Mathematical Analysis of Glioma Growth in a Murine Model

Abstract Five immunocompetent C57BL/6-cBrd/cBrd/Cr (albino C57BL/6) mice were injected with GL261-luc2 cells, a cell line sharing characteristics of human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The mice were imaged using magnetic resonance (MR) at five separate time points to characterize growth and develop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erica M. Rutter, Tracy L. Stepien, Barrett J. Anderies, Jonathan D. Plasencia, Eric C. Woolf, Adrienne C. Scheck, Gregory H. Turner, Qingwei Liu, David Frakes, Vikram Kodibagkar, Yang Kuang, Mark C. Preul, Eric J. Kostelich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2017-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02462-0
id doaj-49c26a5cb0574efa92425851a3c1b035
record_format Article
spelling doaj-49c26a5cb0574efa92425851a3c1b0352020-12-08T01:43:05ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222017-05-017111610.1038/s41598-017-02462-0Mathematical Analysis of Glioma Growth in a Murine ModelErica M. Rutter0Tracy L. Stepien1Barrett J. Anderies2Jonathan D. Plasencia3Eric C. Woolf4Adrienne C. Scheck5Gregory H. Turner6Qingwei Liu7David Frakes8Vikram Kodibagkar9Yang Kuang10Mark C. Preul11Eric J. Kostelich12School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State UniversityBNI-ASU Center for Preclinical Imaging, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical CenterBNI-ASU Center for Preclinical Imaging, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical CenterSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State UniversityDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Research Lab, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical CenterSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State UniversityAbstract Five immunocompetent C57BL/6-cBrd/cBrd/Cr (albino C57BL/6) mice were injected with GL261-luc2 cells, a cell line sharing characteristics of human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The mice were imaged using magnetic resonance (MR) at five separate time points to characterize growth and development of the tumor. After 25 days, the final tumor volumes of the mice varied from 12 mm3 to 62 mm3, even though mice were inoculated from the same tumor cell line under carefully controlled conditions. We generated hypotheses to explore large variances in final tumor size and tested them with our simple reaction-diffusion model in both a 3-dimensional (3D) finite difference method and a 2-dimensional (2D) level set method. The parameters obtained from a best-fit procedure, designed to yield simulated tumors as close as possible to the observed ones, vary by an order of magnitude between the three mice analyzed in detail. These differences may reflect morphological and biological variability in tumor growth, as well as errors in the mathematical model, perhaps from an oversimplification of the tumor dynamics or nonidentifiability of parameters. Our results generate parameters that match other experimental in vitro and in vivo measurements. Additionally, we calculate wave speed, which matches with other rat and human measurements.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02462-0
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erica M. Rutter
Tracy L. Stepien
Barrett J. Anderies
Jonathan D. Plasencia
Eric C. Woolf
Adrienne C. Scheck
Gregory H. Turner
Qingwei Liu
David Frakes
Vikram Kodibagkar
Yang Kuang
Mark C. Preul
Eric J. Kostelich
spellingShingle Erica M. Rutter
Tracy L. Stepien
Barrett J. Anderies
Jonathan D. Plasencia
Eric C. Woolf
Adrienne C. Scheck
Gregory H. Turner
Qingwei Liu
David Frakes
Vikram Kodibagkar
Yang Kuang
Mark C. Preul
Eric J. Kostelich
Mathematical Analysis of Glioma Growth in a Murine Model
Scientific Reports
author_facet Erica M. Rutter
Tracy L. Stepien
Barrett J. Anderies
Jonathan D. Plasencia
Eric C. Woolf
Adrienne C. Scheck
Gregory H. Turner
Qingwei Liu
David Frakes
Vikram Kodibagkar
Yang Kuang
Mark C. Preul
Eric J. Kostelich
author_sort Erica M. Rutter
title Mathematical Analysis of Glioma Growth in a Murine Model
title_short Mathematical Analysis of Glioma Growth in a Murine Model
title_full Mathematical Analysis of Glioma Growth in a Murine Model
title_fullStr Mathematical Analysis of Glioma Growth in a Murine Model
title_full_unstemmed Mathematical Analysis of Glioma Growth in a Murine Model
title_sort mathematical analysis of glioma growth in a murine model
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Abstract Five immunocompetent C57BL/6-cBrd/cBrd/Cr (albino C57BL/6) mice were injected with GL261-luc2 cells, a cell line sharing characteristics of human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The mice were imaged using magnetic resonance (MR) at five separate time points to characterize growth and development of the tumor. After 25 days, the final tumor volumes of the mice varied from 12 mm3 to 62 mm3, even though mice were inoculated from the same tumor cell line under carefully controlled conditions. We generated hypotheses to explore large variances in final tumor size and tested them with our simple reaction-diffusion model in both a 3-dimensional (3D) finite difference method and a 2-dimensional (2D) level set method. The parameters obtained from a best-fit procedure, designed to yield simulated tumors as close as possible to the observed ones, vary by an order of magnitude between the three mice analyzed in detail. These differences may reflect morphological and biological variability in tumor growth, as well as errors in the mathematical model, perhaps from an oversimplification of the tumor dynamics or nonidentifiability of parameters. Our results generate parameters that match other experimental in vitro and in vivo measurements. Additionally, we calculate wave speed, which matches with other rat and human measurements.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02462-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ericamrutter mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
AT tracylstepien mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
AT barrettjanderies mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
AT jonathandplasencia mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
AT ericcwoolf mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
AT adriennecscheck mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
AT gregoryhturner mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
AT qingweiliu mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
AT davidfrakes mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
AT vikramkodibagkar mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
AT yangkuang mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
AT markcpreul mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
AT ericjkostelich mathematicalanalysisofgliomagrowthinamurinemodel
_version_ 1724394534299762688