Madelon L. Peters
Sofia Bergbom
Marie Bergman
Karin Ekstrand
Johan K.P. Carstens
Maria Tillfors
Dwelling on a Successful Task
Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
author_facet Ida K. Flink
Madelon L. Peters
Sofia Bergbom
Marie Bergman
Karin Ekstrand
Johan K.P. Carstens
Maria Tillfors
author_sort Ida K. Flink
title Dwelling on a Successful Task
title_short Dwelling on a Successful Task
title_full Dwelling on a Successful Task
title_fullStr Dwelling on a Successful Task
title_full_unstemmed Dwelling on a Successful Task
title_sort dwelling on a successful task
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
issn 2043-8087
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) has been identified as a key maintaining process of emotional difficulties. However, the consequences of repetitive thinking may depend on whether negative thoughts or feelings are processed in an abstract, evaluative mode, or in a concrete, process-focused mode. In recent years an increasing number of studies has also explored the effect of processing mode in relation to positive events, yielding inconsistent results. So far, the studies using positive material have not examined the interaction between trait rumination and processing mode. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to further explore the effects of abstract vs. concrete mode of processing on positive affect and negative affect in the context of a success task in a sample scoring high on trait rumination. 62 participants were randomly assigned to abstract vs. concrete processing training prior to a success task. The results showed that positive affect increased whereas negative affect and state RNT decreased after the success task in both groups. However, abstract vs. concrete processing did not have an effect on outcome. The findings indicate that processing mode does not influence outcome in the context of a success task.
url https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.047915
work_keys_str_mv AT idakflink dwellingonasuccessfultask
AT madelonlpeters dwellingonasuccessfultask
AT sofiabergbom dwellingonasuccessfultask
AT mariebergman dwellingonasuccessfultask
AT karinekstrand dwellingonasuccessfultask
AT johankpcarstens dwellingonasuccessfultask
AT mariatillfors dwellingonasuccessfultask
_version_ 1724482125298663424